Goiffon Reece J, Best Till D, Wrobel Maria M, McDermott Shaunagh, Sharma Amita, Chang Connie Y, Yang Kai, Fintelmann Florian J
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Nov 1;36(6):389-396. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000609.
To investigate the effect on procedure time and patient radiation indices of replacing helical acquisitions for needle guidance during thoracic needle biopsy (TNB) with intermittent single-rotation axial acquisitions.
This retrospective intervention study included 215 consecutive TNBs performed by a single operator from 2014 to 2018. Characteristics of patients, lesions, and procedures were compared between TNBs guided only by helical acquisitions initiated in the control room (helical group, n=141) and TNBs guided in part by intermittent single-rotation axial computed tomography controlled by foot pedal (single-rotation group, n=74). Procedure time and patient radiation indices were primary outcomes, complications, and radiologist radiation dose were secondary outcomes.
Patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics did not differ between helical and single-rotation groups. Use of single-rotation axial acquisitions decreased procedure time by 10.5 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.2-12.8 min) or 27% (95% CI: 22%-32%; P<0.001). Patient dose in cumulative volume computed tomography dose index decreased by 23% (95% CI: 12%-33%) or 8 mGy (95% CI: 4.3-31.6 mGy; P=0.01). Dose-length product decreased by 50% (95% CI: 40%-60%) or 270 mGy cm (95% CI: 195-345 mGy cm; P<0.001). No operator radiation exposure was detected. Rate of diagnostic result, pneumothorax, hemoptysis, and hemorrhage did not differ between groups.
Replacing helical acquisitions with intermittent single-rotation axial acquisitions significantly decreases TNB procedure time and patient radiation indices without adversely affecting diagnostic rate, procedural complications, or operator radiation dose.
研究在胸部穿刺活检(TNB)过程中,用间歇性单旋转轴向采集取代螺旋采集用于针引导对操作时间和患者辐射指标的影响。
这项回顾性干预研究纳入了2014年至2018年由一名操作者连续进行的215例TNB。比较了仅在控制室通过螺旋采集引导的TNB(螺旋组,n = 141)和部分由脚踏板控制的间歇性单旋转轴向计算机断层扫描引导的TNB(单旋转组,n = 74)之间的患者、病变和操作特征。操作时间和患者辐射指标为主要结局,并发症和放射科医生辐射剂量为次要结局。
螺旋组和单旋转组之间的患者、病变和操作特征无差异。使用单旋转轴向采集使操作时间减少了10.5分钟(95%置信区间[CI]:8.2 - 12.8分钟)或27%(95% CI:22% - 32%;P < 0.001)。累积容积计算机断层扫描剂量指数中的患者剂量降低了23%(95% CI:12% - 33%)或8 mGy(95% CI:4.3 - 31.6 mGy;P = 0.01)。剂量长度乘积降低了50%(95% CI:40% - 60%)或270 mGy·cm(95% CI:195 - 345 mGy·cm;P < 0.001)。未检测到操作者辐射暴露。两组之间的诊断结果率、气胸、咯血和出血发生率无差异。
用间歇性单旋转轴向采集取代螺旋采集可显著减少TNB操作时间和患者辐射指标,且不会对诊断率、操作并发症或操作者辐射剂量产生不利影响。