• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫持续状态的管理和死亡风险因素:一项回顾性研究。

Status epilepticus management and mortality risk factors: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Servicio de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Servicio de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2022 Sep;37(7):532-542. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.06.009. Epub 2021 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.06.009
PMID:34521607
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency with relatively high mortality rates. In this study, we analysed the management of SE and identified mortality risk factors that may be addressed with educational interventions or modifications to hospital protocols.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analysed demographic, treatment, and outcome data from 65 patients (mean age, 59 years [range, 44.5-77]; 53.8% women) who were admitted to our tertiary hospital during an 18-month period and met the 2015 International League Against Epilepsy criteria for SE.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (46.2%) had history of epilepsy. The most frequent causes of SE were cerebrovascular disease (27.7%) and systemic infection (16.9%). The following deviations were observed in the administration of the antiepileptic drugs: benzodiazepines were used as first option in only 33 (50.8%) patients; the combination of 2 benzodiazepines was recorded in 7 cases (10.8%); and lacosamide was used as an off-label drug in 5 patients (7.7%). Electroencephalography studies were performed in only 26 patients (40%); and only 5 studies (7.7% of patients) were performed within 12 hours of seizure onset. The mortality rate was 21.5%. Acute stroke and cerebrovascular complications were associated with higher mortality rates, while previous history of epilepsy and admission to intensive care were related to better prognosis (P <  .05).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve SE management and reduce mortality rates, training activities targeting emergency department physicians should be implemented, together with elective intensive care admission for patients with multiple mortality risk factors (eg, absence of history of epilepsy, acute stroke, or cardiovascular complications).

摘要

介绍

癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种具有相对较高死亡率的神经急症。在本研究中,我们分析了 SE 的治疗方法,并确定了可能通过教育干预或修改医院方案来解决的死亡风险因素。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了在 18 个月期间入住我们的三级医院的 65 名患者(平均年龄 59 岁[范围,44.5-77];53.8%为女性)的人口统计学、治疗和结局数据,这些患者符合 2015 年国际抗癫痫联盟 SE 标准。

结果

30 名患者(46.2%)有癫痫病史。SE 的最常见病因是脑血管病(27.7%)和全身感染(16.9%)。在抗癫痫药物的管理中观察到以下偏差:只有 33 名患者(50.8%)首选苯二氮䓬类药物;7 例(10.8%)记录了 2 种苯二氮䓬类药物的联合使用;5 名患者(7.7%)使用拉考酰胺作为超说明书药物。仅对 26 名患者(40%)进行了脑电图研究;只有 5 项研究(7.7%的患者)在发作后 12 小时内进行。死亡率为 21.5%。急性中风和脑血管并发症与更高的死亡率相关,而既往癫痫病史和入住重症监护病房与更好的预后相关(P<0.05)。

结论

为了改善 SE 的管理并降低死亡率,应针对急诊科医生开展培训活动,并对具有多种死亡风险因素的患者(例如无癫痫病史、急性中风或心血管并发症)进行选择性重症监护入院。

相似文献

1
Status epilepticus management and mortality risk factors: a retrospective study.癫痫持续状态的管理和死亡风险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2022 Sep;37(7):532-542. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.06.009. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
2
Status epilepticus management and mortality risk factors: A retrospective study.癫痫持续状态的管理和死亡风险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2022 Sep;37(7):532-542. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
3
Status epilepticus-Therapeutic management at the pediatric emergency department.癫痫持续状态-儿科急诊的治疗管理。
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2024 Jun;39(5):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.09.014.
4
Seizures in the Emergency Department: clinical and diagnostic data from a series of 153 patients.急诊科的癫痫发作:153例患者的临床及诊断数据
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2023 Jan-Feb;38(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.02.011. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Status epilepticus: why, what, and how.癫痫持续状态:为何、是什么以及如何(发生)。
J Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;57(3):242-52. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.81807.
6
Status epilepticus mimicking stroke recurrence.癫痫持续状态酷似脑卒中复发。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Mar;104(Pt B):106509. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106509. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Status Epilepticus in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Morocco: A Retrospective Analysis.摩洛哥一家三级医疗医院的癫痫持续状态:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):e50591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50591. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Safety and efficacy of intravenous lacosamide for adjunctive treatment of refractory status epilepticus: a comparative cohort study.静脉注射拉考酰胺辅助治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的安全性和有效性:一项对照队列研究。
CNS Drugs. 2013 Apr;27(4):321-9. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0049-y.
9
Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit.在神经重症监护病房中,吡仑帕奈用于治疗难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 9.
10
Retrospective multicentre observational study on clinical management and treatment of different types of status epilepticus in clinical practice.回顾性多中心观察性研究,针对临床实践中不同类型癫痫持续状态的临床管理和治疗。
Neurologia. 2017 Jun;32(5):284-289. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2015.11.018. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Early rehabilitation and improved outcomes in patients with status epilepticus: Evidence from cases presenting to the emergency department.癫痫持续状态患者的早期康复与改善预后:来自急诊科病例的证据
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Apr;10(2):549-556. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70017. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Status Epilepticus in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Morocco: A Retrospective Analysis.摩洛哥一家三级医疗医院的癫痫持续状态:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):e50591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50591. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Epidemiology, real-world treatment and mortality of patients with status epilepticus in Germany: insights from a large healthcare database.
德国癫痫持续状态患者的流行病学、实际治疗情况及死亡率:来自大型医疗数据库的见解
Brain Commun. 2023 Apr 30;5(3):fcad145. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad145. eCollection 2023.