MacCord Kate, Maienschein Jane
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Aug 31;9:734315. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.734315. eCollection 2021.
Regeneration has been investigated since Aristotle, giving rise to many ways of explaining what this process is and how it works. Current research focuses on gene expression and cell signaling of regeneration within individual model organisms. We tend to look to model organisms on the reasoning that because of evolution, information gained from other species must in some respect be generalizable. However, for all that we have uncovered about how regeneration works within individual organisms, we have yet to translate what we have gleaned into achieving the goal of regenerative medicine: to harness and enhance our own regenerative abilities. Turning to history may provide a crucial perspective in advancing us toward this goal. History gives perspective, allowing us to reflect on how our predecessors did their work and what assumptions they made, thus also revealing limitations. History, then, may show us how we can move from our current reductionist thinking focused on particular selected model organisms toward generalizations about this crucial process that operates across complex living systems and move closer to repairing our own damaged bodies.
自亚里士多德时代起,人们就开始研究再生现象,由此产生了许多关于这个过程是什么以及如何运作的解释方式。当前的研究集中在单个模式生物体内再生的基因表达和细胞信号传导方面。我们倾向于借助模式生物进行研究,其依据是,由于进化的缘故,从其他物种获得的信息在某些方面必定具有普遍适用性。然而,尽管我们已经揭示了再生在单个生物体中的运作方式,但我们尚未将所收集到的知识转化为实现再生医学的目标:即利用并增强我们自身的再生能力。回顾历史或许能为我们朝着这个目标前进提供至关重要的视角。历史能给予我们洞察力,让我们反思前人是如何开展研究工作的以及他们做出了哪些假设,进而也能揭示其中的局限性。那么,历史可能会向我们展示如何从当前专注于特定选定模式生物的还原论思维,转向对这个跨越复杂生命系统运作的关键过程进行归纳总结,并更接近修复我们自身受损身体的目标。