Foster Wendy, McKellar Lois, Fleet Julie, Sweet Linda
University of South Australia, Australia; Flinders University, Australia.
University of South Australia, Australia.
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):364-383. doi: 10.1177/09697330211023983. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
Research suggests that the incidence of moral distress experienced by health professionals is significant and increasing, yet the concept lacks clarity and remains largely misunderstood. Currently, there is limited understanding of moral distress in the context of midwifery practice. The term moral distress was first used to label the psychological distress experienced following complex ethical decision-making and moral constraint in nursing. The term is now used across multiple health professions including midwifery, nursing, pharmacy and medicine, yet is used cautiously due to confusion regarding its theoretical and contextual basis. The aim of this study is to understand the concept of moral distress in the context of midwifery practice, describing the attributes, antecedents and consequences. This concept analysis uses Rodgers' evolutionary framework and is the first stage of a sequential mixed-methods study. A literature search was conducted using multiple databases resulting in eight articles for review. Data were analysed using NVivo12©. Three core attributes were identified: moral actions and inactions, conflicting needs and negative feelings/emotions. The antecedents of clinical situations, moral awareness, uncertainty and constraint were identified. Consequences of moral distress include adverse personal professional and organisational outcomes. A model case depicting these aspects is presented. A midwifery focused definition of moral distress is offered as 'a psychological suffering following clinical situations of moral uncertainty and/or constraint, which result in an experience of personal powerlessness where the midwife perceives an inability to preserve all competing moral commitments'. This concept analysis affirms the presence of moral distress in midwifery practice and provides evidence to move towards a consistent definition of moral distress.
研究表明,卫生专业人员经历道德困扰的发生率很高且呈上升趋势,但这一概念缺乏清晰度,仍在很大程度上被误解。目前,对于助产实践背景下的道德困扰了解有限。“道德困扰”一词最初用于描述护理中复杂伦理决策和道德约束后所经历的心理困扰。现在,该术语在包括助产、护理、药学和医学在内的多个卫生专业中使用,但由于对其理论和背景基础存在混淆,使用时较为谨慎。本研究的目的是了解助产实践背景下的道德困扰概念,描述其属性、前因和后果。这种概念分析采用了罗杰斯的进化框架,是一项序贯混合方法研究的第一阶段。使用多个数据库进行文献检索,得到八篇文章以供综述。使用NVivo12©对数据进行分析。确定了三个核心属性:道德行为与不作为、相互冲突的需求以及负面情绪。确定了临床情况、道德意识、不确定性和约束等前因。道德困扰的后果包括对个人、专业和组织的不良影响。给出了一个描述这些方面的典型案例。提出了一个以助产为重点的道德困扰定义,即“在道德不确定性和/或约束的临床情况下产生的心理痛苦,这种情况导致助产士感到个人无力,认为无法维护所有相互竞争的道德承诺”。这种概念分析证实了助产实践中存在道德困扰,并为朝着道德困扰的一致定义迈进提供了证据。