Suppr超能文献

地舒单抗和阿仑膦酸钠对胫骨远端和桡骨小梁板和小梁杆微观结构的影响:一项事后 HR-pQCT 研究。

The effect of denosumab and alendronate on trabecular plate and rod microstructure at the distal tibia and radius: A post-hoc HR-pQCT study.

机构信息

Bone Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

出版信息

Bone. 2022 Jan;154:116187. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116187. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Age-related trabecular microstructural deterioration and conversion from plate-like trabeculae to rod-like trabeculae occur because of unbalanced rapid remodeling. As denosumab achieves greater remodeling suppression and lower cortical porosity than alendronate, we hypothesized that denosumab might also preserve trabecular plate microstructure, bone stiffness and strength more effectively than alendronate.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of a phase 2 study, postmenopausal women randomized to placebo (P, n = 74), denosumab (D, n = 72), or alendronate (A, n = 68). HR-pQCT scans of the distal radius and tibia were performed at baseline and Month-12 (M12). Trabecular compartment was subjected to Individual Trabecula Segmentation while finite element analysis was performed to estimate stiffness and strength. Percent change from baseline at M12 of each parameter was compared between patient groups.

RESULTS

At the distal tibia, in the placebo group, plate surface area (pTb.S, -1.3%) decreased while rod bone volume fraction (rBV/TV, +4.5%) and number (rTb.N, +2.1%) increased. These changes were prevented by denosumab but persisted despite alendronate therapy (pTb.S: -1.7%; rBV/TV: +6.9%; rTb.N: +3.0%). Both treatments improved whole bone stiffness (D: +3.1%; A: +1.8%) and failure load (D: +3.0%; A: +2.2%); improvements using denosumab was significant compared to placebo (stiffness: p = 0.004; failure load: p = 0.003). At the distal radius, denosumab increased total trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV, +3.4%) and whole bone failure load (+4.0%), significantly different from placebo (BV/TV: p = 0.044; failure load: p = 0.046). Significantly different effects of either drug on plate and rod microstructure were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab preserved trabecular plate microstructure. Alendronate did not. However, estimated strength did not differ between denosumab and alendronate treated groups.

摘要

背景

与增龄相关的小梁微观结构恶化以及板状小梁向杆状小梁的转化是由于不平衡的快速重塑所致。由于 denosumab 的重塑抑制作用大于 alendronate,皮质骨孔隙率更低,我们假设 denosumab 可能比 alendronate 更有效地保留小梁板状结构、骨刚度和强度。

方法

这是一项 2 期研究的事后分析,纳入了随机分配至安慰剂(P,n=74)、denosumab(D,n=72)或 alendronate(A,n=68)的绝经后妇女。基线和第 12 个月(M12)时对桡骨远端和胫骨进行高分辨率外周定量 CT(HR-pQCT)扫描。对小梁骨进行个体小梁分割,同时进行有限元分析以估计刚度和强度。比较各组患者的各参数在 M12 时与基线相比的变化百分比。

结果

在胫骨远端,安慰剂组的板状表面积(pTb.S,-1.3%)减少,而杆状骨体积分数(rBV/TV,+4.5%)和数量(rTb.N,+2.1%)增加。denosumab 可预防这些变化,但 alendronate 治疗仍持续存在(pTb.S:-1.7%;rBV/TV:+6.9%;rTb.N:+3.0%)。两种治疗方法均改善了整体骨刚度(D:+3.1%;A:+1.8%)和断裂负荷(D:+3.0%;A:+2.2%);与安慰剂相比,denosumab 的改善更为显著(刚度:p=0.004;断裂负荷:p=0.003)。在桡骨远端,denosumab 增加了总小梁骨体积分数(BV/TV,+3.4%)和整体骨断裂负荷(+4.0%),与安慰剂相比差异有统计学意义(BV/TV:p=0.044;断裂负荷:p=0.046)。未检测到两种药物对板状和杆状微观结构有显著不同的影响。

结论

denosumab 保留了小梁板状结构。alendronate 则没有。然而,denosumab 和 alendronate 治疗组的估计强度没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验