El-Athman Fatima, Zehlike Lisa, Kämpfe Alexander, Junek Ralf, Selinka Hans-Christoph, Mahringer Daniel, Grunert Andreas
German Environment Agency (UBA), Section Water Treatment, Schichauweg 58, Berlin 12307, Germany.
German Environment Agency (UBA), Section Water Treatment, Schichauweg 58, Berlin 12307, Germany.
Water Res. 2021 Oct 1;204:117648. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117648. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
Pool water is continuously circulated and reused after an extensive treatment including disinfection by chlorination, ozonation or UV treatment. In Germany, these methods are regulated by DIN standard 19643. Recently, the DIN standard has been extended by a new disinfection method using hypobromous acid as disinfectant formed by introducing ozone into water with naturally or artificially high bromide content during water treatment. In this study, we tested the disinfection efficacy of the ozone-bromine treatment in comparison to hypochlorous acid in a flow-through test rig using the bacterial indicator strains Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus and the viral indicators phage MS2 and phage PRD1. Furthermore, the formation of disinfection by-products and their potential toxic effects were investigated in eight pool water samples using different disinfection methods including the ozone-bromine treatment. Our results show that the efficacy of hypobromous acid, depending on its concentration and the tested organism, is comparable to that of hypochlorous acid. Hypobromous acid was effective against five of six tested indicator organisms. However, using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and drinking water as test water, both tested disinfectants (0.6 mg L as Cl hypobromous acid as well as 0.3 mg L as Cl hypochlorous acid) did not achieve a reduction of four log levels within 30 s, as required by DIN 19643. The formation of brominated disinfection by-products depends primarily on the bromide concentration of the filling water, with the treatment method having a smaller effect. The eight pool water samples did not show critical values in vitro for acute cytotoxicity or genotoxicity in the applied assays. In real pool water samples, the acute toxicological potential was not higher than for conventional disinfection methods. However, for a final assessment of toxicity, all single substance toxicities of known DBPs present in pool water treated by the ozone-bromine treatment have to be analyzed additionally.
泳池水经过包括氯化消毒、臭氧消毒或紫外线处理在内的广泛处理后会持续循环再利用。在德国,这些方法受DIN标准19643的规范。最近,DIN标准通过一种新的消毒方法得到了扩展,该方法使用次溴酸作为消毒剂,在水处理过程中,通过将臭氧引入天然或人工富含溴化物的水中来形成次溴酸。在本研究中,我们在一个流通试验装置中,使用细菌指示菌株大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌以及病毒指示物噬菌体MS2和噬菌体PRD1,测试了臭氧-溴处理与次氯酸相比的消毒效果。此外,还使用包括臭氧-溴处理在内的不同消毒方法,对八个泳池水样中消毒副产物的形成及其潜在毒性作用进行了研究。我们的结果表明,次溴酸的效果,取决于其浓度和所测试的生物体,与次氯酸相当。次溴酸对六种测试指示生物中的五种有效。然而,以铜绿假单胞菌和饮用水作为测试水时,两种测试消毒剂(0.6 mg/L以氯计的次溴酸以及0.3 mg/L以氯计的次氯酸)在30秒内均未达到DIN 19643要求的降低四个对数级别的效果。溴化消毒副产物的形成主要取决于补充水中的溴化物浓度,处理方法的影响较小。在所应用的检测中,八个泳池水样在体外未显示出急性细胞毒性或遗传毒性的临界值。在实际的泳池水样中,急性毒理学潜力并不高于传统消毒方法。然而,为了进行毒性的最终评估,还必须额外分析臭氧-溴处理的泳池水中存在的已知消毒副产物的所有单一物质毒性。