• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CauchyCP:基于 Cauchy 组合变点 Cox 回归的非比例风险下的强大检验。

CauchyCP: A powerful test under non-proportional hazards using Cauchy combination of change-point Cox regressions.

机构信息

Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):2447-2458. doi: 10.1177/09622802211037076. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/09622802211037076
PMID:34520293
Abstract

Non-proportional hazards data are routinely encountered in randomized clinical trials. In such cases, classic Cox proportional hazards model can suffer from severe power loss, with difficulty in interpretation of the estimated hazard ratio since the treatment effect varies over time. We propose CauchyCP, an omnibus test of change-point Cox regression models, to overcome both challenges while detecting signals of non-proportional hazards patterns. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that, compared to existing treatment comparison tests under non-proportional hazards, the proposed CauchyCP test (a) controls the type I error better at small levels (); (b) increases the power of detecting time-varying effects; and (c) is more computationally efficient than popular methods like MaxCombo for large-scale data analysis. The superior performance of CauchyCP is further illustrated using retrospective analyses of two randomized clinical trial datasets and a pharmacogenetic biomarker study dataset. The R package is publicly available on CRAN.

摘要

在随机临床试验中,经常会遇到非比例风险数据。在这种情况下,经典的 Cox 比例风险模型可能会严重丧失效力,并且由于治疗效果随时间变化,估计的风险比也难以解释。我们提出了 CauchyCP,这是一种用于检测非比例风险模式信号的全面变化点 Cox 回归模型检验方法,可以克服这两个挑战。广泛的模拟研究表明,与非比例风险下现有的治疗比较检验相比,所提出的 CauchyCP 检验 (a) 在小水平 () 下更好地控制了Ⅰ类错误;(b) 提高了检测时变效应的功效;(c) 在大规模数据分析方面比 MaxCombo 等流行方法更具计算效率。通过对两个随机临床试验数据集和一个药物基因组学生物标志物研究数据集的回顾性分析,进一步说明了 CauchyCP 的优越性能。该 R 包可在 CRAN 上公开获取。

相似文献

1
CauchyCP: A powerful test under non-proportional hazards using Cauchy combination of change-point Cox regressions.CauchyCP:基于 Cauchy 组合变点 Cox 回归的非比例风险下的强大检验。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):2447-2458. doi: 10.1177/09622802211037076. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
Comparison between asymptotic and re-randomisation tests under non-proportional hazards in a randomised controlled trial using the minimisation method.最小化法在非比例风险随机对照试验中渐近检验和再随机检验的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02295-2.
3
A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome.一项模拟研究比较了九种用于评估时间事件结局的随机对照试验中处理效应的检验效能。
Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4153-2.
4
Log-Rank Test vs MaxCombo and Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time Tests for Comparing Survival Under Nonproportional Hazards in Immuno-oncology Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对数秩检验与最大连续检验和受限平均生存时间检验在免疫肿瘤学试验中非比例风险下生存比较的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;8(9):1294-1300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2666.
5
-sample omnibus non-proportional hazards tests based on right-censored data.基于右删失数据的样本综合非比例风险测试
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Oct;29(10):2830-2850. doi: 10.1177/0962280220907355. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
7
An approach to trial design and analysis in the era of non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect.治疗效果非比例风险时代的试验设计与分析方法。
Trials. 2014 Aug 7;15:314. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-314.
8
The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?平均风险比——当比例风险假设不成立时,用于事件发生时间终点的良好效应量度?
Methods Inf Med. 2018 May;57(3):89-100. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0058. Epub 2018 May 2.
9
A comparison of different population-level summary measures for randomised trials with time-to-event outcomes, with a focus on non-inferiority trials.不同人群水平汇总指标在时间事件结局随机试验中的比较,重点关注非劣效性试验。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):594-602. doi: 10.1177/17407745231181907. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
10
Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.在横断面基因关联研究中,Cox比例风险模型比逻辑回归模型具有更强的统计效能。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 Sep;16(9):1111-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.59. Epub 2008 Apr 2.