Wei Peijian, Ma Jiexu, Tan Tong, Xie Nianjin, Chen Zhao, Zhang Yuyuan, Liu Yanjun, Wu Hongxiang, Chen Jimei, Zhuang Jian, Liu Jian, Guo Huiming
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangzhou, China.
Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(8):5055-5063. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-975.
Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system.
From May 2020 to January 2021, 21 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent transapical TM-VIVI without concomitant procedures at Guangdong Provincial People's hospital. The mean age was 74.62 years. All patients were heavily symptomatic with severe mitral regurgitation and increased trans-prosthetic gradient. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroScore II) scores were used and predicted high mortality (STS PROM, 12.91%±9.94%; EuroScore II, 12.04%±10.5%). All the procedures were performed in a hybrid room.
The success rate was 100% with no conversion to median sternotomy and no intraprocedural death. The mean ventilation time and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 25±21.44 minutes and 4.14±7.08 days, respectively. No major postoperative complications were observed, except 1 patient suffered pneumonia and required tracheostomy. All patients recovered well. Postoperative echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics with no residual mitral regurgitation in 19 patients and mild regurgitation in 2 patients. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences among procedural and postoperative outcomes were detected in patients with previous aortic-mitral double valve replacement (DVR) compared to other patients.
Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system, even in patients following DVR.
二尖瓣生物瓣功能障碍传统上采用再次手术二尖瓣置换术(SMVR)治疗。经导管二尖瓣瓣中瓣植入术(TM-VIVI)正在成为高危患者SMVR的替代方案。我们报告使用J-Valve系统经心尖TM-VIVI的经验。
2020年5月至2021年1月,21例二尖瓣生物瓣功能障碍患者在广东省人民医院接受了经心尖TM-VIVI,未同期进行其他手术。平均年龄为74.62岁。所有患者均有严重症状,伴有严重二尖瓣反流和跨瓣压差增加。使用胸外科医师协会预测的死亡风险(STS PROM)和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroScore II)评分,预测死亡率较高(STS PROM,12.91%±9.94%;EuroScore II,12.04%±10.5%)。所有手术均在杂交手术室进行。
成功率为100%,无一例转为正中开胸,术中无死亡。平均通气时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间分别为25±21.44分钟和4.14±7.08天。除1例患者发生肺炎并需要气管切开外,未观察到重大术后并发症。所有患者恢复良好。术后超声心动图显示血流动力学良好,19例患者无残余二尖瓣反流,2例患者有轻度反流。在亚组分析中,与其他患者相比,既往有主动脉-二尖瓣双瓣置换术(DVR)的患者在手术和术后结果方面未发现显著差异。
我们的结果表明,即使是DVR术后患者,使用J-Valve系统经心尖TM-VIVI也是安全可行的。