• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BK病毒肾病导致移植肾失功后的再次肾移植特征分析

Characterization of Kidney Retransplantation Following Graft Failure Due to BK Virus Nephropathy.

作者信息

Nguyen Kaitlin, Diamond Adam, Carlo Antonio Di, Karhadkar Sunil

机构信息

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Pharmacy, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Jan;269:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.07.047. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.07.047
PMID:34547587
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression following kidney transplantation increases risk of BK polyomavirus reactivation, a common cause of graft dysfunction and failure. Subsequent retransplantation is a viable option that has not been extensively studied. This study further characterizes BK Virus Nephropathy (BKVN) and retransplantation in the most expansive population to date, geographically, temporally, and in magnitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The OPTN/UNOS database was used to identify patients who received kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation between 1987 and 2018 that resulted in BKVN-attributed failure (n = 1587). This population was divided into those who underwent retransplantation (n = 495) and those who did not (n = 1092).

RESULTS

The retransplanted cohort was younger (45 vs. 53 yr; P<0.0001) and had fewer prior kidney transplants (P<0.003), lower expected post-transplant survival (P<0.001), lower rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (14.1% vs. 22.2%; P=0.0008), a greater proportion of white patients (55.4% vs. 43.2%; P=0.0002), a greater proportion of living donors (35.8% vs. 23.0%; P<0.0001), and longer allograft lifespan (2.95 vs. 2.41 yr; P<0.0001), compared to those not retransplanted. Among retransplants, DGF and high kidney donor profile index (KDPI) were associated with decreased allograft lifespan (P=0.001, P=0.0005, respectively). Steroid induction had no effect on allograft lifespan when compared to steroid-free regimens (P=0.915). Retransplanted allografts lasted longer than previous BKVN-failed grafts (10.44 and 3.70 years, respectively; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Retransplantation following BKVN-associated graft failure has been associated with favorable outcomes. To maximize allograft lifespan in retransplantation, clinicians may consider selection of low KDPI donors, prevention of delayed graft function, and tailored immunosuppressive regimens that minimize steroids.

摘要

引言

肾移植后的免疫抑制会增加BK多瘤病毒再激活的风险,这是移植肾功能障碍和衰竭的常见原因。随后的再次移植是一种可行的选择,但尚未得到广泛研究。本研究在迄今为止地域、时间和规模上最广泛的人群中,进一步对BK病毒肾病(BKVN)和再次移植进行了特征描述。

材料与方法

使用器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络(OPTN/UNOS)数据库,识别1987年至2018年间接受肾或肾胰联合移植且因BKVN导致移植失败的患者(n = 1587)。该人群分为接受再次移植的患者(n = 495)和未接受再次移植的患者(n = 1092)。

结果

与未接受再次移植的患者相比,再次移植队列的患者更年轻(45岁对53岁;P<0.0001),既往肾移植次数更少(P<0.003),移植后预期生存期更低(P<0.001),移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)发生率更低(14.1%对22.2%;P = 0.0008),白人患者比例更高(55.4%对43.2%;P = 0.0002),活体供者比例更高(35.8%对23.0%;P<0.0001),移植肾存活时间更长(2.95年对2.41年;P<0.0001)。在再次移植患者中,DGF和高肾供体风险指数(KDPI)与移植肾存活时间缩短相关(分别为P = 0.001,P = 0.0005)。与无类固醇方案相比,类固醇诱导对移植肾存活时间无影响(P = 0.915)。再次移植的移植肾存活时间比之前因BKVN失败的移植肾更长(分别为10.44年和3.70年;P<0.0001)。

结论

BKVN相关移植失败后的再次移植与良好的预后相关。为了在再次移植中最大化移植肾存活时间,临床医生可以考虑选择低KDPI供者、预防移植肾功能延迟恢复以及采用使类固醇用量最小化的个体化免疫抑制方案。

相似文献

1
Characterization of Kidney Retransplantation Following Graft Failure Due to BK Virus Nephropathy.BK病毒肾病导致移植肾失功后的再次肾移植特征分析
J Surg Res. 2022 Jan;269:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.07.047. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Results of repeat renal transplantation after graft loss from BK virus nephropathy.BK 病毒肾病导致移植物丢失后的重复肾移植结果。
Transplantation. 2011 Oct 15;92(7):781-6. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822d08c1.
3
Incidence and risk factors of kidney allograft loss due to BK nephropathy in the pediatric population: A retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database.儿童人群中BK肾病导致肾移植失败的发生率及危险因素:对美国器官共享联合网络/器官获取与移植网络(UNOS/OPTN)数据库的回顾性分析
Pediatr Transplant. 2021 Aug;25(5):e13927. doi: 10.1111/petr.13927. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Outcomes of repeat kidney transplantation following prior graft failure secondary to BK nephropathy: A single-center retrospective study.BK 肾病继发移植肾失功后再次肾移植的结局:单中心回顾性研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;23(4):e13672. doi: 10.1111/tid.13672. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
Factors and outcome in BK virus nephropathy in a Hispanic kidney transplant population.西班牙裔肾移植人群中BK病毒肾病的相关因素及结局
Transpl Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;12(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00458.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
6
Kidney retransplantation for BK virus nephropathy with active viremia without allograft nephrectomy.肾移植治疗 BK 病毒肾病伴活动性病毒血症而不进行移植物肾切除术。
J Nephrol. 2015 Dec;28(6):773-7. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0200-6. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
In kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus infection, early BK nephropathy, microvascular inflammation, and serum creatinine are risk factors for graft loss.在感染BK多瘤病毒的肾移植受者中,早期BK肾病、微血管炎症和血清肌酐是移植肾丢失的危险因素。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;18(3):361-71. doi: 10.1111/tid.12530. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in Kuwait: a preliminary report.科威特肾移植受者中的BK病毒肾病:初步报告。
Transplant Proc. 2005 Sep;37(7):3048-50. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.018.
9
Tacrolimus intrapatient variability in BK virus nephropathy and chronic calcineurin toxicity in kidney transplantation.他克莫司在肾移植中导致的 BK 病毒肾病和慢性钙调磷酸酶抑制剂毒性的患者内变异性。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2021 Mar-Apr;32(2):348-354. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.335446.
10
Association of treatment with 15-deoxyspergualin and BK virus nephropathy in kidney allograft recipients.肾移植受者中15-脱氧精胍菌素治疗与BK病毒肾病的关联。
Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):502-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00677.x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Analysis of causes of graft loss in 135 kidney transplant recipients].[135例肾移植受者移植肾失功原因分析]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Jan 20;43(1):133-138. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.01.19.