• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量加速上皮下角膜交联方案提供与德累斯顿方案类似的角膜增强效果。

High-Fluence Accelerated Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking Protocol Provides Dresden Protocol-Like Corneal Strengthening.

机构信息

Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Apr 29;10(5):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.5.10.

DOI:10.1167/tvst.10.5.10
PMID:34542574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8458988/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess whether optimized technical settings for accelerated epithelium-off corneal cross-linking may lead to increases in biomechanical stiffness similar to the benchmark 30-minute epithelium-off Dresden protocol.

METHODS

Three-hundred porcine eyes were divided equally into six groups for analysis. All samples underwent epithelial debridement and soaking with 0.1% iso-osmolar riboflavin solution for 20 minutes. Corneal cross-linking (CXL) was performed using epithelium-off protocols varying in acceleration and total fluence (intensity in mW/cm² * time in minutes, total fluence in J/cm²): standard (S)-CXL (330, 5.4), accelerated (A)-CXL (910, 5.4), A-CXL (913'20″, 7.2), A-CXL (186'40″, 7.2), and A-CXL (18*9'15″, 10). Control corneas were not irradiated. The elastic modulus of 5-mm wide corneal strips was measured as an indicator of corneal stiffness.

RESULTS

All irradiated groups had significantly higher elastic modulus than controls (P < 0.05), with a stiffening effect of 133% S-CXL (330, 5.4), 122% A-CXL (910, 5.4), 120% A-CXL (913'20″, 7.2), 114% A-CXL (186'40″, 7.2) and 149% A-CXL (189'15″, 10). The high-fluence accelerated epithelium-off protocol (189'15″, 10) showed the highest stiffening effect. Elastic modulus at 5% strain (1%-5% strain) showed significant differences between A-CXL (189'15″, 7.2) and three other accelerated protocols: A-CXL (910, 5.4; P = 0.01), A-CXL (913'20″, 7.2; P = 0.003), and A-CXL (186'40″, 10; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

An accelerated high-fluence epithelium-off CXL protocol (18 mW/cm² for 9'15″) was identified to provide a significantly greater stiffening effect than any other accelerated protocols and is indistinguishable from the Dresden protocol, with accelerating irradiation times ranging from 30 to 9 minutes; by combining gentle acceleration with higher fluence, such a protocol does not require supplemental oxygen.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

This A-CXL (18*9'15″, 10) protocol has the potential to become a new standard in epithelium-off CXL, delivering Dresden protocol-like strengthening over a shorter period.

摘要

目的

评估加速去上皮角膜交联的优化技术参数是否会导致生物力学硬度的增加,类似于基准的 30 分钟去上皮德累斯顿方案。

方法

将 300 只猪眼平均分为 6 组进行分析。所有样本均行上皮清创术并用 0.1%等渗核黄素溶液浸泡 20 分钟。采用不同加速和总辐照量(强度 mW/cm²时间分钟,总辐照量 J/cm²)的去上皮方案进行角膜交联(CXL):标准(S)-CXL(330,5.4)、加速(A)-CXL(910,5.4)、A-CXL(913'20″,7.2)、A-CXL(186'40″,7.2)和 A-CXL(189'15″,10)。对照角膜不照射。测量 5mm 宽角膜条的弹性模量作为角膜硬度的指标。

结果

所有照射组的弹性模量均明显高于对照组(P<0.05),S-CXL(330,5.4)、A-CXL(910,5.4)、A-CXL(913'20″,7.2)、A-CXL(186'40″,7.2)和 A-CXL(189'15″,10)的硬化效果分别为 133%、122%、120%、114%和 149%。高剂量加速去上皮方案(189'15″,10)显示出最高的硬化效果。在 5%应变时的弹性模量(1%-5%应变)在 A-CXL(189'15″,7.2)和其他三种加速方案之间存在显著差异:A-CXL(910,5.4;P=0.01)、A-CXL(913'20″,7.2;P=0.003)和 A-CXL(186'40″,10;P=0.0001)。

结论

确定了一种加速高剂量去上皮 CXL 方案(18mW/cm² 照射 9'15″),与任何其他加速方案相比,该方案可显著增强硬度,与德累斯顿方案相当,加速照射时间从 30 分钟缩短至 9 分钟;通过温和加速与高剂量相结合,该方案不需要补充氧气。

临床意义

这种 A-CXL(18*9'15″,10)方案有可能成为去上皮 CXL 的新标准,在更短的时间内提供类似于德累斯顿方案的强化效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/4f8eed4bfc42/tvst-10-5-10-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/2ee037fa04d4/tvst-10-5-10-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/7697f68005e7/tvst-10-5-10-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/4f8eed4bfc42/tvst-10-5-10-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/2ee037fa04d4/tvst-10-5-10-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/7697f68005e7/tvst-10-5-10-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f903/8458988/4f8eed4bfc42/tvst-10-5-10-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
High-Fluence Accelerated Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking Protocol Provides Dresden Protocol-Like Corneal Strengthening.高剂量加速上皮下角膜交联方案提供与德累斯顿方案类似的角膜增强效果。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Apr 29;10(5):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.5.10.
2
Oxygen Diffusion May Limit the Biomechanical Effectiveness of Iontophoresis-Assisted Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking.氧扩散可能会限制离子电渗疗法辅助的经上皮角膜交联的生物力学有效性。
J Refract Surg. 2018 Nov 1;34(11):768-774. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180830-01.
3
Repeated application of riboflavin during corneal cross-linking does not improve the biomechanical stiffening effect ex vivo.重复应用核黄素在角膜交联过程中并不能改善离体生物力学加固效果。
Exp Eye Res. 2022 Nov;224:109267. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109267. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
4
Corneal biomechanical properties at different corneal cross-linking (CXL) irradiances.不同角膜交联(CXL)辐照强度下的角膜生物力学特性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 2;55(5):2881-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13748.
5
The effect of standard and high-fluence corneal cross-linking (CXL) on cornea and limbus.标准和高能量角膜交联术(CXL)对角膜和角膜缘的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 22;55(9):5783-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14695.
6
An investigation into corneal enzymatic resistance following epithelium-off and epithelium-on corneal cross-linking protocols.对上皮去除和上皮在位角膜交联方案后角膜酶抗性的一项研究。
Exp Eye Res. 2016 Dec;153:141-151. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Effect of accelerated high-fluence riboflavin and rose bengal-mediated corneal cross-linking on resistance to enzymatic digestion.加速高剂量核黄素和孟加拉玫瑰红介导的角膜交联对酶消化抗性的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03293-0.
8
Biomechanical stiffening: Slow low-irradiance corneal crosslinking versus the standard Dresden protocol.生物力学增强:低剂量辐照角膜交联术与标准德累斯顿方案的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jul;43(7):975-979. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.041.
9
The Resistance of Riboflavin/UV-A Corneal Cross-Linking to Enzymatic Digestion Is Oxygen-Independent.核黄素/紫外线 A 角膜交联对酶消化的抵抗力是与氧无关的。
Cornea. 2024 Jul 1;43(7):895-898. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003502. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
10
Analysis of Biomechanical Response After Corneal Crosslinking with Different Fluence Levels in Porcine Corneas.不同光密度水平角膜交联术后猪眼角膜生物力学反应分析。
Curr Eye Res. 2023 Aug;48(8):719-723. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2205612. Epub 2023 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficiency and Safety of Oxygen-Supplemented Accelerated Scleral Cross-Linking in Rabbits.兔眼补充氧气加速巩膜交联的有效性和安全性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jun 2;66(6):10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.6.10.
2
[Controllability and predictability of riboflavin-ultraviolet A collagen cross-linking: advances in experimental techniques and theoretical research].[核黄素-紫外线A胶原交联的可控性与可预测性:实验技术与理论研究进展]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 25;42(1):212-218. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202402017.
3
Effect of accelerated high-fluence riboflavin and rose bengal-mediated corneal cross-linking on resistance to enzymatic digestion.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal Cross-linking at the Slit Lamp.角膜交联术在裂隙灯下进行。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Feb 1;37(2):78-82. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201123-02.
2
Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking With Supplemental Oxygen in Keratoconus: 1-Year Clinical Results.《伴补氧的经上皮角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜:1 年临床疗效观察》。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;37(1):42-48. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201111-01.
3
Riboflavin Concentrations at the Endothelium During Corneal Cross-Linking in Humans.人眼角膜交联过程中内皮细胞中的核黄素浓度。
加速高剂量核黄素和孟加拉玫瑰红介导的角膜交联对酶消化抗性的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03293-0.
4
Optomechanical assessment of photorefractive corneal cross-linking via optical coherence elastography.通过光学相干弹性成像对光折射角膜交联进行光机械评估。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 13;11:1272097. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1272097. eCollection 2023.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 May 1;60(6):2140-2145. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-26686.
4
Comparative Functional Outcomes After Corneal Crosslinking Using Standard, Accelerated, and Accelerated With Higher Total Fluence Protocols.使用标准、加速和更高总能量加速方案进行角膜交联后的比较功能结果
Cornea. 2019 Apr;38(4):433-441. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001878.
5
Oxygen Diffusion May Limit the Biomechanical Effectiveness of Iontophoresis-Assisted Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking.氧扩散可能会限制离子电渗疗法辅助的经上皮角膜交联的生物力学有效性。
J Refract Surg. 2018 Nov 1;34(11):768-774. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180830-01.
6
Prevalence of keratoconus in paediatric patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得儿科患者圆锥角膜的患病率。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;102(10):1436-1441. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311391. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Differential Gene Transcription of Extracellular Matrix Components in Response to In Vivo Corneal Crosslinking (CXL) in Rabbit Corneas.兔角膜体内交联(CXL)后细胞外基质成分的差异基因转录
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 12;6(6):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.6.8. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Mechanical outcome of accelerated corneal crosslinking evaluated by Brillouin microscopy.应用布里渊显微镜评估加速角膜交联的机械学效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Nov;43(11):1458-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.037.
9
Biomechanical stiffening: Slow low-irradiance corneal crosslinking versus the standard Dresden protocol.生物力学增强:低剂量辐照角膜交联术与标准德累斯顿方案的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jul;43(7):975-979. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.041.
10
Age-specific Incidence and Prevalence of Keratoconus: A Nationwide Registration Study.圆锥角膜的年龄特异性发病率和患病率:一项全国性登记研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;175:169-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 28.