• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十年冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗趋势:患者和病变特征、器械和技术的预后影响。

Ten-Year Trends in Coronary Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prognostic Effects of Patient and Lesion Characteristics, Devices, and Techniques.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Heart Vascular Stroke Institute Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Hospital Gwangju Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021632. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021632. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.021632
PMID:34514841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8649555/
Abstract

Background Despite advances in devices and techniques, coronary bifurcation lesion remains a challenging lesion subset in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluate 10-year trends in bifurcation PCI and their effects on patient outcomes. Methods and Results We analyzed 10-year trends in patient/lesion characteristics, devices, PCI strategy, stent optimization techniques, and clinical outcomes using data from 5498 patients who underwent bifurcation PCI from 2004 to 2015. Clinical outcomes 2 years after the index procedure were evaluated in terms of target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and a patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization). During the 10-year study period, patient and lesion complexity, such as multivessel disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and left main bifurcation, increased continuously (all <0.001). The risk of target vessel failure or patient-oriented composite outcome decreased continuously from 2004 to 2015 (target vessel failure: from 12.3% to 6.9%, log-rank <0.001; patient-oriented composite outcome: from 13.6% to 9.3%, log-rank <0.001). The use of a second-generation drug-eluting stent and decreased target vessel failure risk in true bifurcation lesions were the major contributors to improved patient prognosis (interaction values were <0.001 and 0.013, respectively). Conclusions During the past decade of bifurcation PCI, patient and lesion characteristics, devices, PCI techniques, and patient prognosis have all significantly changed. Despite increased patient and lesion complexity, clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI have improved, mainly because of better devices and more widespread adoption of procedural optimization techniques and appropriate treatment strategies. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01642992 and NCT03068494.

摘要

背景

尽管器械和技术取得了进步,但冠状动脉分叉病变仍然是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)领域极具挑战性的病变亚组。我们评估了 10 年来分叉 PCI 的趋势及其对患者结局的影响。

方法和结果

我们利用 2004 年至 2015 年期间接受分叉 PCI 的 5498 例患者的数据,分析了 10 年来患者/病变特征、器械、PCI 策略、支架优化技术和临床结局的趋势。在指数手术后 2 年评估了靶血管失败(包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)和患者导向复合结局(包括全因死亡、心肌梗死和任何血运重建)的临床结局。在 10 年的研究期间,患者和病变的复杂性(如多血管疾病、糖尿病、慢性肾脏病和左主干分叉)不断增加(均<0.001)。从 2004 年到 2015 年,靶血管失败或患者导向复合结局的风险不断降低(靶血管失败:从 12.3%降至 6.9%,对数秩检验<0.001;患者导向复合结局:从 13.6%降至 9.3%,对数秩检验<0.001)。第二代药物洗脱支架的应用和真性分叉病变中靶血管失败风险的降低是改善患者预后的主要原因(交互值分别为<0.001 和 0.013)。

结论

在过去 10 年的分叉 PCI 中,患者和病变特征、器械、PCI 技术和患者预后都发生了显著变化。尽管患者和病变的复杂性增加,但分叉 PCI 后的临床结局得到了改善,这主要是由于更好的器械和更广泛地采用了操作优化技术和适当的治疗策略。

注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01642992 和 NCT03068494。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/93769407b4ff/JAH3-10-e021632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/f5cf8e272ef0/JAH3-10-e021632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/380977107e30/JAH3-10-e021632-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/ff11404d41ec/JAH3-10-e021632-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/6e108350a678/JAH3-10-e021632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/f7c5acd84a66/JAH3-10-e021632-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/93769407b4ff/JAH3-10-e021632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/f5cf8e272ef0/JAH3-10-e021632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/380977107e30/JAH3-10-e021632-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/ff11404d41ec/JAH3-10-e021632-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/6e108350a678/JAH3-10-e021632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/f7c5acd84a66/JAH3-10-e021632-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ff/8649555/93769407b4ff/JAH3-10-e021632-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten-Year Trends in Coronary Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prognostic Effects of Patient and Lesion Characteristics, Devices, and Techniques.十年冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗趋势:患者和病变特征、器械和技术的预后影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021632. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021632. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
Prognostic Effects of Treatment Strategies for Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent.当前代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干与非左主干分叉病变的治疗策略的预后影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008543. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008543. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Major Predictors of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions With 2-Stent Strategy: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉分叉病变双支架策略的长期临床结局的主要预测因素:韩国分叉队列的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 26;9(18):1879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
4
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent.经桡动脉入路与经股动脉入路在第二代药物洗脱支架分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Mar 18;39(10):e111. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e111.
5
Differential Long-Term Effects of First- and Second-Generation DES in Patients With Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing PCI.第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的分叉病变患者的长期差异影响。
JACC Asia. 2021 Jun 15;1(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
7
Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Distal Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的左主干远端患者的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007007.
8
Differential Prognostic Effect Between First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.冠状动脉分叉病变中第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架的预后差异:韩国分叉队列的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1318-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.014.
9
First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial.第一代与第二代药物洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:LEADERS全人群随机试验的5年随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):E248-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26344. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Determines Outcome After 2- But Not 1-Stent Strategy in Left Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中 2 支架策略而非 1 支架策略后双联抗血小板治疗时间决定结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2453-2463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Clinical Features and Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Bifurcation Stenting Using the Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Technique - 1-year Follow-up.采用双吻裤裙式和裤裙式技术行分叉支架置入术治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床特征及预后的性别差异——1年随访
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 May 7;21:361-370. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S513926. eCollection 2025.
2
Three-Year Outcomes After Bifurcation Stenting With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents: Final Results From the RESOLUTE ONYX Postapproval Study.佐他莫司洗脱支架分叉病变支架置入术后三年结果:RESOLUTE ONYX批准后研究的最终结果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Aug 5;2(6Part A):101116. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101116. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs.韩国和日本冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗基本概念的差异。来自韩国和日本分叉俱乐部专家问卷调查的启示。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jan;37(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00742-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial.多中心、随机对照研究:复杂冠状动脉分叉病变患者中双支架技术与临时支架置入技术的比较——DEFINITION II试验
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2523-2536. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after kissing balloon inflation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with provisional stenting technique. Results from the real-world multicenter registry.采用临时支架置入技术治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者球囊扩张术后的长期临床结局。真实世界多中心注册研究结果。
Indian Heart J. 2023 Sep-Oct;75(5):313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Bifurcation strategies using second-generation drug-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in diabetic patients.使用第二代药物洗脱支架的分叉策略对糖尿病患者临床结局的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 21;9:1018802. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1018802. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon combined with cutting balloon for side branch of true coronary bifurcation lesions: Study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.药物涂层球囊联合切割球囊治疗真性冠状动脉分叉病变分支的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1035728. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035728. eCollection 2022.
Optimal Stenting Technique for Complex Coronary Lesions: Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Pre-Dilation, Stent Sizing, and Post-Dilation.
复杂冠状动脉病变的最佳支架置入技术:冠状动脉内影像学指导的预扩张、支架大小选择和后扩张。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1403-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Asia Pacific consensus document on coronary bifurcation interventions.亚太共识文件关于冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Oct 9;16(9):e706-e714. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00977.
5
Prognostic Effects of Treatment Strategies for Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent.当前代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干与非左主干分叉病变的治疗策略的预后影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008543. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008543. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
6
Trends in Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in the United States, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年美国冠状动脉血运重建患者特征和结局的变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1921326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21326.
7
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗阻塞性分叉病变:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的第 14 份共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2019 May 20;15(1):90-98. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00144.
10
The Proximal Optimization Technique Improves Clinical Outcomes When Treated without Kissing Ballooning in Patients with a Bifurcation Lesion.在分叉病变患者中,近端优化技术在不使用亲吻球囊扩张的情况下进行治疗时可改善临床结局。
Korean Circ J. 2019 Jun;49(6):485-494. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0352. Epub 2019 Feb 22.