PRECISIONheor, 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Ste 500, Los Angeles, CA 90034. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Sep 1;27(9):e308-e315. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88743.
Patients with chronic respiratory failure resulting from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-CRF) have limited treatment options and poor health outcomes. We examined the effect of noninvasive ventilation at home (NIVH) treatment on all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits.
Retrospective cohort study.
Using Medicare claims data between 2012 and 2017, we divided patients with COPD-CRF into a treatment group, defined by NIVH receipt within 2 months of CRF diagnosis, and a control group without NIVH receipt in the entire follow-up period. We modeled time to death, first hospitalization, and first ED visit. Cox regressions were performed, mitigating selection bias using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights with regression controls. Sensitivity analyses with time-varying exposure to NIVH were conducted on the full sample irrespective of treatment timing.
We identified 410 patients treated with NIVH and 36,247 controls. We observed a reduced risk of hospitalizations (HR, 0.790; 95% CI, 0.592-0.988), ED visits (HR, 0.571; 95% CI, 0.457-0.686), and mortality (HR, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.462-0.772). The benefit of NIVH diminished over time for mortality and ED visits but remained constant for hospitalizations. However, no survival benefit was observed in the sensitivity analyses that accounted for immortal-time bias; further exploration suggests that earlier NIVH treatment following CRF diagnosis may be an important factor in improving survival outcomes.
Patients with COPD-CRF who received NIVH had statistically significant reductions in hospitalizations and ED visits compared with patients not treated with NIVH. Further research is needed to examine the effect of NIVH on mortality.
由慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD-CRF)引起的慢性呼吸衰竭患者的治疗选择有限,健康状况较差。我们研究了家庭无创通气(NIVH)治疗对全因死亡率、住院率和急诊部(ED)就诊率的影响。
回顾性队列研究。
使用 2012 年至 2017 年期间的 Medicare 理赔数据,我们将 COPD-CRF 患者分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组是指在 CRF 诊断后 2 个月内接受 NIVH 治疗的患者,对照组是指在整个随访期间未接受 NIVH 治疗的患者。我们建立了死亡、首次住院和首次 ED 就诊的时间模型。采用 Cox 回归模型,通过回归控制来稳定治疗倾向性评分逆概率加权法来减轻选择偏倚。在不论治疗时机的全样本中进行了时变 NIVH 暴露的敏感性分析。
我们确定了 410 名接受 NIVH 治疗的患者和 36247 名对照患者。我们观察到住院率(HR,0.790;95%CI,0.592-0.988)、ED 就诊率(HR,0.571;95%CI,0.457-0.686)和死亡率(HR,0.617;95%CI,0.462-0.772)的风险降低。随着时间的推移,NIVH 在死亡率和 ED 就诊方面的获益减少,但在住院率方面保持不变。然而,在考虑了无寿命偏倚的敏感性分析中,没有观察到生存获益;进一步的探索表明,CRF 诊断后尽早接受 NIVH 治疗可能是改善生存结果的一个重要因素。
与未接受 NIVH 治疗的患者相比,接受 NIVH 治疗的 COPD-CRF 患者的住院率和 ED 就诊率显著降低。需要进一步研究 NIVH 对死亡率的影响。