• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A single-center analysis of outcomes, risk factors, and new valves in Asian patients treated with early transcatheter aortic valve implantation.亚洲患者早期经导管主动脉瓣植入治疗的结局、危险因素及新型瓣膜的单中心分析
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Aug;11(4):967-979. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-928.
2
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
3
Comparison of Valve Durability and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Less-Than-High-Risk for Surgery.严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险较低的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的瓣膜耐久性和结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1202-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients: a German Aortic Valve Registry analysis.经导管或外科主动脉瓣植入术在慢性透析患者中的应用:德国主动脉瓣登记分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar;110(3):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01717-7. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Real-World Clinical Practice.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗真实世界临床实践中的重度主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):806-814. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0951. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
7
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
9
Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: A long-term propensity score-matched analysis.低风险患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术:一项长期倾向评分匹配分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):E1033-E1043. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29948. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
10
Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后与外科主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的起搏特点及当前起搏实践模式比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):E385-E390. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27915. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Outcomes and Challenges in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在亚洲的结果与挑战:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;24(3):79. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403079. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in China - a review of the available evidence.中国经导管主动脉瓣置换术——现有证据综述
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Jul 26;10(2):110-118. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00049. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure native aortic regurgitation: one-year outcomes of a single-center study.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术治疗单纯性主动脉瓣反流:单中心研究的 1 年结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03329-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Appropriateness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的适宜性:来自OCEAN-TAVI注册研究的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006146. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
"The changing paradigm": TAVR for low-risk patients approved by the FDA.“不断变化的模式”:经美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于低风险患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):5-7. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14336. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
Incidence of, risk factors for and impact of readmission for heart failure after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心力衰竭再入院的发生率、危险因素及影响。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Dec;112(12):765-772. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
5
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Early Postprocedural Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与早期术后卒中性的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2306-2315. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7525.
6
Oral Anticoagulant Type and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后口服抗凝药物类型与结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 26;12(16):1566-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
7
VitaFlow™ transcatheter valve system in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: One-year results of a multicenter study.经导管 VitaFlow™ 瓣膜系统治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:多中心研究的一年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95(2):332-338. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28226. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
9
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
10
Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Asia Pacific: Current Practice and Perspectives.经导管瓣膜置换术在亚太地区:当前的实践和观点。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3189-3199. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.065.

亚洲患者早期经导管主动脉瓣植入治疗的结局、危险因素及新型瓣膜的单中心分析

A single-center analysis of outcomes, risk factors, and new valves in Asian patients treated with early transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

作者信息

Liang Ying, Wang Wei, Wang Xu, Hei Feilong, Guan Yulong

机构信息

Department of Extracorporeal Circulation, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Structural Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Aug;11(4):967-979. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-928.

DOI:10.21037/cdt-20-928
PMID:34527520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues to expand as an optimal treatment in Western countries; however, Asian countries have been slower to adopt this procedure. This research aimed to explore the outcomes and status of early TAVI performed at a single center in Asia, and provide comparative outcomes of the newly designed Chinese valves.

METHODS

We enrolled 175 consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVI from September 2012 to January 2018 at Fuwai Hospital (Beijing, China). After a preliminary assessment of age, we included 109 older patients (≥69 years) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) during the same period. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce potential bias. Cox regression was used to identify the risk factors of a poor prognosis.

RESULTS

The TAVI cohort had higher rates of all-cause mortality [11.4% 2.4%, hazard ratio (HR): 4.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47 to 15.57, IPTW-adjusted P=0.009] and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI; 14.6% 1.6%, HR: 9.98, 95% CI: 2.71 to 36.67, IPTW-adjusted P<0.001) at 3 years than the SAVR cohort. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis based on the entire sample, liver disease was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 5.080, 95% CI: 1.067 to 24.174, P=0.041). A smoking history was associated with an increased risk of postoperative heart failure (HF) (HR: 4.902, 95% CI: 1.265 to 18.999, P=0.022). Additionally, age (HR: 1.141, 95% CI: 1.010 to 1.288, P=0.034) and diabetes (HR: 7.301, 95% CI: 2.414 to 22.079, P<0.001) were identified as predictors of postoperative stroke. In the new valve subgroups, the 1-year composite endpoints were 38.2% (Venus A), 35.3% (TaurusOne), 34% (J-Valve), and 28% (VitaFlow) (P=0.857).

CONCLUSIONS

Not all TAVI procedures had satisfactory outcomes compared with SAVR when initiated. At first, our center faced some challenges in delivering TAVI, and this is probably one of the reasons why the use of TAVI has developed slowly in Asia. Further investigations are needed to explore the underlying factors precluding the rapid expansion of TAVI in Asia.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)在西方国家作为一种最佳治疗方法,其应用范围持续扩大;然而,亚洲国家采用该手术的进程较为缓慢。本研究旨在探讨亚洲某单一中心早期TAVI的治疗效果及现状,并提供新设计的国产瓣膜的对比疗效。

方法

我们纳入了2012年9月至2018年1月期间在阜外医院(中国北京)成功接受TAVI的175例连续患者。在对年龄进行初步评估后,我们纳入了同期接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的109例老年患者(≥69岁)。主要终点为全因死亡率。采用治疗权重反概率法(IPTW)以减少潜在偏倚。使用Cox回归分析确定预后不良的危险因素。

结果

TAVI队列在3年时的全因死亡率[11.4% 对2.4%,风险比(HR):4.79,95%置信区间(CI):1.47至15.57,IPTW调整后P = 0.009]和永久起搏器植入率(PPI;14.6% 对1.6%,HR:9.98,95% CI:2.71至36.67,IPTW调整后P < 0.001)均高于SAVR队列。在基于整个样本的多变量Cox回归分析中,肝病与全因死亡率相关(HR:5.080,95% CI:1.067至24.174,P = 0.041)。吸烟史与术后心力衰竭(HF)风险增加相关(HR:4.902,95% CI:1.265至18.999,P = 0.022)。此外,年龄(HR:1.141,95% CI:1.010至1.288,P = 0.034)和糖尿病(HR:7.301,95% CI:2.414至22.079,P < 0.001)被确定为术后卒中的预测因素。在新瓣膜亚组中,1年复合终点分别为38.2%(Venus A)、35.3%(TaurusOne)、34%(J-Valve)和28%(VitaFlow)(P = 0.857)。

结论

与SAVR相比,并非所有的TAVI手术一开始都能取得令人满意的效果。起初,我们中心在开展TAVI时面临一些挑战,这可能是TAVI在亚洲发展缓慢的原因之一。需要进一步研究以探索阻碍TAVI在亚洲快速推广的潜在因素。