• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剪切波弹性成像与血清学检查结果在评估慢性肝病纤维化中的比较。

Comparison between shear wave elastography and serological findings for the evaluation of fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

作者信息

Liaqat Mahjabeen, Siddique Kashif, Yousaf Imran, Bacha Raham, Farooq S Muhammad Yousaf, Gilani Syed Amir

机构信息

Radiology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Hospital, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Ultrason. 2021 Aug 16;21(86):e186-e193. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0030. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.15557/JoU.2021.0030
PMID:34540271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8438924/
Abstract

In this study, we sought to examine the optimal cutoff values for predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, and to determine the level of agreement between shear wave elastography and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) scores in patients with chronic liver disease. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed at the Radiology Department of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital Lahore from 1 Jun 2019 until 1 June 2020. FIB-4 and APRI scores were determined by the following formula: FIB-4 = (age × AST) ÷ (platelet count × (√ (ALT)) and APRI = (AST÷AST upper limit of normal) ÷ platelet × 100. Data was analyzed with the help of SPSS version 24.0 and Microsoft Excel 2013. Eighty individuals were conveniently selected, of which 62.5% were men and 37.5% were women. The mean age of the subjects was 43.47 SD ± 13.85 years. APRI and FIB-4 scores predicted F4 patients using the cutoff values of 0.47 (Sn. 72%, Sp. 70%) and 1.27 (Sn. 78%, Sp. 73%), respectively. The cutoff values of 0.46 for APRI and 1.27 for FIB-4 predicted F3-F4 patients (Sn. 74% and 77%; Sp. 76% and 76%), respectively. To predict F1-F4 compared to F0, the cutoff value was 0.34 (Sn. 68%, Sp. 75%) for APRI, while the cutoff value for FIB was 0.87 (Sn. 72%, Sp. 75%). The findings suggest that FIB-4 shows better diagnostic accuracy than APRI. This study provides optimal cutoff values for different groups of fibrosis patients for both serum markers. Also, the diagnostic accuracy of FIB-4 for predicting liver fibrosis was found to be superior to APRI in all disease stages.

摘要

在本研究中,我们试图确定预测不同阶段肝纤维化的最佳临界值,并确定慢性肝病患者中剪切波弹性成像与天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)和纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)评分之间的一致性水平。2019年6月1日至2020年6月1日在拉合尔绍卡特·汗姆纪念医院放射科进行了一项描述性横断面研究。FIB-4和APRI评分通过以下公式确定:FIB-4 =(年龄×AST)÷(血小板计数×(√ALT)),APRI =(AST÷AST正常上限)÷血小板×100。借助SPSS 24.0版和Microsoft Excel 2013对数据进行分析。方便选取了80名个体,其中62.5%为男性,37.5%为女性。受试者的平均年龄为43.47±13.85岁(标准差)。APRI和FIB-4评分分别使用临界值0.47(灵敏度72%,特异度70%)和1.27(灵敏度78%,特异度73%)预测F4期患者。APRI临界值0.46和FIB-4临界值1.27分别预测F3-F4期患者(灵敏度分别为74%和77%;特异度分别为76%和76%)。与F0期相比,预测F1-F4期时,APRI的临界值为0.34(灵敏度68%,特异度75%),而FIB的临界值为0.87(灵敏度72%,特异度75%)。研究结果表明,FIB-4的诊断准确性优于APRI。本研究为两类血清标志物的不同纤维化患者群体提供了最佳临界值。此外,发现在所有疾病阶段,FIB-4预测肝纤维化的诊断准确性均优于APRI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/07cd525d6012/jou-21-86-e186-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/5d88366eb88b/jou-21-86-e186-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/70b661c3c526/jou-21-86-e186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/2189733081a2/jou-21-86-e186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/b254c74519a1/jou-21-86-e186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/b8d6c90e71db/jou-21-86-e186-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/c184139de3b0/jou-21-86-e186-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/07cd525d6012/jou-21-86-e186-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/5d88366eb88b/jou-21-86-e186-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/70b661c3c526/jou-21-86-e186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/2189733081a2/jou-21-86-e186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/b254c74519a1/jou-21-86-e186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/b8d6c90e71db/jou-21-86-e186-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/c184139de3b0/jou-21-86-e186-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81af/8438924/07cd525d6012/jou-21-86-e186-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison between shear wave elastography and serological findings for the evaluation of fibrosis in chronic liver disease.剪切波弹性成像与血清学检查结果在评估慢性肝病纤维化中的比较。
J Ultrason. 2021 Aug 16;21(86):e186-e193. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0030. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Value of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-to-platelet ratio in diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶/血小板比值在诊断慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化中的价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 7;23(41):7425-7432. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7425.
3
Liver fibrosis staging with combination of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems in chronic hepatitis C as an alternative to transient elastography.丙型肝炎慢性期采用APRI和FIB-4评分系统联合进行肝纤维化分期作为瞬时弹性成像的替代方法。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):498-503. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0406. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Serum Fibrosis Marker Panels FIB-4 Index and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) Are Equivalent to AST Alone at Predicting Liver Fibrosis in a Cohort of 1731 Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus.血清纤维化标志物组合FIB-4指数和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)与血小板比值指数(APRI)在预测1731例丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的肝纤维化方面与单独使用AST等效。
J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Jul 1;2(1):76-85. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2016.022509.
5
FIB-4 and APRI scores for predicting severe liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis HCV patients: a monocentric retrospective study.FIB-4和APRI评分预测慢性丙型肝炎患者严重肝纤维化:一项单中心回顾性研究
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Mar;7(1):111-116. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.104543. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
The Roles of Fibrosis Index Based on Four Factors and Aspartate Transaminase-to-Platelet Ratio Index Scoring Systems as an Alternative to Transient Elastography Liver Stiffness in Liver Fibrosis Staging in Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Co-Infected Patients.基于四个因素的纤维化指数和天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数评分系统在人类免疫缺陷病毒和丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者肝纤维化分期中作为瞬时弹性成像肝脏硬度替代指标的作用。
Gastroenterology Res. 2021 Aug;14(4):209-213. doi: 10.14740/gr1377. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Fibroscan Compared to FIB-4, APRI, and AST/ALT Ratio for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Saudi Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.在沙特非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者中,Fibroscan与FIB-4、APRI及AST/ALT比值在评估肝纤维化方面的比较
Hepat Mon. 2016 Jul 3;16(7):e38346. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.38346. eCollection 2016 Jul.
8
Stepwise application of fibrosis index based on four factors, red cell distribution width-platelet ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio for compensated hepatitis B fibrosis detection.逐步应用基于四个因素、红细胞分布宽度-血小板比值和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶-血小板比值的纤维化指数检测代偿性乙型肝炎纤维化。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;33(1):256-263. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13811.
9
Significance of Correlation of Shear Wave Elastography With Fibrosis-4 in a Cohort of Patients With Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.剪切波弹性成像与纤维化-4在糖尿病和非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者队列中的相关性意义
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67015. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio and fibrosis-4 as biomarkers in biopsy-validated pediatric cystic fibrosis liver disease.天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值及纤维化-4 作为肝活检证实的儿童囊性纤维化肝病的生物标志物。
Hepatology. 2015 Nov;62(5):1576-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.28016. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of elevated liver enzyme level on 30-day mortality rates in patients undergoing nonemergency orthopedic surgery.肝酶水平升高对非急诊骨科手术患者30天死亡率的影响。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 May 6;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00395-7.

本文引用的文献

1
FIB-4 and APRI scores for predicting severe fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C - a developing country's perspective in DAA era.FIB-4和APRI评分预测慢性丙型肝炎严重纤维化——发展中国家在直接抗病毒药物时代的视角
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018 Mar 31;12(3):178-182. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10190.
2
Prospective comparison of transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, APRI and FIB-4 for staging liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis.慢性病毒性肝炎肝纤维化分期的瞬时弹性成像、单点剪切波弹性成像、APRI 和 FIB-4 的前瞻性比较。
J Viral Hepat. 2020 Apr;27(4):437-448. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13246. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Liver fibrosis staging with combination of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems in chronic hepatitis C as an alternative to transient elastography.
丙型肝炎慢性期采用APRI和FIB-4评分系统联合进行肝纤维化分期作为瞬时弹性成像的替代方法。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):498-503. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0406. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
APRI and FIB-4 in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients stratified by AST level.APRI 和 FIB-4 在按 AST 水平分层的慢性丙型肝炎患者肝纤维化评估中的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199760. eCollection 2018.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in different diseases.超声弹性成像在不同疾病中的诊断准确性。
J Ultrason. 2018 Mar;18(72):29-36. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2018.0005. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Screening for liver fibrosis in the general population: a call for action.在普通人群中筛查肝纤维化:行动呼吁。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):256-260. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30081-4. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.亚太肝脏研究协会(APASL)关于肝纤维化侵入性和非侵入性评估的共识指南:2016年更新版
Hepatol Int. 2017 Jan;11(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Liver Fibrosis: From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapies.肝纤维化:从发病机制到新型疗法
Dig Dis. 2016;34(4):410-22. doi: 10.1159/000444556. Epub 2016 May 11.
9
Systematic review with meta-analysis: direct comparisons of biomarkers for the diagnosis of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C and B.系统评价与荟萃分析:慢性丙型和乙型肝炎纤维化诊断生物标志物的直接比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jan;43(1):16-29. doi: 10.1111/apt.13446. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis.磁共振弹性成像用于非酒精性脂肪性肝病肝纤维化分期:诊断准确性的系统评价和个体参与者数据汇总分析
Eur Radiol. 2016 May;26(5):1431-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3949-z. Epub 2015 Aug 28.