Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2022 Jan;79(1):127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
The optimal right ventricular (RV) pacing site during pacemaker implantation is still unclear due to left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony by traditional RV pacing. His-bundle (HIS) pacing has achieved narrow QRS and maintained LV synchrony but high failure rate. RV septal pacing occasionally has QRS waveform with wide and narrow component in the early and late phase, respectively, and maintains LV synchrony, reflecting the normal conduction system. We aimed to define this QRS waveform as retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system (RPP-CS) and compared its effect on LV synchrony as an alternative approach of HIS pacing.
We enrolled 42 patients with atrio ventricular block (AVB) or bradycardia atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring pacemaker implantation (RPP-CS, n = 27; no RPP-CS, n = 15). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. RPP-CS was observed in 96% and 26% of the RV septum and apex area, respectively. RPP-CS had a significantly shorter QRS width (p < 0.001). The frequency of maintaining LV synchrony was significantly higher in RPP-CS (67% vs. 20%, p = 0.003). The QRS interval's optimal cut-off value during RPP-CS was 132 ms for prediction of LV synchrony (sensitivity 83%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, and negative predictive value 73%). During RPP-CS, shorter QRS intervals (QRS ≤ 132 ms) had better postoperative LV ejection fraction than longer intervals (p < 0.001).
RPP-CS, especially with short QRS intervals (≤132 ms), had a high frequency of LV synchrony, maintained postoperative cardiac function, and may be an adequate first-line RV pacing site strategy for AVB or bradycardia AF as an alternative approach of HIS pacing.
由于传统右心室(RV)起搏导致左心室(LV)不同步,在起搏器植入过程中,最佳的 RV 起搏部位仍不清楚。希氏束(HIS)起搏可实现窄 QRS 并保持 LV 同步,但失败率较高。RV 间隔起搏偶尔会出现早期和晚期分别具有宽和窄成分的 QRS 波形态,并保持 LV 同步,反映正常的传导系统。我们旨在将这种 QRS 波形态定义为逆行穿透起搏进入传导系统(RPP-CS),并将其作为 HIS 起搏替代方法对 LV 同步的影响进行比较。
我们纳入了 42 例需要起搏器植入的房室传导阻滞(AVB)或心动过缓性心房颤动(AF)患者(RPP-CS 组,n=27;无 RPP-CS 组,n=15)。两组的基线特征相似。RPP-CS 在 RV 间隔和心尖区的发生率分别为 96%和 26%。RPP-CS 的 QRS 波宽度明显更窄(p<0.001)。RPP-CS 保持 LV 同步的频率明显更高(67%比 20%,p=0.003)。RPP-CS 时 QRS 波的最佳截断值为 132 ms 预测 LV 同步(灵敏度 83%,特异性 89%,阳性预测值 94%,阴性预测值 73%)。在 RPP-CS 期间,较短的 QRS 间隔(QRS≤132 ms)术后 LV 射血分数优于较长的间隔(p<0.001)。
RPP-CS,尤其是 QRS 间隔较短(≤132 ms)的患者,LV 同步的频率较高,保持术后心功能,可能是 AVB 或心动过缓性 AF 的一种充分的 RV 起搏首选部位策略,可作为 HIS 起搏的替代方法。