• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类群落的功能多样性随树冠高度增加:从个体行为到大陆尺度格局。

Functional diversity of avian communities increases with canopy height: From individual behavior to continental-scale patterns.

作者信息

Remeš Vladimír, Remešová Eva, Friedman Nicholas R, Matysioková Beata, Rubáčová Lucia

机构信息

Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Faculty of Science Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic.

Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 27;11(17):11839-11851. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7952. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.7952
PMID:34522345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8427649/
Abstract

Vegetation complexity is an important predictor of animal species diversity. Specifically, taller vegetation should provide more potential ecological niches and thus harbor communities with higher species richness and functional diversity (FD). Resource use behavior is an especially important functional trait because it links species to their resource base with direct relevance to niche partitioning. However, it is unclear how exactly the diversity of resource use behavior changes with vegetation complexity. To address this question, we studied avian FD in relation to vegetation complexity along a continental-scale vegetation gradient. We quantified foraging behavior of passerine birds in terms of foraging method and substrate use at 21 sites (63 transects) spanning 3,000 km of woodlands and forests in Australia. We also quantified vegetation structure on 630 sampling points at the same sites. Additionally, we measured morphological traits for all 111 observed species in museum collections. We calculated individual-based, abundance-weighted FD in morphology and foraging behavior and related it to species richness and vegetation complexity (indexed by canopy height) using structural equation modeling, rarefaction analyses, and distance-based metrics. FD of morphology and foraging methods was best predicted by species richness. However, FD of substrate use was best predicted by canopy height (ranging 10-30 m), but only when substrates were categorized with fine resolution (17 categories), not when categorized coarsely (8 categories). These results suggest that, first, FD might increase with vegetation complexity independently of species richness, but whether it does so depends on the studied functional trait. Second, patterns found might be shaped by how finely we categorize functional traits. More complex vegetation provided larger "ecological space" with more resources, allowing the coexistence of more species with disproportionately more diverse foraging substrate use. We suggest that the latter pattern was driven by nonrandom accumulation of functionally distinct species with increasing canopy height.

摘要

植被复杂性是动物物种多样性的重要预测指标。具体而言,更高的植被应提供更多潜在的生态位,从而容纳具有更高物种丰富度和功能多样性(FD)的群落。资源利用行为是一个特别重要的功能性状,因为它将物种与其资源基础联系起来,与生态位划分直接相关。然而,资源利用行为的多样性究竟如何随植被复杂性而变化尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们沿着大陆尺度的植被梯度研究了鸟类功能多样性与植被复杂性的关系。我们在澳大利亚绵延3000公里的林地和森林中的21个地点(63个样带),根据觅食方法和底物利用情况对雀形目鸟类的觅食行为进行了量化。我们还对相同地点内630个采样点的植被结构进行了量化。此外,我们测量了博物馆馆藏中所有111个观察物种的形态特征。我们使用结构方程模型、稀疏分析和基于距离的指标,计算了基于个体的、丰度加权的形态和觅食行为功能多样性,并将其与物种丰富度和植被复杂性(以冠层高度为指标)相关联。形态和觅食方法的功能多样性最好由物种丰富度预测。然而,底物利用的功能多样性最好由冠层高度(范围为10 - 30米)预测,但只有当底物以精细分辨率分类(17类)时才成立,粗分类(8类)时则不然。这些结果表明,首先,功能多样性可能会随着植被复杂性的增加而独立于物种丰富度增加,但情况是否如此取决于所研究的功能性状。其次,发现的模式可能受到我们对功能性状分类精细程度的影响。更复杂的植被提供了更大的“生态空间”和更多资源,使得更多具有不成比例的更多样化觅食底物利用方式的物种能够共存。我们认为后一种模式是由功能不同的物种随着冠层高度增加的非随机积累驱动的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/6db0d3c8c92b/ECE3-11-11839-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/d5fc69633e8b/ECE3-11-11839-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/bb8433154392/ECE3-11-11839-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/99cda4a7d8f2/ECE3-11-11839-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/5467e1356b6b/ECE3-11-11839-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/6db0d3c8c92b/ECE3-11-11839-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/d5fc69633e8b/ECE3-11-11839-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/bb8433154392/ECE3-11-11839-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/99cda4a7d8f2/ECE3-11-11839-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/5467e1356b6b/ECE3-11-11839-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7468/8427649/6db0d3c8c92b/ECE3-11-11839-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional diversity of avian communities increases with canopy height: From individual behavior to continental-scale patterns.鸟类群落的功能多样性随树冠高度增加:从个体行为到大陆尺度格局。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 27;11(17):11839-11851. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7952. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Opposing Responses of Bird Functional Diversity to Vegetation Structural Diversity in Wet and Dry Forest.干湿森林中鸟类功能多样性对植被结构多样性的相反响应
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164917. eCollection 2016.
3
Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water availability, vegetation, and topography on avian diversity.解析水分供应、植被和地形对鸟类多样性的直接和间接影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33671-w.
4
Specialization and niche overlap across spatial scales: Revealing ecological factors shaping species richness and coexistence in Australian songbirds.跨空间尺度的专业化和生态位重叠:揭示影响澳大利亚鸣禽物种丰富度和共存的生态因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Nov;88(11):1766-1776. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13073. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Bird functional diversity decreases with time since disturbance: Does patchy prescribed fire enhance ecosystem function?鸟类功能多样性随干扰后时间的推移而减少:斑块状计划火烧会增强生态系统功能吗?
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jan;26(1):115-27. doi: 10.1890/14-1562.
6
The formation of "mega-flocks" depends on vegetation structure in montane coniferous forests of Taiwan.“超级鸟群”的形成取决于台湾山地针叶林的植被结构。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 18;12(2):e8608. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8608. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
The influence of vegetation height heterogeneity on forest and woodland bird species richness across the United States.美国植被高度异质性对森林和林地鸟类物种丰富度的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):e103236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103236. eCollection 2014.
8
Functional response traits and altered ecological niches drive the disassembly of cloud forest bird communities in tropical montane countrysides.功能反应特征和生态位改变导致热带山地农村云林鸟类群落解体。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2314-2328. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13816. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
9
Decoupled spatiotemporal patterns of avian taxonomic and functional diversity.鸟类分类和功能多样性的解耦时空模式
Curr Biol. 2023 Mar 27;33(6):1153-1161.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.01.066. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
10
EVI and NDVI as proxies for multifaceted avian diversity in urban areas.EVI 和 NDVI 作为城市中多方面鸟类多样性的代表。
Ecol Appl. 2023 Apr;33(3):e2808. doi: 10.1002/eap.2808. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Habitat Structure Drives Avian Functional and Trait Diversity Across North America.三维栖息地结构驱动北美地区鸟类功能和性状多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 23;15(4):e70988. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70988. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Forest structure, plants, arthropods, scale, or birds' functional groups: What key factor are forest birds responding to?森林结构、植物、节肢动物、鳞片或鸟类功能群:森林鸟类对什么关键因素做出反应?
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304421. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers and dynamics of a massive adaptive radiation in cichlid fishes.慈鲷鱼类大规模适应性辐射的驱动力和动态。
Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7840):76-81. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2930-4. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Evolution of a multifunctional trait: shared effects of foraging ecology and thermoregulation on beak morphology, with consequences for song evolution.多功能性状的进化:觅食生态学和体温调节对喙形态的共同影响,以及对歌唱进化的后果。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 18;286(1917):20192474. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2474.
3
Common latitudinal gradients in functional richness and functional evenness across marine and terrestrial systems.
海洋和陆地系统中功能丰富度和功能均匀度的常见纬度梯度。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;286(1908):20190745. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0745. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Specialization and niche overlap across spatial scales: Revealing ecological factors shaping species richness and coexistence in Australian songbirds.跨空间尺度的专业化和生态位重叠:揭示影响澳大利亚鸣禽物种丰富度和共存的生态因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Nov;88(11):1766-1776. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13073. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water availability, vegetation, and topography on avian diversity.解析水分供应、植被和地形对鸟类多样性的直接和间接影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33671-w.
6
The importance of individual and species-level traits for trophic niches among herbivorous coral reef fishes.个体和物种水平特征对草食性珊瑚礁鱼类营养生态位的重要性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 14;284(1856). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0307.
7
The convergent trajectories of bird communities along ecological successions in european forests.欧洲森林中鸟类群落沿生态演替的趋同轨迹。
Oecologia. 1988 Feb;75(1):83-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00378818.
8
Radiating despite a Lack of Character: Ecological Divergence among Closely Related, Morphologically Similar Honeyeaters (Aves: Meliphagidae) Co-occurring in Arid Australian Environments.尽管缺乏明显特征仍呈辐射状分布:在澳大利亚干旱环境中共存的亲缘关系密切、形态相似的吸蜜鸟(鸟类:吸蜜鸟科)之间的生态分化
Am Nat. 2017 Feb;189(2):E14-E30. doi: 10.1086/690008. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
9
Do Hypervolumes Have Holes?超体积有漏洞吗?
Am Nat. 2016 Apr;187(4):E93-105. doi: 10.1086/685444. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
Disentangling vegetation diversity from climate-energy and habitat heterogeneity for explaining animal geographic patterns.为解释动物地理格局,从气候能量和栖息地异质性中厘清植被多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Feb 9;6(5):1515-26. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1972. eCollection 2016 Mar.