• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚一项多中心研究的伦理与治理:应对艰难险阻。

Ethics and governance for a multi-site study in Australia: Navigating the snakes and ladders.

作者信息

Samir Nora, Amarasena Lahiru, Sealy Louise, Hodgins Michael, Gelaw Yalemzewod, Lingam Raghu, Zwi Karen

机构信息

School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Community Child Health, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jan;58(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15747. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.15747
PMID:34529302
Abstract

Multi-site research studies are essential if we are to conduct national research across all Australian jurisdictions. There is widespread agreement among clinicians and researchers that obtaining essential approvals to conduct multi-site research studies in Australia can be complex, bureaucratic and time consuming. Although there is inherent value in the review process, resources and months of valuable research time are often expended long before the study has begun. Using our recent experience for a multi-site, longitudinal paediatric cohort study of children and adolescents who were detained in offshore immigration detention on Nauru, we describe the process of navigating the ethics and governance approval systems. We identify tips for researchers and clinicians conducting multi-site studies, including early consultation with ethics and governance committees, using their recommended templates, anticipating time delays, and commencing time consuming processes as early as permissible. Our recommendations at the systemic level include streamlined and integrated ethics and governance review processes for all Australian jurisdictions, with co-ordinated requests for further information, a standardised approach across all Research Governance Offices, a rapid system for addressing amendments and individualised study support and consultations. Above all, a nationally agreed framework whereby ethics and governance committees across jurisdictions communicate with each other, use the same electronic platform and present a unified process whilst protecting the welfare, rights, dignity and safety of research participants is required. The complexity of the current ethics and governance processes may inadvertently and unintentionally be a barrier to conducting ethical research.

摘要

如果我们要在澳大利亚所有司法管辖区开展全国性研究,多地点研究至关重要。临床医生和研究人员普遍认为,在澳大利亚获得开展多地点研究的必要批准可能复杂、官僚且耗时。尽管审查过程有其内在价值,但在研究开始之前,往往就已经耗费了资源和数月宝贵的研究时间。利用我们最近对瑙鲁境外移民拘留中心被拘留的儿童和青少年进行多地点纵向儿科队列研究的经验,我们描述了通过伦理和管理审批系统的过程。我们为开展多地点研究的研究人员和临床医生提供了一些建议,包括尽早与伦理和管理委员会协商、使用他们推荐的模板、预估时间延迟,并尽早开始耗时的流程。我们在系统层面的建议包括为澳大利亚所有司法管辖区简化和整合伦理和管理审查流程,协调进一步信息请求,所有研究管理办公室采用标准化方法,建立快速处理修正案的系统以及提供个性化的研究支持和咨询。最重要的是,需要一个全国商定的框架,使各司法管辖区的伦理和管理委员会能够相互沟通,使用相同的电子平台,并呈现统一的流程,同时保护研究参与者的福利、权利、尊严和安全。当前伦理和管理流程的复杂性可能会无意中成为开展符合伦理研究的障碍。

相似文献

1
Ethics and governance for a multi-site study in Australia: Navigating the snakes and ladders.澳大利亚一项多中心研究的伦理与治理:应对艰难险阻。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jan;58(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15747. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Challenges in obtaining research ethics and governance approvals for an Australian national intersector, multisite audit study.为一项澳大利亚全国性跨部门、多地点审计研究获取研究伦理与管理批准面临的挑战。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Sep;44(5):799-805. doi: 10.1071/AH20022.
3
Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.澳大利亚特定研究地点审批中的不一致和时间延迟,阻碍了协作性临床研究。
Intern Med J. 2016 Sep;46(9):1023-9. doi: 10.1111/imj.13191.
4
Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.多中心伦理和研究治理审查可能会阻碍非干预性临床研究。
Intern Med J. 2019 Jun;49(6):722-728. doi: 10.1111/imj.14158.
5
Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.伦理问题:多中心低风险伦理/治理审查流程与AMOSS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01390.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.研究审批的冰山:在英格兰,一项“低调”的研究为何需要 89 名专业人员来批准,以及我们如何才能做得更好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5.
7
Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.研究治理授权:下一个前沿。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):389-392. doi: 10.1071/AH20129.
8
Clinical trials with cannabis medicines-guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: considerations from the Australian experience.大麻药物临床试验——伦理委员会、治理官员和研究人员简化伦理申请和确保患者安全的指南:来自澳大利亚经验的考虑。
Trials. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04862-6.
9
Heterogeneity of Human Research Ethics Committees and Research Governance Offices across Australia: An observational study.澳大利亚各地人类研究伦理委员会和研究管理办公室的异质性:一项观察性研究。
Australas Med J. 2016 Feb 29;9(2):33-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2587. eCollection 2016.
10
Variation in Human Research Ethics Committee and governance processes throughout Australia: a need for a uniform approach.澳大利亚人类研究伦理委员会及治理流程的多样性:需要采取统一方法。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2263-2268. doi: 10.1111/ans.16842. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
IRB challenges in multisite studies: A case report and commentary from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA).多中心研究中的机构审查委员会挑战:来自爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究智力残疾补充项目(IDS-TILDA)的病例报告与评论
HRB Open Res. 2024 Feb 12;7:3. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13854.1. eCollection 2024.
2
How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations.如何构建大型团队科学:大规模合作实用指南
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):230235. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230235. eCollection 2023 Jun.