Suppr超能文献

单手击鼓的专业技能和时间相关表现差异。

Expertise- and Tempo-Related Performance Differences in Unimanual Drumming.

出版信息

Motor Control. 2021 Sep 20;25(4):644-679. doi: 10.1123/mc.2020-0029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-speed drumming requires precise control over the timing, velocity, and magnitude of striking movements.

AIM

To examine effects of tempo and expertise on unaccented repetitive drumming performance using 3D motion capture.

METHODS

Expert and amateur drummers performed unimanual, unaccented, repetitive drum strikes, using their dominant right hand, at five different tempi. Performance was examined with regard to timing variability, striking velocity variability, the ability to match the prescribed tempo, and additional variables.

RESULTS

Permutated multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) revealed significant main effects of tempo (p < .001) and expertise (p <.001) on timing variability and striking velocity variability; low timing variability and low striking velocity variability were associated with low/medium tempo as well as with increased expertise. Individually, improved precision appeared across an optimum tempo range. Precision was poorest at maximum tempo (400 hits per minute) for precision variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert drummers demonstrated greater precision and consistency than amateurs. Findings indicate an optimum tempo range that extends with increased expertise.

摘要

背景

高速击鼓需要对敲击动作的时间、速度和幅度进行精确控制。

目的

使用 3D 运动捕捉技术,检查节奏和专业技能对非重音重复击鼓表现的影响。

方法

专家和业余鼓手使用惯用右手,在五个不同的节奏下进行单手、非重音、重复的鼓击。根据时间变化、敲击速度变化、匹配规定节奏的能力以及其他变量来检查表现。

结果

置换多元方差分析(PERMANOVA)显示,节奏(p <.001)和专业技能(p <.001)对时间变化和敲击速度变化有显著的主要影响;低时间变化和低敲击速度变化与低/中节奏以及专业技能的提高有关。单独来看,在最佳节奏范围内精度有所提高。在最大节奏(400 次/分钟)时,精度变量的精度最差。

结论

专家鼓手比业余鼓手表现出更高的精度和一致性。研究结果表明,随着专业技能的提高,存在一个最佳的节奏范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验