Pneumology Department, Azienda USL Toscana Sud-Est, "Misericordia" Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; Experimental Medicine and Systems, "PhD Program" Department of Systems Medicine University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Italy.
Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine, Azienda USL Toscana Sud-Est, "Misericordia" Hospital, Grosseto, Italy.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;71:102076. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102076. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
Given COPD heterogeneity, we do not know if some LABA/LAMAs are more suitable for some COPD phenotypes. This real-life database study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the 4 LABA/LAMA effectiveness and highlight possible specificities that could better guide us in choosing the right LABA/LAMA to be used.
We searched for subjects (1,779) adherent to umeclidinium/vilanterol (UM/VI), indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY), aclidinium/formoterol (ACLI/FOR) and tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) treatments in our prescribing/dispensing database. Prescriptions for systemic corticosteroids (SC), antibiotics and salbutamol during one year of LABA/LAMA treatment were analyzed.
A better adherence was found in individuals taking IND/GLY (10.42 ± 1.86 packages/year) compared with UM/VI (10.09 ± 1.9; p = 0.008), ACLI/FOR (9.8 ± 1.8; p = 0.001) and TIO/OLO (10.1 ± 2.1; p = 0.047). The number of patients that were prescribed at least one package of SC/year and their package numbers/year were similar in males/females, across age groups and in "non-frequent exacerbators" with the 4 LABA/LAMAs. More SC were taken by frequent exacerbators, whereas fewer SC/antibiotic packages were prescribed to subjects aged >80 years with all treatments. In patients treated with ACLI/FOR or TIO/OLO, lower risks to having antibiotic prescriptions were observed when UM/VI (0.698[0.516-0.945] and 0.696[0.491-0.985; p = 0.020 and p = 0.041) and IND/GLY (0.597[0.445-0.802] and 0.595[0.423-0.836]; p = 0.001 and p = 0.003) were considered as landmarks. Lower risks for salbutamol prescriptions were detected with UM/VI (0.678[0.480-0.958]; p = 0.027) and TIO/OLO (0.585[0.365-0.937]; p = 0.026) when ACLI/FOR was used as a reference.
According to our retrospective database study, each LABA/LAMA could have a specific efficacy profile in COPD that might be considered for personalized therapy. However, head-to-head targeted trials aimed to assess the impact of different LABA/LAMAs on COPD are needed to confirm/disprove such results.
鉴于 COPD 的异质性,我们尚不清楚某些 LABA/LAMA 是否更适合某些 COPD 表型。本真实世界数据库研究旨在回顾性评估 4 种 LABA/LAMA 的疗效,并强调可能存在的特异性,以便更好地指导我们选择合适的 LABA/LAMA。
我们在处方/配药数据库中搜索了 1779 例坚持使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UM/VI)、茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(IND/GLY)、阿地溴铵/福莫特罗(ACLI/FOR)和噻托溴铵/奥达特罗(TIO/OLO)治疗的患者。分析了在 LABA/LAMA 治疗的 1 年内使用全身皮质类固醇(SC)、抗生素和沙丁胺醇的处方情况。
与 UM/VI(10.09±1.9;p=0.008)、ACLI/FOR(9.8±1.8;p=0.001)和 TIO/OLO(10.1±2.1;p=0.047)相比,服用 IND/GLY 的患者具有更好的依从性(10.42±1.86 包/年)。男女之间、各年龄段之间以及 4 种 LABA/LAMA 治疗的“非频繁加重者”中,至少使用 1 包 SC/年的患者数量及其每年使用的 SC 包数相似。频繁加重者使用的 SC 更多,而使用 ACLI/FOR 或 TIO/OLO 的患者年龄大于 80 岁时,使用的 SC/抗生素包更少。与 ACLI/FOR 或 TIO/OLO 相比,当 UM/VI(0.698[0.516-0.945]和 0.696[0.491-0.985;p=0.020 和 p=0.041)和 IND/GLY(0.597[0.445-0.802]和 0.595[0.423-0.836;p=0.001 和 p=0.003)被视为标志物时,使用 UM/VI(0.678[0.480-0.958];p=0.027)和 TIO/OLO(0.585[0.365-0.937];p=0.026)时,发生沙丁胺醇处方的风险较低。
根据我们的回顾性数据库研究,每种 LABA/LAMA 在 COPD 中可能具有特定的疗效特征,可考虑用于个体化治疗。然而,需要开展旨在评估不同 LABA/LAMAs 对 COPD 影响的头对头靶向试验,以证实或反驳这些结果。