• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与多瓣膜手术对主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者院内结局的影响及趋势

Trend and Impact of Concomitant CABG and Multiple-Valve Procedure on In-hospital Outcomes of SAVR Patients.

作者信息

Wu Jing, Cong Xiaoqiang, Lou Zhiyang, Zhang Mingyou

机构信息

Institute of Translational Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 3;8:740084. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.740084. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.740084
PMID:34540926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8446624/
Abstract

The trends of concomitant CABG and multiple-valve procedures and their impact on in-hospital outcomes in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement are unexplored. This was a retrospective cohort study using the administrative database of the U.S. national inpatient sample from 2012 to 2018 to identify patients who underwent SAVR with or without concomitant CABG and/or multiple-valve procedures. During the study period, a total of 75,763 representing 378,815 patients underwent SAVR nationwide were identified, of whom 42,993 (55.1%) experienced isolated SAVR, 27,133 (34.8%) underwent concomitant CABG, 5,637 (7.2%) underwent multiple-valve procedures, and 2,298 (2.9%) underwent both concomitant CABG and multiple-valve procedures. The rate of multiple-valve procedures increased from 6.1% in 2012 to 9.2% in 2018 ( < 0.001 for trend). In-hospital mortality was 2.1, 3.9, 7.3, and 11.2% for isolated SAVR, SAVR with CABG, SAVR with multiple-valve procedures, and SAVR with CABG and multiple-valve procedures, respectively. After propensity matching, compared to isolated SAVR, the risk ratio for in-hospital mortality associated with concomitant CABG was 1.54 (CI 1.39-1.70). In multiple-valve procedures, it was 2.36 (CI 1.97-2.83), and in concomitant CABG and multiple-valve procedures, it was 2.92 (CI 2.29-3.73). The proportion of patients receiving multiple-valve procedures is increasing. While concomitant CABG moderately increased in-hospital mortality, multiple-valve procedures dramatically increased in-hospital mortality and complications, even after propensity score matching.

摘要

在经导管主动脉瓣置换术背景下,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与多瓣膜手术同时进行的趋势及其对住院结局的影响尚未得到研究。这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用2012年至2018年美国国家住院样本的行政数据库,以识别接受或未接受同期CABG和/或多瓣膜手术的外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者。在研究期间,全国共有75763例代表378815例患者接受了SAVR,其中42993例(55.1%)经历了单纯SAVR,27133例(34.8%)接受了同期CABG,5637例(7.2%)接受了多瓣膜手术,2298例(2.9%)同时接受了同期CABG和多瓣膜手术。多瓣膜手术的比例从2012年的6.1%上升至2018年的9.2%(趋势<0.001)。单纯SAVR、SAVR合并CABG、SAVR合并多瓣膜手术以及SAVR合并CABG和多瓣膜手术的住院死亡率分别为2.1%、3.9%、7.3%和11.2%。倾向评分匹配后,与单纯SAVR相比,同期CABG相关的住院死亡风险比为1.54(CI 1.39 - 1.70)。在多瓣膜手术中,风险比为2.36(CI 1.97 - 2.83),在同期CABG和多瓣膜手术中,风险比为2.92(CI 2.29 - 3.73)。接受多瓣膜手术的患者比例正在增加。虽然同期CABG适度增加了住院死亡率,但多瓣膜手术即使在倾向评分匹配后也显著增加了住院死亡率和并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/8446624/26ff70c001be/fcvm-08-740084-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/8446624/773440760def/fcvm-08-740084-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/8446624/26ff70c001be/fcvm-08-740084-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/8446624/773440760def/fcvm-08-740084-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/8446624/26ff70c001be/fcvm-08-740084-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Trend and Impact of Concomitant CABG and Multiple-Valve Procedure on In-hospital Outcomes of SAVR Patients.同期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与多瓣膜手术对主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者院内结局的影响及趋势
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 3;8:740084. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.740084. eCollection 2021.
2
Propensity matched comparison of in-hospital outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with previous history of CABG: Insights from the Nationwide inpatient sample.在曾行 CABG 手术的患者中,TAVR 与 SAVR 的院内结局的倾向评分匹配比较:来自全国住院患者样本的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1417-1426. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27708. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
3
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Patients Requiring a Permanent Pacemaker After Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.美国主动脉瓣置换术后需要永久性起搏器患者的危险因素及预后
J Card Surg. 2016 Aug;31(8):476-85. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12769. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.肝硬化患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的结局及再入院情况:一项倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):90-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27232. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
5
The Outcomes of Pulmonary Hypertension Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.肺动脉高压合并重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):586-593. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients at Intermediate Operative Risk With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.经冠状动脉旁路移植术史的中危手术风险患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局比较:SURTAVI 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):810-814. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1856.
7
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Having Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Versus Without Simultaneous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.比较行主动脉瓣置换术患者同期与非同期冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 15;125(6):964-969. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
9
Clinical End Points of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients <65 Years of Age (From the National Inpatient Sample Database).年龄<65岁患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的临床终点比较(来自国家住院患者样本数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.356. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis.经导管与外科主动脉瓣植入术治疗肝硬化患者主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1193-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.067. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Isolated and Combined Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Younger Than 65 Years.65岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者单纯及联合主动脉瓣置换的趋势
Struct Heart. 2025 Jun 24;9(8):100684. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100684. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The Impact of Body Mass Index on the Duration of Hospital Stay After Cardiac Surgery.体重指数对心脏手术后住院时间的影响。
Cureus. 2025 May 28;17(5):e84985. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84985. eCollection 2025 May.
3
The Culprit Valve: A New Concept for Reducing the Risk of Intervention in Patients with Severe Valve Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者经皮和外科主动脉瓣置换术的时间趋势及结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 7;7:603834. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.603834. eCollection 2020.
2
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Does additional coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement in elderly patients affect the early and long-term outcome?
致病瓣膜:降低重症瓣膜病患者干预风险的新概念。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Apr;122(4):e20240492. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240492.
4
National Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality from Mechanical Complications of Cardiac Valves and Grafts (1999-2020).1999 - 2020年心脏瓣膜和移植物机械并发症导致的死亡率的种族和民族差异的全国趋势
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 16;14(2):562. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020562.
5
Midterm Clinical Outcomes after Isolated Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis.低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者单纯外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的中期临床转归。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00123.
6
Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in the utilization and outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery.三尖瓣手术的使用情况及治疗结果中的种族、民族和性别差异。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jun 19;86(8):4368-4376. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002203. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Rates and Predictors of Structural Valve Degeneration and Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthetic Valve Over a 5-year Follow-up Period: A Single-center Experience.三连胜生物瓣膜在5年随访期内的结构瓣膜退变和失败的发生率及预测因素:一项单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2024 Jan-Mar;34(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_74_23. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Off-pump Coronary Surgery Combined With Aortic Valve Replacement Under Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Within an Unexpected Porcelain Aorta.在意外发现瓷化主动脉的情况下,在低温循环停搏下进行非体外循环冠状动脉手术联合主动脉瓣置换术。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 26;36(1):23-26. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1367. eCollection 2024.
9
Intraoperative Echocardiography: Guide to Decision-Making.术中超声心动图:决策指南。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Jun;26(6):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02054-1. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Relationship between Perme ICU Mobility Score and length of stay in patients after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后患者 ICU 移动能力评分与住院时间的关系。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2022 Jul 30;53(3):e2005179. doi: 10.25100/cm.v53i3.5179. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
老年患者在进行主动脉瓣置换术的同时加做冠状动脉旁路移植术会影响其早期和长期预后吗?
Heart Vessels. 2020 Apr;35(4):487-501. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01519-6. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Mechanical Complications in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者机械并发症的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1825-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.039.
5
Outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis, with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.主动脉瓣狭窄行主动脉瓣置换术的预后,无论是否同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;67(6):510-517. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1053-4. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
7
Outcome characteristics of multiple-valve surgery: comparison with single-valve procedures.多瓣膜手术的结果特征:与单瓣膜手术的比较。
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Jan-Feb;9(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000028.
8
Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America.北美瓣膜手术 15 年结果趋势。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;91(3):677-84; discussion p 684. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.009.
9
Short- and mid-term results for aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.八旬老人主动脉瓣置换术的短期和中期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):549-54. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.218040. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
10
Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.稳定型冠心病接受或不接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的优化药物治疗
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829. Epub 2007 Mar 26.