School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens.
School of Communication Science & Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Oct 4;64(10):3803-3825. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00013. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
Purpose This review was designed to provide a systematic overview of prosody in people with a primary diagnosis of dementia (PwD) and evaluate the potential use of prosodic features for diagnosis of dementia. Method A systematic search of five databases was conducted using Medical Subject Headings and keywords. Studies included in the review were evaluated for their methodological quality using the modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Results A total of 14 articles were identified as being relevant for this review. Among the 14 articles, the methodological quality ranged, with eight rated as weak, four rated as moderate, and two rated as strong. Ten of the 14 articles had people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) as participants, and the remaining four had people with frontotemporal dementia as participants. Four articles focused on receptive prosody, another six focused on expressive prosody, and the remaining four articles were investigations into both. The 14 articles presented inconsistent findings, and various tasks were used to measure prosodic features in PwD in the articles. Prosody was studied as a diagnostic tool for dementia in four of the articles, all of which were based on expressive prosody in individuals with AD. Among the four articles, three proposed the use of automatic speech analysis for diagnosis of AD. Conclusions This review demonstrates that prosody in PwD is an underinvestigated area. In particular, it was concerning that most articles were of weak methodological quality. Nevertheless, it was found that prosody may be a potential diagnostic tool for assessing dementia. More studies that replicate the existing studies and those with stronger methodology are needed to confirm that receptive and/or expressive prosody can be used for dementia diagnosis.
本综述旨在系统地概述原发性痴呆症(PwD)患者的韵律特征,并评估韵律特征在痴呆症诊断中的潜在应用。
使用医学主题词和关键词对五个数据库进行了系统搜索。综述中纳入的研究使用修改后的 Joanna Briggs 研究所清单评估其方法学质量。
共确定了 14 篇与本综述相关的文章。在这 14 篇文章中,方法学质量参差不齐,其中 8 篇被评为弱,4 篇被评为中,2 篇被评为强。14 篇文章中有 10 篇的参与者为阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者,其余 4 篇的参与者为额颞叶痴呆患者。4 篇文章关注接受性韵律,6 篇文章关注表达性韵律,其余 4 篇文章则同时关注两者。14 篇文章的结果不一致,并且文章中使用了各种任务来测量 PwD 的韵律特征。其中 4 篇文章将韵律作为诊断痴呆的工具进行了研究,均基于 AD 患者的表达性韵律。在这 4 篇文章中,有 3 篇提出使用自动语音分析来诊断 AD。
本综述表明,PwD 的韵律是一个研究不足的领域。特别是,大多数文章的方法学质量较弱,这令人担忧。然而,研究发现,韵律可能是评估痴呆的潜在诊断工具。需要更多的研究来复制现有的研究,并采用更具方法学的研究来证实接受性和/或表达性韵律可用于痴呆症诊断。