Suppr超能文献

直接 LC-MS/MS 和间接 GC-MS/MS 方法均可用于测量尿中双酚 A 浓度,且两种方法具有可比性。

Direct LC-MS/MS and indirect GC-MS/MS methods for measuring urinary bisphenol A concentrations are comparable.

机构信息

Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Branch, Health Canada, Canada.

Centre de Toxicologie du Québec (CTQ), Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106874. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106874. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bisphenol A (BPA) is typically measured in urine using an indirect method that involves enzymatic deconjugation and extraction. In contrast, the direct method measures free and conjugated BPA concurrently and sums them to estimate urinary BPA concentrations. Statistical comparison of total BPA results using the direct and indirect methods is necessary to accurately interpret biomonitoring data for risk assessments.

OBJECTIVES

To compare urinary BPA concentrations estimated from the indirect and direct methods in duplicate first trimester urine samples collected from 1879 pregnant women from the MIREC Study.

METHODS

For the indirect method, we measured urinary BPA concentrations using GC-MS/MS. For the direct method, we summed free and conjugated BPA concentrations measured using LC-MS/MS. We evaluated deviation between the two methods using the Bland-Altman analysis in the total sample and stratified (1) by specific gravity and (2) at the limit of quantification (LOQ).

RESULTS

Median urinary BPA concentrations for the direct and indirect methods were 0.89 µg BPA equivalents/L and 0.81 µg/L respectively. Concentrations from the direct method were, on average, 8.6% (95% CI: 6.7%, 10.5%) higher than the indirect method in a Bland-Altman analysis. The percent differences between the two methods was 4.0% in urines with specific gravities < 1.02 (n = 1348, 72%) and 20.3% in urine with specific gravity ≥ 1.02. In values below the LOQ (n = 663, 35%), we observed smaller average percent deviation (4.8%) between the two methods but wider limits of agreement.

DISCUSSION

Results from this study, based on the largest statistically rigorous comparison of the direct and indirect methods of BPA measurement, contrast previous findings reporting that the indirect method underestimates total BPA exposure. The difference in urinary BPA concentrations we observed with the indirect and direct methods is unlikely to alter the interpretation of health outcome data.

摘要

背景

双酚 A(BPA)通常通过间接方法在尿液中进行测量,该方法涉及酶去共轭化和提取。相比之下,直接方法同时测量游离和共轭 BPA,并将其相加以估计尿液中 BPA 的浓度。为了准确解释风险评估的生物监测数据,需要对使用直接和间接方法测量的总 BPA 结果进行统计学比较。

目的

比较 1879 名来自 MIREC 研究的孕妇的第一孕期尿液重复样本中,使用间接和直接方法测量的尿液 BPA 浓度。

方法

对于间接方法,我们使用 GC-MS/MS 测量尿液中的 BPA 浓度。对于直接方法,我们将使用 LC-MS/MS 测量的游离和共轭 BPA 浓度相加。我们在总样本中使用 Bland-Altman 分析,(1)按比重分层和(2)在定量下限(LOQ)处,评估两种方法之间的偏差。

结果

直接和间接方法的尿液 BPA 浓度中位数分别为 0.89 µg BPA 当量/L 和 0.81 µg/L。在 Bland-Altman 分析中,直接方法的浓度平均比间接方法高 8.6%(95%CI:6.7%,10.5%)。两种方法之间的差异百分比在比重 < 1.02 的尿液中为 4.0%(n=1348,72%),在比重 ≥ 1.02 的尿液中为 20.3%。在低于 LOQ 的值(n=663,35%)中,我们观察到两种方法之间的平均偏差百分比较小(4.8%),但协议范围较宽。

讨论

这项基于对 BPA 测量的直接和间接方法进行的最大统计学严格比较的研究结果,与之前报告的间接方法低估总 BPA 暴露的结果形成对比。我们观察到间接和直接方法测量的尿液 BPA 浓度之间的差异不太可能改变对健康结果数据的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4084/8801255/3d330bb4df10/nihms-1742237-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验