Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):e21-e26. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001931.
Accurate length measurements of extremity bones are essential in treating limb deformities and length discrepancies in children.
This study aimed to determine errors in common techniques used to measure lower limb lengths in children.
Precision and instrument errors in length measurements were studied utilizing electro-optical system (EOS), orthoroentgenogram, and teleoroentgenogram The goal was to measure a 70-cm metallic rod phantom (average length of the lower extremity of a 10-year-old boy in the 50th percentile) in 3 phases. In Phase 1, the length measurements were performed in an EOS unit with internal calibrations, a magball/magstrip in various scan positions, and measurement with TraumaCAD software. In Phase 2, the measurements were repeated utilizing a single radiation "shot" teleoroentgenogram. In Phase 3, an orthoroentgenogram was utilized with a radiopaque ruler reference. The reliability and validity of measurements were calibrated by 4 physicians (a radiologist, senior orthopaedic attending, and 2 orthopaedic fellows).
EOS measurements utilizing internal references had excellent accuracy (for a 700-mm real length, magnification error (ME)] of 0.09%. Teleoroentgenogram with a magball reference and measurements performed with automatic calibration by TraumaCAD program results in ME of 1.83% with insignificant intraobserver/interobserver difference. Teleoroentgenogram with a magball or magstrip reference measured manually showed that the magball has higher intraobserver/interobserver variance than magstrip, with a 6.60 and 0.33-mm SD, respectively. The length by manual measurement utilizing the magstrip has ME of 2.21%. Orthoroentgenogram is accurate with ME of 0.26%, but does not allow anatomical analysis and is also radiation-costly.
EOS and orthoroentgenogram are very accurate for length measurements. Teleoroentgenogram is less accurate in measuring length; however, addition of an external reference (magball, magstrip) placed lateral to the target improves accuracy. Automatic calibration with computer-based analysis of the external reference improves the accuracy more than manual calibration. If manual calibration is utilized, the length measurement is less accurate with the magball than the magstrip.
Level II-comparative in vitro study.
准确测量肢体骨骼的长度对于治疗儿童肢体畸形和长度差异至关重要。
本研究旨在确定在儿童中测量下肢长度时常用技术的误差。
使用电子光学系统(EOS)、正交 X 光片和远程 X 光片研究长度测量的精度和仪器误差。目标是分 3 个阶段测量一个 70cm 长的金属棒(一个 10 岁男孩下肢的平均长度,处于第 50 个百分位)。在第 1 阶段,在具有内部校准的 EOS 单元中、在各种扫描位置使用磁球/磁条以及使用 TraumaCAD 软件进行长度测量。在第 2 阶段,重复使用单次放射“拍摄”远程 X 光片进行测量。在第 3 阶段,使用带有不透射线标尺参考的正交 X 光片进行测量。由 4 名医生(放射科医生、高级骨科主治医生和 2 名骨科住院医生)校准测量的可靠性和有效性。
使用内部参考的 EOS 测量具有出色的准确性(对于 700mm 的实际长度,放大误差(ME)为 0.09%)。带有磁球参考的远程 X 光片和使用 TraumaCAD 程序自动校准的测量结果导致 ME 为 1.83%,且观察者内/观察者间差异无统计学意义。手动测量带有磁球或磁条参考的远程 X 光片显示,磁球的观察者内/观察者间方差高于磁条,分别为 6.60 和 0.33mm 的 SD。使用磁条手动测量长度的 ME 为 2.21%。正交 X 光片的测量准确,ME 为 0.26%,但不允许进行解剖分析,而且辐射成本也很高。
EOS 和正交 X 光片非常适合测量长度。远程 X 光片在测量长度方面的准确性较低;然而,在目标的外侧添加外部参考(磁球、磁条)可以提高准确性。使用基于计算机的外部参考自动校准比手动校准更能提高准确性。如果使用手动校准,则磁球的长度测量准确性低于磁条。
II 级——体外比较研究。