Rasmusson Allan G, Hao Mengshu, Møller Ian Max
Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark.
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2363:51-62. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1653-6_5.
The integrity of isolated mitochondria can be estimated functionally using enzymatic activities or the permeability of mitochondrial membranes to molecules of different sizes. Thus, the permeability of the outer membrane to the protein cytochrome c, the permeability of the inner membrane to protons, and the permeability of the inner membrane to NAD, NADH and organic acids using soluble matrix dehydrogenases as markers have all been used. These assays all have limitations to how the data can be converted into a measure of integrity, are differently sensitive to artifacts and require widely variable amounts of material. Therefore, each method has a restricted utility for estimating integrity, depending on the type of mitochondria analysed. Here, we review the advantages and disadvantages of different integrity assays and present protocols for integrity assays that require relatively small amounts of mitochondria. They are based on the permeability of the outer membrane to cytochrome c, and the inner membrane to protons or NAD(H). The latter has the advantage of utilizing a membrane-bound activity (complex I) and the pore-forming peptide alamethicin to gain access to the matrix space. These methods together provide a toolbox for the determination of functionality and quality of isolated mitochondria.
可通过酶活性或线粒体膜对不同大小分子的通透性,从功能上评估分离线粒体的完整性。因此,已采用外膜对蛋白质细胞色素c的通透性、内膜对质子的通透性以及以内膜对NAD、NADH和有机酸的通透性(使用可溶性基质脱氢酶作为标志物)来进行评估。这些测定方法在如何将数据转化为完整性度量方面均存在局限性,对假象的敏感度不同,且所需材料量差异很大。因此,根据所分析线粒体的类型,每种方法在估计完整性方面的用途都有限。在此,我们综述了不同完整性测定方法的优缺点,并给出了所需线粒体相对较少的完整性测定方案。这些方案基于外膜对细胞色素c的通透性以及内膜对质子或NAD(H)的通透性。后者的优点是利用膜结合活性(复合体I)和成孔肽短杆菌肽来进入基质空间。这些方法共同为确定分离线粒体的功能和质量提供了一个工具箱。