• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emotional reactions of trained overdose responders who use opioids following intervention in an overdose event.在干预过量用药事件后使用阿片类药物的训练有素的过量用药反应者的情绪反应。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):581-591. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1975870. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
"They're not doing enough.": women's experiences with opioids and naloxone in Toronto.“他们做得还不够。”:多伦多女性对阿片类药物和纳洛酮的体验。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Mar 20;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00360-3.
3
A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City.纽约市使用阿片类药物者在阿片类药物过量干预期间重复使用纳洛酮的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102968. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102968. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
If we build it, will they come? Perspectives on pharmacy-based naloxone among family and friends of people who use opioids: a mixed methods study.如果我们提供,他们会来吗?对使用阿片类药物者的家人和朋友中基于药店的纳洛酮的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13078-z.
5
First Responders' Views of Naloxone: Does Stigma Matter?急救人员对纳洛酮的看法:污名化重要吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(10):1534-1544. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2092150. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
Decision-making by laypersons equipped with an emergency response smartphone app for opioid overdose.非专业人士使用配备有急救响应智能手机应用程序处理阿片类药物过量的决策。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Sep;95:103250. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103250. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Naloxone protection, social support, network characteristics, and overdose experiences among a cohort of people who use illicit opioids in New York City.纽约市滥用非法阿片类药物人群队列中纳洛酮保护、社会支持、网络特征和过量用药经历。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 4;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00604-w.
8
How competent are people who use opioids at responding to overdoses? Qualitative analyses of actions and decisions taken during overdose emergencies.使用阿片类药物的人应对过量的能力如何?对过量紧急情况下采取的行动和决策的定性分析。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):708-718. doi: 10.1111/add.14510. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Patient, family members and community pharmacists' views of a proposed overdose prevention intervention delivered in community pharmacies for patients prescribed high-strength opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: An explorative intervention development study.患者、家庭成员及社区药剂师对一项拟在社区药房为开具高强度阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛的患者实施的过量用药预防干预措施的看法:一项探索性干预措施开发研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Mar;42(3):517-526. doi: 10.1111/dar.13554. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
10
Harm Reduction in the Field: First Responders' Perceptions of Opioid Overdose Interventions.现场减少伤害:急救人员对阿片类药物过量干预的看法。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):490-499. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18033.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring trauma and wellbeing of people who use drugs after witnessing overdose: A qualitative study.目睹药物过量后吸毒者的创伤与幸福感探索:一项定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Dec;122:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104239. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Drug use behaviors, trauma, and emotional affect following the overdose of a social network member: A qualitative investigation.社交网络成员药物过量后的用药行为、创伤和情绪影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Sep;107:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103792. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
"It's an emotional roller coaster… But sometimes it's fucking awesome": Meaning and motivation of work for peers in overdose response environments in British Columbia.“这是一场情感过山车……但有时也非常棒”:不列颠哥伦比亚省过量反应环境中同行工作的意义和动机。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:103015. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103015. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City.纽约市使用阿片类药物者在阿片类药物过量干预期间重复使用纳洛酮的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102968. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102968. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Iterative categorisation (IC) (part 2): interpreting qualitative data.迭代分类法(IC)(第二部分):解释定性数据。
Addiction. 2021 Mar;116(3):668-676. doi: 10.1111/add.15259. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Intervention in an opioid overdose event increases interest in treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder.干预阿片类药物过量事件会增加患有阿片类药物使用障碍的个体对治疗的兴趣。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):407-411. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1809607. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Factors associated with withdrawal symptoms and anger among people resuscitated from an opioid overdose by take-home naloxone: Exploratory mixed methods analysis.通过带回家的纳洛酮从阿片类药物过量中复苏的人群中与戒断症状和愤怒相关的因素:探索性混合方法分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Oct;117:108099. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108099. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
The Bell Tolls for Thee & Thine: Compassion Fatigue & the Overdose Epidemic.钟声为你敲响:职业耗竭与阿片类药物滥用危机。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Nov;85:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102796. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2018.美国 1999-2018 年药物过量死亡人数。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Jan(356):1-8.
8
Opioid overdose reversals using naloxone in New York City by people who use opioids: Implications for public health and overdose harm reduction approaches from a qualitative study.纽约市使用阿片类药物的人群使用纳洛酮逆转阿片类药物过量:一项定性研究对公共卫生和过量用药危害减少方法的启示
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr 15;79:102751. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102751.
9
"Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems": Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research.“一切完美,我们没有问题”:在定性研究中发现和限制社会期望偏差。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):783-792. doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
'It's too much, I'm getting really tired of it': Overdose response and structural vulnerabilities among harm reduction workers in community settings.“太多了,我真的受够了”:在社区环境中,减少伤害工作者的过量反应和结构脆弱性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

在干预过量用药事件后使用阿片类药物的训练有素的过量用药反应者的情绪反应。

Emotional reactions of trained overdose responders who use opioids following intervention in an overdose event.

机构信息

Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):581-591. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1975870. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1080/08897077.2021.1975870
PMID:34520679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8810579/
Abstract

Our aim was to explore emotional reactions to intervening in an overdose event from the perspective of individuals who use opioids (peer responders). In addition, we were interested in the impact this experience may have on peer responders' feelings about helping in an overdose situation in the future. For this qualitative sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), data from 61 interviews were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Peer responders had diverse emotional reactions to the overdose event. These ranged from a sense of pride and other positive feelings associated with their ability to help to ambivalence about being involved in situations perceived as challenging and burdensome. There were few reports of the overdose event as an exclusively negative experience. Many peer responders perceived it as their duty to use naloxone again if required. However, some had ambivalent feelings toward this responsibility, which may be related to negative experiences with previous intervention efforts. The capacity of people who use opioids to help reduce the harms associated with opioid overdose is experienced as empowering by some. Nonetheless, engaging peer responders in strategies to reduce opioid-related mortality should be coupled with appropriate resources to process their experiences and emotional responses.

摘要

我们的目的是从使用阿片类药物的个体(同伴反应者)的角度探讨干预过量事件的情绪反应。此外,我们还关注这种体验对同伴反应者未来在过量情况下提供帮助的感受可能产生的影响。 作为一项随机对照试验(RCT)的定性子研究,采用归纳法对 61 次访谈的资料进行了主题分析。 同伴反应者对过量事件有不同的情绪反应。这些反应范围从对自己帮助能力的自豪感和其他积极感觉,到对被认为具有挑战性和负担的情况的参与的矛盾心理。很少有人报告说过量事件是一种纯粹的负面体验。许多同伴反应者认为,如果需要,他们有义务再次使用纳洛酮。然而,一些人对这种责任感到矛盾,这可能与以前干预努力的负面经历有关。 一些人认为,使用阿片类药物的人有能力帮助减轻与阿片类药物过量相关的伤害,这是一种赋权的体验。尽管如此,让同伴反应者参与减少阿片类相关死亡率的策略应该同时配备适当的资源,以处理他们的经历和情绪反应。