Suppr超能文献

蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)种群受益于草地/牧场,而同一景观中的熊蜂(Bombus impatiens)种群则受益于非玉米/大豆耕地。

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies benefit from grassland/ pasture while bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies in the same landscapes benefit from non-corn/soybean cropland.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257701. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Agriculturally important commercially managed pollinators including honey bees (Apis mellifera L., 1758) and bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson, 1863) rely on the surrounding landscape to fulfill their dietary needs. A previous study in Europe demonstrated that managed honey bee foragers and unmanaged native bumble bee foragers are associated with different land uses. However, it is unclear how response to land use compares between managed honey bees and a managed native bumble bee species in the United States, where honey bees are an imported species. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no such direct comparisons of bee responses to land use have been made at the colony level. To better understand how two different social bees respond to variation in land use, we monitored the weights of A. mellifera and B. impatiens colonies placed in 12 apiaries across a range of land use in Michigan, United States in 2017. Bombus impatiens colonies gained more weight and produced more drones when surrounded by diverse agricultural land (i.e., non-corn/soybean cropland such as tree fruits and grapes), while honey bee colonies gained more weight when surrounded by more grassland/pasture land. These findings add to our understanding of how different bee species respond to agricultural landscapes, highlighting the need for further species-specific land use studies to inform tailored land management.

摘要

农业上重要的商业管理传粉媒介,包括蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.,1758)和熊蜂(Bombus impatiens Cresson,1863),依赖周围的景观来满足其饮食需求。之前在欧洲的一项研究表明,管理的蜜蜂采集者和未管理的本地熊蜂采集者与不同的土地利用方式有关。然而,尚不清楚在美国,作为一种引进物种的蜜蜂,其对土地利用的反应与一种管理的本地熊蜂物种有何不同。此外,据我们所知,在美国,尚未在群体层面上对蜜蜂对土地利用的反应进行过这种直接比较。为了更好地了解两种不同的社会性蜜蜂如何对土地利用的变化做出反应,我们在 2017 年监测了在美国密歇根州 12 个养蜂场中放置的 A. mellifera 和 B. impatiens 群体的体重,这些养蜂场位于不同的土地利用类型中。当周围是多样化的农业用地(即非玉米/大豆耕地,如水果和葡萄)时,B. impatiens 群体的体重增加更多,并且产生了更多的雄蜂,而当周围是更多的草地/牧场时,蜜蜂群体的体重增加更多。这些发现增加了我们对不同蜜蜂物种如何对农业景观做出反应的理解,强调需要进一步进行特定物种的土地利用研究,以为有针对性的土地管理提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff7/8452077/7f9cdb2818b8/pone.0257701.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验