Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Milan, Italy.
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jan;15(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/cts.13131. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
Data regarding double switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to IFX biosimilars in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 and subsequently to SB2 (double switch) in patients with IBD. Patients undergoing IFX-double switch in eight Centers in Lombardy (Italy) from November 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The IFX discontinuation rate, incidence and type of adverse events (AEs), and clinical remission rate were recorded. A comparison with a control group of patients with IBD single-switched from originator IFX to CT-P13 was performed, before and after an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-based propensity score analysis. Fifty-two double-switched patients with IBD were enrolled. The 24- and 52-week proportions of patients continuing on IFX therapy following the second switch (CTP13 → SB2) were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94%-100%) and 90% (95% CI 81%-99%), respectively. Four patients experienced a total of five AEs, all graded 1-3 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). No infusion reactions were observed. The 24-week and follow-up end clinical remission rates following the second switch were 94% and 88%, respectively. No differences were observed in the safety and efficacy outcomes by comparing the double-switch group with a single-switch group of 66 patients with IBD; all these results were confirmed by IPTW-adjusted analysis. The study suggests both the safety and efficacy of the double switch from originator IFX to CT-P13 and SB2 in patients with IBD is maintained. This strategy may be associated with potential cost implications.
关于炎症性肠病(IBD)中从原研英夫利昔单抗(IFX)切换至 IFX 生物类似药再切换至另一种 IFX 生物类似药(双切换)的数据较为缺乏。本研究旨在评估 IBD 患者从原研 IFX 切换至 CT-P13 后再切换至 SB2(双切换)的安全性和疗效。回顾性分析了 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月期间,来自意大利伦巴第地区的 8 家中心的 52 例接受 IFX 双切换的 IBD 患者。记录 IFX 停药率、不良事件(AE)的发生率和类型以及临床缓解率。在基于逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)倾向评分分析前后,与接受从原研 IFX 单切换至 CT-P13 的 IBD 患者对照组进行了比较。纳入 52 例 IBD 双切换患者。继第二次切换(CTP13→SB2)后,继续接受 IFX 治疗的患者在第 24 周和第 52 周的比例分别为 98%(95%可信区间[CI]94%-100%)和 90%(95%CI81%-99%)。共有 4 例患者共发生了 5 次 AE,根据不良事件常用术语标准(CTCAE),所有 AE 均为 1-3 级。未观察到输注反应。继第二次切换后,第 24 周和随访结束时的临床缓解率分别为 94%和 88%。与 IBD 患者的 66 例单切换组比较,双切换组在安全性和疗效方面无差异;所有这些结果均通过 IPTW 调整分析得到证实。该研究表明,从原研 IFX 切换至 CT-P13 和 SB2 对 IBD 患者而言,双切换方案具有安全性和疗效。这种策略可能与潜在的成本影响相关。