• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否应该在感染性休克早期开始使用血管加压药?

Should Vasopressors Be Started Early in Septic Shock?

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):683-688. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733897. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1733897
PMID:34544185
Abstract

Sepsis can influence blood volume, its distribution, vascular tone, and cardiac function. Persistent hypotension or the need for vasopressors after volume resuscitation is part of the definition of septic shock. Since increased positive fluid balance has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in sepsis, timing of vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock seems crucial. However, conclusive evidence on timing and sequence of interventions with the goal to restore tissue perfusion is lacking. The aim of this narrative review is to depict the pathophysiology of hypotension in sepsis, evaluate how common interventions to treat hypotension interfere with physiology, and to give a resume of the results from clinical studies focusing on targets and timing of vasopressor in sepsis. The majority of studies comparing early versus late administration of vasopressors in septic shock are rather small, single-center, and retrospective. The range of "early" is between 1 and 12 hours. The available studies suggest a mean arterial pressure of 60 to 65 mm Hg as a threshold for increased risk of morbidity and mortality, whereas higher blood pressure targets do not seem to add further benefits. The data, albeit mostly from observational studies, speak for combining vasopressors with fluids rather "early" in the treatment of septic shock (within a 0-3-hour window). Nevertheless, the optimal resuscitation strategy should take into account the source of infection, the pathophysiology, the time and clinical course preceding the diagnosis of sepsis, and also comorbidities and sepsis-induced organ dysfunction.

摘要

败血症会影响血容量、分布、血管张力和心功能。容量复苏后持续性低血压或需要升压药是败血症性休克的定义的一部分。由于正性液体平衡增加与败血症的发病率和死亡率增加有关,因此在败血症休克的治疗中升压药的时机似乎至关重要。然而,缺乏关于以恢复组织灌注为目标的干预措施的时机和顺序的明确证据。本叙述性综述的目的是描述败血症性低血压的病理生理学,评估治疗低血压的常见干预措施如何干扰生理学,并总结关注败血症升压药目标和时机的临床研究结果。比较败血症性休克中早期与晚期使用升压药的大多数研究规模较小、单中心、回顾性。“早期”的范围在 1 到 12 小时之间。现有研究表明,平均动脉压为 60 至 65mmHg 作为发病率和死亡率增加风险的阈值,而较高的血压目标似乎不会带来额外的益处。尽管这些数据主要来自观察性研究,但支持在败血症休克治疗中(在 0-3 小时的窗口期内)将升压药与液体联合使用,即“早期”。然而,最佳复苏策略应考虑感染源、病理生理学、败血症诊断前的时间和临床过程,以及合并症和败血症引起的器官功能障碍。

相似文献

1
Should Vasopressors Be Started Early in Septic Shock?是否应该在感染性休克早期开始使用血管加压药?
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):683-688. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733897. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
The initial resuscitation of septic shock.感染性休克的初步复苏。
J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review.早期脓毒症相关性低灌注的管理实践演变:叙述性综述。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 May 15;207(10):1283-1299. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1831CI.
4
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
5
Delayed vasopressor initiation is associated with increased mortality in patients with septic shock.延迟血管升压药的使用与感染性休克患者死亡率的增加有关。
J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
6
Prognosis of patients excluded by the definition of septic shock based on their lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation: a prospective multi-center observational study.基于初始液体复苏后乳酸水平对脓毒性休克定义排除的患者的预后:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 24;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1935-3.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
8
From a pressure-guided to a perfusion-centered resuscitation strategy in septic shock: Critical literature review and illustrative case.从压力指导到灌注为中心的复苏策略在感染性休克中的应用:关键文献回顾和案例说明。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:294-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.008. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Liberal Versus Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Early Septic Shock: Rationale for a Randomized Trial.自由与限制静脉输液治疗早期感染性休克:随机试验的理由。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;72(4):457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 May 10.
10
Septic shock resuscitation in the first hour.脓毒性休克复苏:首个小时。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Dec;23(6):561-566. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000460.

引用本文的文献

1
2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department.2023年成人脓毒症和感染性休克最新进展:急诊科管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3188. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093188.
2
Luteolin improves vasoconstriction function and survival of septic mice via AMPK/NF-κB pathway.木犀草素通过AMPK/NF-κB途径改善脓毒症小鼠的血管收缩功能和生存率。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 31;9(2):e13330. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13330. eCollection 2023 Feb.