Suppr超能文献

全血来源的随机供体血小板(RDP)在隔夜保存后与 2 小时保存后制备的 RDP 的体外和体内参数比较:来自印度的单中心报告。

Comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo parameters of whole blood derived random donor platelets (RDP) after over-night hold with RDP prepared after 2-h hold: Single centre report from India.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Sector-38, Gurgaon, 122001, India.

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Sector-38, Gurgaon, 122001, India.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2021 Dec;60(6):103261. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103261. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Random Donor Platelet (RDP) derived from whole blood is the major source of platelets in India. At our centre, we prepare RDPs by buffy coat method after a holding period of 2-hours (THRDP) as per current regulatory guidelines. Overnight hold of buffy coats before RDP preparation (OHRDP) would logistically optimise the manpower usage at our centre. The aim of this study was to compare both in-vitro as well as in-vivo parameters of OHRDPs with THRDPs.

METHODOLOGY

Hematological (Platelet, leucocyte counts), physical (pH and Swirling) and biochemical parameters (pO2, pCO2, lactate, bicarbonate and glucose) as well as platelet activation markers were tested in THRDPs and OHRDPs each at Day-1 and Day-5 as in-vitro studies. Separately, in-vivo study was done where Corrected count increment (CCI) and percentage platelet recovery (PPR) were considered. All parameters were expressed as Mean ± Standard deviation and were analysed using paired t-test with level of significance, p < 0.05.

RESULTS

OHRDPs had higher platelet counts and lower leucocytes and CD62 P expression than THRDPs. All other markers were well within the quality control range in both groups. No significant differences were seen in the two groups when comparing CCI and PPR.

CONCLUSION

OHRDPs were found to be as good or better as compared to the THRDPs in the in-vitro part of our study. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups when they were compared in vivo. This makes us conclude that overnight hold of buffy coats may be implemented at our center.

摘要

背景

全血来源的随机供体血小板(RDP)是印度血小板的主要来源。在我们中心,我们按照现行监管指南,在 2 小时的保存期后(THRDP)通过浓缩白细胞层法制备 RDP。在准备 RDP 之前对浓缩白细胞层进行隔夜保存(OHRDP)将在我们中心的人力使用方面实现物流优化。本研究的目的是比较 OHRDP 和 THRDP 的体外和体内参数。

方法

在第 1 天和第 5 天,对 THRDP 和 OHRDP 进行体外研究,分别检测血液学(血小板、白细胞计数)、物理(pH 值和旋转)和生化参数(pO2、pCO2、乳酸、碳酸氢盐和葡萄糖)以及血小板活化标志物。此外,还进行了体内研究,其中考虑了校正计数增量(CCI)和血小板回收率(PPR)。所有参数均以均值±标准差表示,并使用具有统计学意义的配对 t 检验进行分析,p 值<0.05。

结果

OHRDP 的血小板计数较高,白细胞计数和 CD62 P 表达较低。两组的所有其他标志物均在质量控制范围内。在比较 CCI 和 PPR 时,两组之间未见显著差异。

结论

在我们研究的体外部分,OHRDP 被发现与 THRDP 一样好或更好。此外,两组在体内比较时也没有显著差异。这使我们得出结论,在我们中心可以实施浓缩白细胞层的隔夜保存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验