• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高医院住院患者按需用药医嘱记录的质量。

Improving documentation of prescriptions for as-required medications in hospital inpatients.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Sep;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001277.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001277
PMID:34544692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454436/
Abstract

It is estimated that 1 in 10 hospital inpatients in Scotland have experienced a medication error. In our unit, an audit in 2019 identified documentation of as-required prescriptions on drug Kardexes as an important target for improvement. This project aimed to reduce the percentage of these errors to <5% in the ward in 6 months.Weekly point prevalence surveys were used to measure medication error rates over a 12-week baseline period. Errors in route, frequency of dose and maximum dose accounted for >80% of all prescribing errors. The intervention was a poster reminder about the three most common errors linked to standards for prescribing pain medication. Barriers to change were identified through inductive thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with five ward doctors and two staff nurses.In the 6 weeks after intervention, our run chart showed a shift in maximum dose errors per patient, which fell from 75% to 26%. However, route and frequency errors remained high at >70% per patient. Most of these errors were due to use of abbreviations, and qualitative interviews revealed that senior doctors and nurses believed that these abbreviations were safe. We found some evidence from national guidelines to support these beliefs.Overall, the intervention was associated with decreased prevalence of patients without a maximum dose written on their prescription, but lack of space on drug prescriptions was identified as a key barrier to further improvement in both maximum dose and abbreviation errors.

摘要

据估计,苏格兰每 10 名住院患者中就有 1 名经历过用药错误。在我们的科室,2019 年的一次审计将 Kardex 上按需处方的记录确定为一个重要的改进目标。该项目旨在在 6 个月内将该病房的这些错误百分比降低到<5%。我们使用每周时点患病率调查来衡量 12 周基线期内的用药错误率。在所有用药错误中,给药途径、剂量频率和最大剂量错误超过 80%。干预措施是一张海报,提醒与疼痛药物开具标准相关的三种最常见错误。通过对 5 名病房医生和 2 名护士进行半结构化访谈的归纳主题分析,确定了变革的障碍。在干预后的 6 周内,我们的运行图表显示每位患者的最大剂量错误有所减少,从 75%降至 26%。然而,每位患者的给药途径和频率错误仍高达>70%。这些错误大多是由于使用缩写造成的,定性访谈显示,资深医生和护士认为这些缩写是安全的。我们从国家指南中找到了一些支持这些信念的证据。总的来说,干预措施与没有在处方上写明最大剂量的患者比例下降有关,但处方上缺乏空间被确定为进一步改善最大剂量和缩写错误的关键障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6b/8454436/3d7c144c6f0a/bmjoq-2020-001277f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6b/8454436/07ec71146858/bmjoq-2020-001277f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6b/8454436/3d7c144c6f0a/bmjoq-2020-001277f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6b/8454436/07ec71146858/bmjoq-2020-001277f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6b/8454436/3d7c144c6f0a/bmjoq-2020-001277f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving documentation of prescriptions for as-required medications in hospital inpatients.提高医院住院患者按需用药医嘱记录的质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Sep;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001277.
2
Perceived causes of prescribing errors by junior doctors in hospital inpatients: a study from the PROTECT programme.初级医生在医院住院患者中开错处方的原因:来自 PROTECT 项目的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):97-102. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001175. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Improving feedback on junior doctors' prescribing errors: mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement project.改善对初级医生处方错误的反馈:一项质量改进项目的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):240-247. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004717. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
4
The contribution of prescription chart design and familiarity to prescribing error: a prospective, randomised, cross-over study.处方图表设计和熟悉程度对处方错误的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):864-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001837. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
5
Prescription errors in the National Health Services, time to change practice.英国国家医疗服务体系中的处方错误,是时候改变做法了。
Scott Med J. 2016 Feb;61(1):1-6. doi: 10.1177/0036933015619585. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
6
Pilot of a National Inpatient Medication Chart in Australia: improving prescribing safety and enabling prescribing training.澳大利亚国家住院患者用药图表的试点工作:提高处方安全性并为处方培训提供支持。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;72(2):338-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03967.x.
7
Improving the quality of written prescriptions in a general hospital: the influence of 10 years of serial audits and targeted interventions.提高综合医院手写处方质量:连续十年的系列审核及针对性干预的影响
Intern Med J. 2008 Apr;38(4):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01518.x. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
8
Prevalence of error-prone abbreviations used in medication prescribing for hospitalised patients: multi-hospital evaluation.住院患者用药医嘱中易错缩写的流行情况:多医院评估。
Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):e19-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02697.x.
9
Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a three-centre study of their prevalence, types and causes.医院住院患者的处方错误:一项三中心研究的普遍性、类型和原因。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Nov;87(1033):739-45. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2011.117879. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
Who makes prescribing decisions in hospital inpatients? An observational study.在住院患者中,谁做出了处方决策?一项观察性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Sep;88(1043):507-10. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130602. Epub 2012 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the quality and reliability of clinical reviews of psychotropic PRN medicines in a large English mental health Trust.提高一家大型英国心理健康信托机构中精神科按需服用药物临床评估的质量和可靠性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 25;14(1):e003094. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003094.
2
Practical Considerations of PRN Medicines Management: An Integrative Systematic Review.按需服用药物管理的实际考量:一项综合系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 12;13:759998. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.759998. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Ensuring success and sustainability of a quality improvement project.确保质量改进项目的成功与可持续性。
BJA Educ. 2018 May;18(5):147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
Improving the quality of insulin prescribing for people with diabetes being discharged from hospital.提高糖尿病患者出院时胰岛素处方的质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 24;8(3):e000655. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000655. eCollection 2019.
3
Can we improve the prescribing and delivery of oxygen on a respiratory ward in accordance with new British Thoracic Society oxygen guidelines?
我们能否根据英国胸科学会新的氧气指南,改进呼吸科病房氧气的处方开具和供应情况?
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000371. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000371. eCollection 2018.
4
Standards of prescription writing in a long-term psychogeriatric unit: a series of clinical audits.长期老年精神科病房的处方书写规范:一系列临床审计
Ir J Psychol Med. 2015 Jun;32(2):197-204. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2014.58.
5
Patient Safety and Prescription and Administration: A Systematic Review.患者安全与处方及用药管理:一项系统综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Aug 29;6(3):95. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6030095.
6
Oxygen prescription: improving compliance using methods from journal.氧气处方:运用期刊中的方法提高依从性
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jun 4;7(2):e000288. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000288. eCollection 2018.
7
Application of the SEIPS Model to Analyze Medication Safety in a Crisis Residential Center.应用SEIPS模型分析危机寄宿中心的用药安全
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Feb;32(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
8
Balancing measures or a balanced accounting of improvement impact: a qualitative analysis of individual and focus group interviews with improvement experts in Scotland.平衡措施或改进影响的平衡核算:对苏格兰改进专家进行个人和焦点小组访谈的定性分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):547-556. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006554. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
9
What is the role of doctors in managing demand on the NHS?
BMJ. 2017 Mar 16;356:j1269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1269.
10
Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药剂师主导的药物重整计划在医院转衔期间对临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010003.