Shelter Outreach Consultation Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Aug;24(8):739-744. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211043820. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
The aim of this study was to determine whether there was an increase in cat relinquishment for destructive scratching behavior, a change in overall feline surrender intake and euthanasia, or a change in average length of stay in a British Columbia shelter system after provincial legislation banning elective onychectomy.
Records of cats admitted to the British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in the 36 months prior to (1 May 2015-30 April 2018, n = 41,157) and after (1 May 2018-30 April 2021, n = 33,430) the provincial ban on elective onychectomy were reviewed. Total intake numbers, euthanasia and length of stay were descriptively compared between periods. Proportions of cats and kittens surrendered for destructive scratching, as well as the proportion of cats and kittens surrendered with an owner request for euthanasia, were compared using two-sample -tests of proportions.
Destructive behavior was found to be an uncommon reason for surrender (0.18% of surrendered cats) during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of cats surrendered for destructive scratching behavior ( = -1.89, >0.05) after the provincial ban on elective onychectomy. On the contrary, the proportion of owner-requested euthanasias decreased after the ban ( = 3.90, <0.001). The total number of cats surrendered, the shelter live release rate and average length of stay all remained stable or improved following the ban, though causation could not be determined.
The findings in this study suggest that legislation banning elective onychectomy does not increase the risk of feline shelter relinquishment - for destructive behavior or overall - and is unlikely to have a significant effect on shelter euthanasia or length of stay.
本研究旨在确定在不列颠哥伦比亚省立法禁止选择性去爪术后,是否有更多的猫因破坏性抓挠行为而被遗弃,整体猫的收容数量和安乐死数量是否有变化,或者不列颠哥伦比亚省动物保护协会收容系统中的猫的平均停留时间是否有变化。
回顾了在省禁止选择性去爪术之前(2015 年 5 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日,n=41157)和之后(2018 年 5 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 30 日,n=33430)的 36 个月内进入不列颠哥伦比亚省动物保护协会的猫的记录。在两个时间段之间,对总收容数量、安乐死数量和停留时间进行了描述性比较。使用两样本比例检验比较了因破坏性抓挠而被收容的猫和小猫的比例,以及因主人要求安乐死而被收容的猫和小猫的比例。
在研究期间,破坏性行为被发现是一个不太常见的收容原因(0.18%的被收容猫)。在省禁止选择性去爪术后,因破坏性抓挠行为而被收容的猫的数量没有统计学上的显著差异( =−1.89,>0.05)。相反,在禁令之后,主人要求安乐死的比例下降( =3.90,<0.001)。在禁令之后,被收容的猫的总数、收容所的释放率和平均停留时间都保持稳定或有所改善,尽管不能确定因果关系。
本研究的结果表明,禁止选择性去爪术的立法不会增加猫被收容所遗弃的风险--无论是因为破坏性行为还是整体原因,并且不太可能对收容所安乐死或停留时间产生重大影响。