• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素治疗重症哮喘的成本-效用分析。

Cost-utility of azithromycin in patients with severe asthma.

机构信息

Research group in Pharmacology and Toxicology" INFARTO". Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Concejo de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2022 Oct;59(10):2008-2015. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1980586. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2021.1980586
PMID:34516322
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important proportion of asthma patients remain uncontrolled despite the use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. Some add-on therapies, like azithromycin, have been recommended for this subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of azithromycin as an add-on therapy to ICS + LABA for patients with severe asthma.

METHODS

A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with severe asthma in Colombia. The total costs and QALYS of two interventions, including standard therapy (ICS + LABA), and add-on therapy with azithromycin, were calculated over a lifetime horizon. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $19,000.

RESULTS

The model suggests a potential gain of 0.037 QALYs per patient per year on azithromycin, with a difference of US $718 in favor of azithromycin, showing dominance with respect to SOC. A position of dominance negates the need to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In the deterministic sensitivity analyses, our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters.

CONCLUSION

Add-on therapy with azithromycin was found to be cost-effective when added to usual care in patients who remain uncontrolled despite treatment with medium or high-dose ICS/LABA.

摘要

背景

尽管使用吸入皮质类固醇和长效β激动剂,仍有相当一部分哮喘患者未能得到控制。对于这一小部分患者,一些附加治疗方法,如阿奇霉素,已被推荐使用。本研究旨在评估阿奇霉素作为中高剂量吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂联合治疗方案的附加疗法,对于严重哮喘患者的成本效益。

方法

为了评估阿奇霉素作为中高剂量吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂联合治疗方案的附加疗法,对于严重哮喘患者的成本效益,我们建立了一个概率性 Markov 模型来估计哥伦比亚严重哮喘患者的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。计算了两种干预措施(标准治疗[ICS/LABA]和阿奇霉素附加治疗)的总成本和 QALYs,包括终生。进行了多次敏感性分析。以支付意愿值 19,000 美元为标准,评估成本效益。

结果

该模型表明,在阿奇霉素治疗组中,每位患者每年潜在增加 0.037 个 QALYs,而阿奇霉素治疗组比 SOC 组每年多花费 718 美元,表现出相对于 SOC 的优势。优势地位排除了计算增量成本效益比的需要。在确定性敏感性分析中,我们的基本案例结果在所有假设和参数的变化下都是稳健的。

结论

在中高剂量 ICS/LABA 治疗后仍未得到控制的患者中,附加阿奇霉素治疗被发现是具有成本效益的。

相似文献

1
Cost-utility of azithromycin in patients with severe asthma.阿奇霉素治疗重症哮喘的成本-效用分析。
J Asthma. 2022 Oct;59(10):2008-2015. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1980586. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Cost-utility of as-needed ICS-formoterol versus to maintenance ICS in mild to moderate persistent asthma.按需使用 ICS-福莫特罗与维持治疗 ICS 对轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成本-效用分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01775-1.
3
Tiotropium for children and adolescents with severe asthma.噻托溴铵用于患有重度哮喘的儿童和青少年。
J Asthma. 2023 May;60(5):1009-1015. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2120403. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Cost-utility of triple versus dual inhaler therapy in moderate to severe asthma.中重度哮喘中三联吸入器与双联吸入器治疗的成本-效用比较。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01777-z.
5
Cost-utility of tiotropium in patients with severe asthma.噻托溴铵在重度哮喘患者中的成本效用分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00508-x.
6
Cost-utility analysis of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists in South Korea.韩国重度嗜酸粒细胞性哮喘患者在高剂量吸入皮质类固醇和长效β-激动剂治疗控制不佳的情况下,使用瑞利珠单抗的成本效用分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1605159. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Cost‑effectiveness of tiotropium versus omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma.噻托溴铵与奥马珠单抗治疗未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本-效果分析。
J Asthma. 2022 Oct;59(10):2016-2023. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1984527. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in US.噻托溴铵与奥马珠单抗治疗美国未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 30;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0089-8. eCollection 2018.
9
SMART therapy in adolescent and adults patients with moderate persistent asthma: a cost-utility analysis.SMART 疗法在中重度持续性青少年和成人哮喘患者中的成本效用分析。
J Asthma. 2022 Dec;59(12):2367-2374. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.2019266. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Long-Acting Beta Agonists versus Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists in Older Adults with Persistent Asthma Receiving Concomitant Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy.长效β受体激动剂与白三烯受体拮抗剂用于接受吸入性糖皮质激素联合治疗的老年持续性哮喘患者的成本-效用分析
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility of as-needed ICS-formoterol versus to maintenance ICS in mild to moderate persistent asthma.按需使用 ICS-福莫特罗与维持治疗 ICS 对轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成本-效用分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01775-1.