Palpation of the femoral and popliteal pulses: a study of the accuracy as assessed by agreement between multiple observers.

Six vascular surgeons independently examined 44 legs in patients with suspected peripheral arterial disease. Each surgeon recorded whether the femoral and popliteal pulses were present or absent, and if thought to be present, whether they were normal or reduced in amplitude. Interobserver agreement was determined by calculating both observed agreement (Po) and agreement after correction for chance (kappa-k). The results were calculated both for each possible pair of surgeons and as an overall value for all possible pairs combined. Agreement as to whether pulses were present or absent was significantly better than expected by chance but was only moderately good (overall kappa for femoral pulse = 0.53, and overall kappa for popliteal pulse = 0.52). More often than not, agreement as to whether the pulses were normal or reduced was no better than expected by chance (overall kappa for femoral pulse = 0.15, and overall kappa for popliteal pulse = 0.01). For each assessment, agreement was no better for the more experienced than the less experienced pairs of surgeons. The results indicate that more objective methods than pulse palpation are required to determine whether there is significant disease in the aorto-iliac and femoro-popliteal arterial segments.