Blackbird Initiative, Órama Institute, Flinders University, Australia.
Blackbird Initiative, Órama Institute, Flinders University, Australia.
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Nov;146:103962. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103962. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders (CBT-ED) outperforms other treatments for non-underweight eating disorders in adults, but we have limited ability to match CBT-ED to individual profiles. We examined if we could identify who benefits most from two forms of 10-session CBT-ED; one emphasizing early behaviour change with substantial content on improving body image (CBT-T), and the other including motivational work and no content on body image using chapters from self-help books (CBTm). Participants were 98 consecutive referrals to the Flinders University Services for Eating Disorders. Fourteen clinical psychology postgraduates delivered the treatment under expert supervision. Outcome measures were completed on five occasions: baseline, 4-, 10-, 14- and 22-weeks post-randomisation. Our primary outcome was global eating psychopathology. Moderators included motivation (readiness and confidence to change) and body avoidance and body checking. Intent-to-treat analyses showed no difference between the groups with a significant main effect of time associated with large effect size improvements, commensurate with longer forms of CBT-ED. Participants with lower readiness to change in CBTm had significantly greater decreases in disordered eating over follow-up compared to those with low motivation in CBT-T. People with lower readiness to change might benefit from the incorporation of motivational work in CBT-ED.
认知行为疗法治疗进食障碍(CBT-ED)在成年人中非体重相关进食障碍的治疗效果优于其他治疗方法,但我们将 CBT-ED 与个体特征相匹配的能力有限。我们研究了是否可以确定两种形式的 10 节 CBT-ED 中谁受益最大;一种强调早期行为改变,大量内容集中在改善身体形象上(CBT-T),另一种包括动机工作,不包含身体形象章节,使用自助书籍的章节(CBTm)。参与者为弗林德斯大学服务进食障碍的连续 98 例转诊患者。14 名临床心理学研究生在专家监督下提供治疗。在五次不同时间点完成结果测量:基线、4 周、10 周、14 周和随机分组后 22 周。我们的主要结果是整体进食心理病理学。调节因素包括动机(改变的准备和信心)以及身体回避和身体检查。意向性治疗分析显示,两组之间没有差异,时间的主要影响与较大的效应量改善相关,与较长形式的 CBT-ED 相当。在 CBTm 中改变意愿较低的参与者在随访期间的饮食失调症状显著下降,而在 CBT-T 中动机较低的参与者则没有显著下降。改变意愿较低的人可能会从 CBT-ED 中加入动机工作中受益。