Suppr超能文献

全口数字化种植体印模的体外和体内精度。

In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Odontology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Biomedical Engineering Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1444-1454. doi: 10.1111/clr.13844. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the study was to compare the accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions for fixed dental prosthesis under in vitro and in vivo conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients (five women and three men) with at least one edentulous arch and with 4-6 osseointegrated implants participated in this study. For each edentulous arch (n = 10), experimental screw-retained titanium bar with attached four scan bodies was fabricated. The bar containing four scan bodies was screw-retained intraorally on implants and scanned with Trios 3 intraoral scanner eight times (IOS group, in vivo). Then, the bar was attached to the master cast and scanned eight times again with the same intraoral scanner (MIOS group, in vitro). Finally, the bar with scan bodies was scanned 8 times with a laboratory scanner (reference). Precision and trueness were calculated for 3 distances and 3 angles between the scan bodies (1-2, 1-3, and 1-4) in IOS and MIOS groups.

RESULTS

Precision and trueness for the largest distance (1-4) were found to be 44 ± 18 µm and 32 ± 19 µm for the IOS group and 31 ± 16 µm and 30 ± 14 µm for MIOS group, respectively. Precision and trueness for the angle between the most distant scan bodies (1-4) were 0.22 ± 0.14° and 0.18 ± 0.10° for the IOS group and 0.16 ± 0.11° and 0.07 ± 0.05° for MIOS group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoral conditions moderately affected the precision and trueness of Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner. Results of in vitro accuracy studies cannot be directly transferred to the clinical field.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较固定义齿全口数字化种植体印模在体外和体内条件下的准确性。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 8 名(5 名女性,3 名男性)至少有一个无牙颌且有 4-6 个骨整合种植体的患者。为每个无牙颌(n=10),制作了带有四个扫描体的实验性螺丝固位钛杆。将带有四个扫描体的杆通过螺丝固位在种植体上,使用 Trio 3 口内扫描仪扫描 8 次(IOS 组,体内)。然后,将杆连接到主模型上,再次使用相同的口内扫描仪扫描 8 次(MIOS 组,体外)。最后,将带有扫描体的杆用实验室扫描仪扫描 8 次(参考)。在 IOS 和 MIOS 组中,计算了三个距离和三个角度(1-2、1-3 和 1-4)之间的精度和准确度。

结果

IOS 组中最大距离(1-4)的精度和准确度分别为 44±18µm 和 32±19µm,MIOS 组分别为 31±16µm 和 30±14µm。最远距离(1-4)之间角度的精度和准确度分别为 IOS 组 0.22±0.14°和 0.18±0.10°,MIOS 组 0.16±0.11°和 0.07±0.05°。

结论

口内条件会中度影响 Trio 3(3Shape)口内扫描仪的精度和准确度。体外准确性研究的结果不能直接转化到临床领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验