Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 34 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.
Artificial Intelligence and Big-Data Convergence Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 38-13 Dokjeom, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97675-9.
A recent meta-analysis addressed increased risk of death following revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in femopopliteal artery. We evaluated differences in all-cause mortality and amputation free survival between peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients who were treated with paclitaxel-coated devices and non-paclitaxel-coated devices. This was retrospective population-based cohort study from the National Health Insurance Service claims in South Korea from 2015 to 2019. Multivariate Cox regression analyses after propensity score matching were applied to identify all-cause mortality and amputation-free survival. After propensity score matching, there were 6090 patients per group. The median follow-up days was 580 days (interquartile range [IQR] 240-991 days) and 433 days (IQR 175-757 days) for the non-paclitaxel-coated device group and paclitaxel-coated device group, respectively. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, warfarin, and new oral anticoagulants showed that the mortality rate associated with paclitaxel-coated devices was not significantly higher than non-paclitaxel-coated devices (hazard ratio [HR] 0.992; 95% CI 0.91-1.08). The rate of amputation events was higher in patients with paclitaxel-coated devices than those with non-paclitaxel-coated devices (HR 1.614; 95% CI 1.46-1.78). In this analysis, the mortality rate in patients with PAD was not associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated devices, despite a higher amputation rate.
一项最近的荟萃分析探讨了在股腘动脉中使用紫杉醇涂层器械再血管化后死亡风险增加的问题。我们评估了接受紫杉醇涂层器械和非紫杉醇涂层器械治疗的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者之间全因死亡率和免于截肢的生存率的差异。这是一项来自韩国国家健康保险服务索赔的回顾性基于人群的队列研究,时间范围为 2015 年至 2019 年。应用倾向评分匹配后的多变量 Cox 回归分析来确定全因死亡率和免于截肢的生存率。在倾向评分匹配后,每组各有 6090 例患者。非紫杉醇涂层器械组和紫杉醇涂层器械组的中位随访天数分别为 580 天(四分位距 [IQR] 240-991 天)和 433 天(IQR 175-757 天)。多变量分析调整了年龄、性别、糖尿病、高血压、华法林和新型口服抗凝剂,结果表明紫杉醇涂层器械与死亡率之间的相关性并不显著高于非紫杉醇涂层器械(风险比 [HR] 0.992;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.91-1.08)。紫杉醇涂层器械组的截肢事件发生率高于非紫杉醇涂层器械组(HR 1.614;95% CI 1.46-1.78)。在这项分析中,尽管截肢率较高,但 PAD 患者的死亡率与紫杉醇涂层器械的使用无关。