• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

eLIFT 对慢性肝病肝炎症和纤维化的预测性能。

Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Medicine, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 27;18(15):3599-3608. doi: 10.7150/ijms.62386. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7150/ijms.62386
PMID:34522187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8436088/
Abstract

The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD.

摘要

易肝纤维化检测 (eLIFT) 是一种新型的慢性肝病 (CLD) 肝纤维化预测指标。本研究旨在评估 eLIFT 对 CLD 患者肝炎症和纤维化的预测价值。

我们纳入了 1125 例接受肝活检的 CLD 患者。通过 ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic)分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估 eLIFT 对肝炎症(G≥2 和 G≥3)和纤维化(S≥2 和 S4)的预测准确性,并与天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)、纤维化-4 评分(FIB-4)和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值(GPR)进行比较。eLIFT 评估肝炎症 G≥2 和 G≥3 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUROCs)分别为 0.77(0.75-0.80)和 0.81(0.79-0.84),截断值分别为 8.0 和 11.0。eLIFT 预测纤维化分期 S≥2 和 S4 的 AUROCs 分别为 0.72(0.70-0.76)和 0.76(0.72-0.80),截断值分别为 9.0 和 10.0。在区分 G≥2 炎症时,eLIFT 的 AUROC 优于 FIB-4,与 GPR 无差异,但低于 APRI。在区分 G≥3 炎症时,eLIFT 的 AUROC 与 APRI 和 GPR 相当,但优于 FIB-4。四个指标预测 S≥2 和 S4 时无显著差异。

eLIFT 是一种有潜力的用于预测 CLD 患者肝炎症和纤维化的非侵入性指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/53a211bc72bd/ijmsv18p3599g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/a6b263b63bcb/ijmsv18p3599g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/55ec79354174/ijmsv18p3599g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/b964529cdfd1/ijmsv18p3599g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/442acc4ceb00/ijmsv18p3599g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/53a211bc72bd/ijmsv18p3599g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/a6b263b63bcb/ijmsv18p3599g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/55ec79354174/ijmsv18p3599g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/b964529cdfd1/ijmsv18p3599g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/442acc4ceb00/ijmsv18p3599g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48aa/8436088/53a211bc72bd/ijmsv18p3599g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.eLIFT 对慢性肝病肝炎症和纤维化的预测性能。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 27;18(15):3599-3608. doi: 10.7150/ijms.62386. eCollection 2021.
2
The Easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT) for predicting advanced liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.用于预测慢性乙型肝炎患者晚期肝纤维化的简易肝纤维化检测(eLIFT)。
Discov Med. 2019 Sep;28(153):149-158.
3
Comparative evaluation of GPR versus APRI and FIB-4 in predicting different levels of liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.GPR与APRI及FIB-4在预测慢性乙型肝炎不同程度肝纤维化中的比较评估
J Viral Hepat. 2018 May;25(5):581-589. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12842. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
The Gamma-Glutamyl-Transpeptidase to Platelet Ratio Does not Show Advantages than APRI and Fib-4 in Diagnosing Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值在诊断慢性乙型肝炎患者显著纤维化和肝硬化方面并不优于APRI和Fib-4:一项中国的回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(16):e3372. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003372.
5
Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B.基于四个因素以及红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值,在慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化和炎症诊断中,天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值比纤维化指数更具优势。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 May;32(4):e22341. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22341. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值用于慢性乙型肝炎和非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者肝纤维化的无创评估
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25;8(17):28641-28649. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16162.
7
Value of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-to-platelet ratio in diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶/血小板比值在诊断慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化中的价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 7;23(41):7425-7432. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7425.
8
Evaluation of eLIFT for Non-invasive Assessment of Liver fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection.eLIFT 技术用于评估慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者肝纤维化和肝硬化的无创性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 14;7(1):5429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05718-x.
9
The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio predicts liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection patients with high HBV DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels in China.在中国,γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值可预测乙肝e抗原阳性、乙肝病毒DNA水平高且丙氨酸转氨酶水平正常或轻度升高的慢性乙肝病毒感染患者的肝纤维化和肝硬化情况。
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Nov;23(11):912-919. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12563. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) predicts significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic HBV infection in West Africa.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值(GPR)可预测西非慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者的显著肝纤维化和肝硬化。
Gut. 2016 Aug;65(8):1369-76. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309260. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
MANPOWER study: Real-world post-hoc analysis assessing essential phospholipids for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease from the Russian registry.人力研究:一项基于俄罗斯登记处数据的真实世界事后分析,评估非酒精性脂肪性肝病的必需磷脂。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):103217. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i6.103217.
2
Clinical prediction model for progression from henoch-schönlein purpura to nephritis in pediatric patients.小儿过敏性紫癜进展为肾炎的临床预测模型
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7385-7395. doi: 10.62347/XDOR8531. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison and evaluation of non-invasive models in predicting liver inflammation and fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels.预测乙肝病毒DNA水平高且丙氨酸转氨酶水平正常或轻度升高的慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者肝脏炎症和纤维化的非侵入性模型的比较与评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 5;99(23):e20548. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020548.
2
The Easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT) for predicting advanced liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.用于预测慢性乙型肝炎患者晚期肝纤维化的简易肝纤维化检测(eLIFT)。
Discov Med. 2019 Sep;28(153):149-158.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio for predicting hepatitis B-related fibrosis: a meta-analysis.
γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值预测乙型肝炎相关纤维化的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;31(5):599-606. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001381.
4
Evaluation and comparison of thirty noninvasive models for diagnosing liver fibrosis in chinese hepatitis B patients.评估和比较三十种非侵入性模型用于诊断中国乙型肝炎患者的肝纤维化。
J Viral Hepat. 2019 Feb;26(2):297-307. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13031. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
The combination of 5 serum markers compared to FibroScan to predict significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus.与 FibroScan 相比,5 种血清标志物联合预测慢性乙型肝炎病毒患者的显著肝纤维化。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Aug;483:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.04.036. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
6
Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: What we need in the future.非酒精性脂肪性肝病/非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的全球流行病学:我们未来的需求。
Liver Int. 2018 Feb;38 Suppl 1:47-51. doi: 10.1111/liv.13643.
7
Validation and comparison of seventeen noninvasive models for evaluating liver fibrosis in Chinese hepatitis B patients.十七种非侵入性模型评估中国乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化的验证和比较。
Liver Int. 2018 Sep;38(9):1562-1570. doi: 10.1111/liv.13688. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
8
Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B.基于四个因素以及红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值,在慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化和炎症诊断中,天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值比纤维化指数更具优势。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 May;32(4):e22341. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22341. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
9
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Platelet Ratio Predicts Significant Liver Fibrosis of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值可预测中国慢性乙型肝炎患者的显著肝纤维化
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:7089702. doi: 10.1155/2017/7089702. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Reassessment of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR): a large-sample, dynamic study based on liver biopsy in a Chinese population with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值(GPR)的重新评估:一项基于中国慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染人群肝活检的大样本动态研究。
Gut. 2018 May;67(5):989-991. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313896. Epub 2017 Aug 16.