Suppr超能文献

不同部位临时右心室起搏对心功能超声心动图指标的影响。

Impact of temporary right ventricular pacing from different sites on echocardiographic indices of cardiac function.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary/University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1738-46. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur207. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the impact of pacing from different right ventricular (RV) pacing sites on left ventricular (LV) function. Chronic apical RV pacing may induce heart failure. To reduce this RV, mid-septum and outflow tract are suggested as alternative pacing sites. We therefore assessed cardiac performance during temporary RV pacing from apical vs. mid-septum or outflow tract sites, using echocardiography and electrocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients scheduled for a permanent pacemaker underwent temporary pacing in dual-chamber mode (DDD) and with atrio-ventricular delay optimized. The ventricular lead was moved to either the RV apex, mid-septum or outflow tract. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed in each position. Twenty-two patients completed the study. The baseline data was collected at atrial pacing mode (AAI). QRS duration lengthened with RV apical pacing (97 ± 22 ms AAI vs. 154 ± 18 ms RV apical, P < 0.001) and shortened with mid-septum or outflow tract pacing (147 ± 14 ms RV mid-septum and 136 ± 16 ms RV outflow tract, P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively, vs. RV apical). Right ventricular apical pacing was associated with reductions in stroke volume and LV ejection fraction (54 ± 6% AAI vs. 48 ± 5% RV apical, P = 0.001). Right ventricular mid-septum (52 ± 5%) and outflow tract (54 ± 6%) pacing improved LV ejection fraction in comparison with apical pacing (P < 0.01 for both). Pacing at all sites induced dyssynchrony. In comparison with RV apical pacing dyssynchrony was reduced by mid-septum or outflow tract pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricular pacing at the mid-septum or outflow tract results in narrower QRS complexes, less dyssynchrony, and better LV systolic function than RV apical pacing.

摘要

目的

评估不同右心室(RV)起搏部位对左心室(LV)功能的影响。慢性心尖部 RV 起搏可能导致心力衰竭。为了减少 RV 的这种影响,建议将中隔和流出道作为替代起搏部位。因此,我们使用超声心动图和心电图评估了从心尖部与中隔部或流出道起搏时的心脏性能。

方法和结果

计划植入永久性起搏器的患者接受了双腔模式(DDD)的临时起搏,并优化了房室延迟。心室导联被移动到 RV 心尖部、中隔部或流出道。在每个位置都进行了全面的超声心动图检查。22 例患者完成了研究。基础数据是在心房起搏模式(AAI)下采集的。与 RV 心尖部起搏时(97 ± 22 ms AAI 与 154 ± 18 ms RV 心尖部,P < 0.001)相比,RV 心尖部起搏时 QRS 时限延长(97 ± 22 ms AAI 与 154 ± 18 ms RV 心尖部,P < 0.001),而在中隔部或流出道起搏时缩短(147 ± 14 ms RV 中隔部和 136 ± 16 ms RV 流出道,P = 0.001 和 P < 0.001,分别与 RV 心尖部相比)。右心室心尖部起搏与每搏量和左心室射血分数降低相关(54 ± 6% AAI 与 48 ± 5% RV 心尖部,P = 0.001)。与心尖部起搏相比,RV 中隔部(52 ± 5%)和流出道(54 ± 6%)起搏均改善了左心室射血分数(两者均 P < 0.01)。所有部位起搏均引起不同步。与 RV 心尖部起搏相比,中隔部或流出道起搏可减少不同步。

结论

与 RV 心尖部起搏相比,RV 中隔部或流出道起搏导致 QRS 复合体更窄、不同步更少、左心室收缩功能更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验