Bianco Giuseppe
Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
Hist Psychol. 2022 May;25(2):170-189. doi: 10.1037/hop0000156. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
The present article assesses the hidden importance of Georges Politzer's (1903-1942) work in the development of French philosophy and psychology. After sketching his biography and isolating the most important concepts developed in his book (1928), this article proceeds by dividing his reception into four distinct moments, the features of which derive from the interconnected mutations of the scientific field in its relation with the transformation of the political field. In the first moment, the publication of the , Politzer's most important work, played an essential role in introducing psychoanalysis into philosophy, psychology, and psychiatry, and in sketching the path of a possible encounter between psychoanalysis and Marxism. In the second moment, during the 1940s and the 1950s, following Politzer's Marxist auto-critique, French communists widely rejected psychoanalysis as a dangerous ideology. In the third moment, during the 1960s in a context marked by structuralism, both the psychoanalysts and the Marxists addressed to Politzer's humanism a new, theoretical, critique. Finally, at the end of the 1960s and even more after May 1968, Politzer's works were republished and reevaluated, and new transformations taking place in the intellectual and political field during the 1970s contributed to a better understanding of Politzer's essential role in French philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
本文评估了乔治·波利策(1903 - 1942)的著作在法国哲学与心理学发展过程中被忽视的重要性。在简述他的生平并梳理其1928年出版的著作中所提出的最重要概念之后,本文将对他的接受情况分为四个不同阶段进行阐述,这些阶段的特点源于科学领域与政治领域相互关联的变化。在第一个阶段,波利策最重要的著作《心理学基础批判》的出版,在将精神分析引入哲学、心理学和精神病学,并勾勒精神分析与马克思主义可能的交汇路径方面发挥了重要作用。在第二个阶段,20世纪40年代和50年代,在波利策进行马克思主义自我批判之后,法国共产党广泛地将精神分析视为一种危险的意识形态而加以摒弃。在第三个阶段,20世纪60年代,在结构主义盛行的背景下,精神分析学家和马克思主义者都对波利策的人道主义提出了新的理论批判。最后,在20世纪60年代末,尤其是在1968年五月风暴之后,波利策的著作被重新出版和重新评估,20世纪70年代在知识和政治领域发生的新变化有助于人们更好地理解波利策在法国哲学、心理学和精神分析领域的重要作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)