Choi Nam-Hong, Yang Bong-Seok, Kang Hang-Ki, Kim Kyu-Wan, Kim Han-Bit, Victoroff Brian N
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gwangmyeong Sungae Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):23259671211042334. doi: 10.1177/23259671211042334. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Biomechanical studies have demonstrated significant loosening of the adjustable-loop device as compared with the fixed-loop device used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Retensioning of the adjustable loop has been recommended; however, the timing of the retensioning is unknown.
Early (ER) and late retensioning (LR) will show similar gapping between the femoral tunnel and graft on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and similar clinical outcomes.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
This study included 101 patients who underwent hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the adjustable-loop device for femoral fixation between June 2016 and January 2018. All patients a had follow-up MRI on postoperative day 1. Patients with revision surgery and those with reinjury after reconstruction were excluded. In the ER group, retensioning and knot tying of the initially tightened adjustable loop were performed after the flip of the button and before the graft was fixed at the tibia. In the LR group, retensioning and knot tying were performed after initial tightening of the adjustable loop and graft fixation at the tibial side. The tunnel-graft gap measured on multiplanar reformatted images of MRI scans was compared between the groups, as were clinical outcomes.
The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 30.3 years (range, 14-61 years). ER and knot tying were performed in 56 patients and LR and knot tying in 45. Preoperative characteristics of the 2 groups showed no significant differences. The mean ± SD tunnel-graft gap was 1.5 ± 2.0 mm in the ER group and 5.4 ± 4.0 mm in the LR group ( < .001). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.
ER and knot tying demonstrated less tunnel-graft gap than that of LR. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes according to the timing of retensioning.
生物力学研究表明,与用于前交叉韧带重建的固定环装置相比,可调环装置有明显的松动。有人建议对可调环进行重新张紧;然而,重新张紧的时机尚不清楚。
早期重新张紧(ER)和晚期重新张紧(LR)在随访磁共振成像(MRI)上显示股骨隧道与移植物之间的间隙相似,临床结果也相似。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
本研究纳入了2016年6月至2018年1月期间使用可调环装置进行股骨固定的101例腘绳肌前交叉韧带重建患者。所有患者在术后第1天进行了随访MRI检查。排除翻修手术患者和重建后再次受伤的患者。在ER组中,在翻转按钮后且移植物固定于胫骨之前,对最初收紧的可调环进行重新张紧和打结。在LR组中,在可调环初始收紧和移植物固定于胫骨侧之后进行重新张紧和打结。比较两组在MRI扫描多平面重组图像上测量的隧道-移植物间隙以及临床结果。
手术时患者的平均年龄为30.3岁(范围14 - 61岁)。56例患者进行了早期重新张紧和打结,45例进行了晚期重新张紧和打结。两组的术前特征无显著差异。ER组的平均±标准差隧道-移植物间隙为1.5±2.0mm,LR组为5.4±4.0mm(P <.001)。两组的临床结果无显著差异。
早期重新张紧和打结显示的隧道-移植物间隙比晚期重新张紧小。然而,根据重新张紧的时机,临床结果并无差异。