Xu Yalan, Qiao Jie
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(15):1235. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3037.
There are two common treatments for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro maturation (IVM). Our study aimed to assess the clinical effects and safety of IVM versus IVF for PCOS.
We searched randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies comparing IVM versus IVF for PCOS. Data were extracted from eligible studies. We sought to evaluate fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Eight studies with a total of 1,579 patients were included in the present study. According to the heterogeneity analysis, there were no differences between the IVM group and IVF group in terms of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage. Additionally, the IVF group had a higher live birth rate than the IVM group (overall P=0.0007). Sensitivity analysis and funnel plot showed that our study was robust and based on the funnel plot this article had low publication bias.
The findings of the present study indicated that IVM had similar clinical effects compared with IVF in patients with PCOS. However, IVM might be a suitable option for PCOS in terms of cost and successful pregnancy rate.
多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)有两种常见治疗方法:体外受精(IVF)和体外成熟(IVM)。我们的研究旨在评估IVM与IVF治疗PCOS的临床效果和安全性。
我们检索了比较IVM与IVF治疗PCOS的随机对照试验和回顾性队列研究。从符合条件的研究中提取数据。我们试图评估受精率、临床妊娠率、活产率和流产情况。结果以风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
本研究纳入了八项研究,共1579例患者。根据异质性分析,IVM组和IVF组在受精率、临床妊娠率和流产方面无差异。此外,IVF组的活产率高于IVM组(总体P = 0.0007)。敏感性分析和漏斗图显示我们的研究结果可靠,基于漏斗图,本文存在低发表偏倚。
本研究结果表明,IVM与IVF治疗PCOS患者的临床效果相似。然而,就成本和成功妊娠率而言,IVM可能是PCOS的一个合适选择。