Notermans Bo J W, Lans Jonathan, Ponton Ryan P, Jupiter Jesse B, Chen Neal C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
J Hand Microsurg. 2021 Jul;13(3):132-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709088. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
The rate of reoperation after pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty ranges from 5.9 to 37% and complications such as radiographic loosening, deformity, dislocation, and stiffness are common. Because of the limited amount of knowledge around these problems, we evaluated factors associated with reoperation after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty. We retrospectively included all adult patients that underwent primary PIP pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system. A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation: 14), underwent 66 PIP arthroplasties. To address for within individual correlations, we only included fingers treated at patients' initial surgery ( = 54) in our statistical analysis. These patients were predominantly diagnosed with noninflammatory arthritis 73% ( = 33). Arthroplasty was performed upon 10 index, 22 middle, 20 ring, and 2 small fingers. The reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30% over a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8.7-54). Indications for reoperation consisted of subluxation ( = 6), stiffness ( = 5), swan-neck deformity ( = 3), and soft tissue complications ( = 2). Younger age ( = 0.025), male sex ( = 0.017), and noninflammatory arthritis ( = 0.038) were associated with a higher reoperation rate. In this study, our reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30%. This study suggested that younger patients, males, and patients with noninflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of reoperation. We recommend considering these factors when selecting candidates for pyrocarbon arthroplasty. Future studies should focus on prospectively researching these factors in comparison with other implants.
热解碳近端指间(PIP)关节置换术后的再次手术率在5.9%至37%之间,放射学松动、畸形、脱位和僵硬等并发症很常见。由于关于这些问题的知识有限,我们评估了热解碳PIP关节置换术后再次手术的相关因素。
我们回顾性纳入了2002年至2016年在一个机构系统中接受初次PIP热解碳植入关节置换术的所有成年患者。共有45例患者,平均年龄55岁(标准差:14),接受了66例PIP关节置换术。为了处理个体内部的相关性,我们在统计分析中仅纳入了患者初次手术时治疗的手指(n = 54)。这些患者主要诊断为非炎性关节炎,占73%(n = 33)。关节置换术分别在10根示指、22根中指、20根环指和2根小指上进行。
热解碳PIP关节置换术后的再次手术率在中位随访25个月时为30%(四分位间距:8.7 - 54)。再次手术的指征包括半脱位(n = 6)、僵硬(n = 5)、鹅颈畸形(n = 3)和软组织并发症(n = 2)。年龄较小(P = 0.025)、男性(P = 0.017)和非炎性关节炎(P = 0.038)与较高的再次手术率相关。
在本研究中,我们的热解碳PIP关节置换术后再次手术率为30%。本研究表明,年轻患者、男性和非炎性关节炎患者再次手术的风险较高。我们建议在选择热解碳关节置换术的候选人时考虑这些因素。未来的研究应集中于与其他植入物相比,对这些因素进行前瞻性研究。