• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雅培依维莫司洗脱支架植入的长期(超过5年)临床影响。

Long-term (beyond 5 years) clinical impact of Xience everolimus-eluting stent implantation.

作者信息

Matsuda Hiroaki, Suzuki Yoriyasu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Nagoya Heart Center Nagoya Japan.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 8;4(3):e365. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.365. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.365
PMID:34522790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8425589/
Abstract

OBJECTS

We aim at examining the long-term clinical outcome after Xience everolimus-eluting stent (X-EES) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Long-term clinical outcomes beyond 5 years after X-EES implantation remain unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study has collected data from 1184 consecutive patients, corresponding to 1463 lesions, who were treated with X-EES alone in the Nagoya Heart Center between January 2010 and December 2013. The primary endpoint was the 10-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR). Definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was evaluated as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of TLF was recorded to be 12.4%, whereas that of cardiac death, target vessel MI, and clinically indicated TLR was at 4.4%, 4.1%, and 7.8%, respectively. The cumulative rate of definite/probable ST was observed to remain low (0.3% at 30 days; 0.3% at 1 year; 0.6% at 5 years; and 1.1% at 10 years). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors of TLF were insulin-treated diabetes (hazard ratio (HR), 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13-3.29;  = .02), left ventricular dysfunction (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.43-3.62;  < .01), hemodialysis (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.39-3.56;  < .01), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.41;  < .01), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.69;  < .01), severe calcification (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.36-3.09;  < .01), and in-stent restenosis (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.64-4.89;  < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rates of the long-term adverse effects after X-EES implantation, such as late TLR and ST, were determined to be low in this study; however, they increased over time until 10 years after stent implantation.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究雅培依维莫司洗脱支架(X-EES)植入后的长期临床结局。

背景

X-EES植入5年后的长期临床结局仍不明确。

方法

这项回顾性研究收集了2010年1月至2013年12月期间在名古屋心脏中心接受单纯X-EES治疗的1184例连续患者(对应1463处病变)的数据。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF)的10年累积发生率,定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(MI)和临床指征的靶病变血运重建(TLR)。明确/可能的支架血栓形成(ST)被评估为次要结局。

结果

10年时,TLF的累积发生率为12.4%,而心源性死亡、靶血管MI和临床指征的TLR的累积发生率分别为4.4%、4.1%和7.8%。明确/可能的ST的累积发生率一直较低(30天时为0.3%;1年时为0.3%;5年时为0.6%;10年时为1.1%)。在多变量分析中,TLF的危险因素包括胰岛素治疗的糖尿病(风险比[HR],1.93;95%置信区间[CI],1.13 - 3.29;P = 0.02)、左心室功能障碍(HR,2.28;95% CI,1.43 - 3.62;P < 0.01)、血液透析(HR,2.22;95% CI,1.39 - 3.56;P < 0.01)、既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HR,1.68;95% CI,1.18 - 2.41;P < 0.01)、外周血管疾病(HR,1.70;95% CI,1.07 - 2.69;P < 0.01)、严重钙化(HR,2.08;95% CI,1.36 - 3.09;P < 0.01)和支架内再狭窄(HR,2.93;95% CI,1.64 - 4.89;P < 0.01)。

结论

本研究确定X-EES植入后的长期不良反应发生率,如晚期TLR和ST较低;然而,这些不良反应发生率在支架植入后直至10年期间随时间增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/b36890b7b8f7/HSR2-4-e365-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/2d2dc6fa27de/HSR2-4-e365-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/8fc19f8d47b8/HSR2-4-e365-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/b36890b7b8f7/HSR2-4-e365-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/2d2dc6fa27de/HSR2-4-e365-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/8fc19f8d47b8/HSR2-4-e365-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ab/8425589/b36890b7b8f7/HSR2-4-e365-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term (beyond 5 years) clinical impact of Xience everolimus-eluting stent implantation.雅培依维莫司洗脱支架植入的长期(超过5年)临床影响。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 8;4(3):e365. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.365. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
3
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架置入后不良事件的时间趋势:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2017 May 30;135(22):2145-2154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028479.
5
Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study.与可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相比,耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的中期临床影响:一项 3 年倾向性匹配研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 20;2020:2869303. doi: 10.1155/2020/2869303. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Korea Acute Myocardial infarction Registry (KAMIR).Resolute Onyx 佐他莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗急性心肌梗死患者的短期临床结局比较:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究(KAMIR)的结果。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):469-476. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0053. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
8
Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: pooled results from the SPIRIT (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice) Trials.比较急性和稳定型冠状动脉综合征患者中依维莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架的疗效:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)和 COMPARE(依维莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架在日常实践中用于冠状动脉血运重建的比较试验)研究的汇总结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.018.
9
Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).全患者人群行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后第一代或第二代药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架植入术后 2 年的结果:来自 PRODIGY 研究(支架内内膜增生分级后延长双联抗血小板治疗研究)的预先指定分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results From SORT OUT IV.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:SORT OUT IV 研究 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):751-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.051.

引用本文的文献

1
A predictive model involving serum uric acid, C-reactive protein, diabetes, hypercholesteremia, multiple lesions for restenosis risk in everolimus-eluting stent-treated coronary heart disease patients.一种涉及血清尿酸、C反应蛋白、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症的预测模型,用于预测依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的冠心病患者再狭窄风险的多个病变情况。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 11;9:857922. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.857922. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2503-2510. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30474-X. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
7-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing the First-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the New-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stent: The RESET Trial.第一代西罗莫司洗脱支架与新一代依维莫司洗脱支架随机对照试验的 7 年结果:RESET 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):637-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.234.
3
Impact of post-procedural minimal stent area on 2-year clinical outcomes in the SYNTAX II trial.
SYNTAX II 试验中术后最小支架面积对 2 年临床结局的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):E225-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28105. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Quantification of thrombus formation in malapposed coronary stents deployed in vitro through imaging analysis.通过成像分析对体外部署的贴壁不良冠状动脉支架中的血栓形成进行定量分析。
J Biomech. 2018 Apr 11;71:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.044. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Results From the PLATINUM Trial.PLATINUM 试验:冠状动脉疾病中铂铬依维莫司洗脱支架的长期安全性和疗效:5 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2392-2400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.070.
6
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
7
Final 5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice: The COMPARE Trial (A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice).最终 5 年随访:依维莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架在日常实践中用于冠状动脉血运重建的随机对照试验:COMPARE 试验(依维莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇支架在日常实践中用于冠状动脉血运重建的试验)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1157-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Correlates and outcomes of late and very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from DESERT (International Drug-Eluting Stent Event Registry of Thrombosis).晚期和极晚期药物洗脱支架血栓形成的相关因素和结果:DESERT(国际药物洗脱支架血栓形成事件注册研究)的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):1093-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Stent-related defects in patients presenting with stent thrombosis: differences at optical coherence tomography between subacute and late/very late thrombosis in the Mechanism Of Stent Thrombosis (MOST) study.光学相干断层扫描在机制性支架血栓形成(MOST)研究中对亚急性和迟发/极迟发支架血栓患者支架相关缺陷的比较。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Dec;9(8):936-44. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I8A157.
10
Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients.裸金属支架、第一代药物洗脱支架和第二代药物洗脱支架的支架血栓形成风险:来自 18334 名患者的注册研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.015.