Suppr超能文献

舟状骨近端骨折愈合率的荟萃分析:术语很重要。

A meta-analysis of union rate after proximal scaphoid fractures: terminology matters.

作者信息

Chong Han Hong, Kulkarni Kunal, Shah Rohi, Hau Melinda Y T, Athanatos Lambros, Singh Harvinder Pal

机构信息

University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Pulvertaft Hand Centre, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2022 Oct;56(5):298-309. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1979016. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

Abstract

Heterogeneity in the anatomical definition of 'proximal' affects the comparison of outcomes of these scaphoid fractures. This study aims to review published outcomes of all variants to determine both, differences in terminology, and union rate based upon definition. A literature search was conducted to identify articles that reported descriptions and union rate of all acute (<8 weeks of injury) proximal scaphoid fractures in adult patients (>16 years old). Proximal fractures were grouped as reported ('third', 'pole', 'fifth' or 'undefined'). The data were pooled using a fixed-effects method, and a meta-analysis was conducted to compare relative risk (RR) of non-union against non-proximal fractures. Qualitative analysis of 12 articles included three main definitions: 'proximal' (1 article), 'proximal third' (3 articles), and 'proximal pole' (8 articles). Only 6 articles adopted a specific anatomical or ratio description. In a pooled meta-analysis of union rates (15 articles), 'proximal third' and 'proximal pole' fractures demonstrated a relative risk (RR) of non-union of 2.3 and 3.4 in comparison to non-proximal fractures, respectively. Operative management yielded lower non-union rates than non-operative for all fracture types (6% vs. 18%). In conclusion, non-union risk varies depending on definition, with non-standardised classifications adding heterogeneity to reported outcomes. We recommend an approach utilizing fixed anatomical landmarks on plain radiographs (referencing scaphoid length and scapho-capitate joint) to standardise reporting of proximal fracture union in future studies. : CI: confidence intervals; CT: computer tomography; Df: degrees of freedom; DL: dersimonian and laird estimator; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NICE: national institute for health and care excellence; OTA: orthopaedic trauma association; PA: posterior-anterior; PRISMA: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: relative risk; SNAC: scaphoid non-union advanced collapse; UK: United Kingdom.

摘要

“近端”解剖学定义的异质性影响了这些舟骨骨折治疗结果的比较。本研究旨在回顾所有不同类型骨折的已发表治疗结果,以确定术语差异以及基于定义的愈合率。进行文献检索,以识别报告成年患者(>16岁)所有急性(受伤<8周)近端舟骨骨折的描述和愈合率的文章。近端骨折按报告分组为(“第三”、“极”、“第五”或“未定义”)。使用固定效应方法汇总数据,并进行荟萃分析以比较不愈合与非近端骨折的相对风险(RR)。对12篇文章的定性分析包括三个主要定义:“近端”(1篇文章)、“近端三分之一”(3篇文章)和“近端极”(8篇文章)。只有6篇文章采用了特定的解剖学或比例描述。在愈合率的汇总荟萃分析(15篇文章)中,与非近端骨折相比,“近端三分之一”和“近端极”骨折的不愈合相对风险(RR)分别为2.3和3.4。对于所有骨折类型,手术治疗的不愈合率低于非手术治疗(6%对18%)。总之,不愈合风险因定义而异,非标准化分类增加了报告结果的异质性。我们建议在未来研究中采用一种利用普通X线片上固定解剖标志(参考舟骨长度和舟月关节)的方法来标准化近端骨折愈合的报告。:CI:置信区间;CT:计算机断层扫描;Df:自由度;DL:德西蒙尼亚和莱尔德估计量;MRI:磁共振成像;NICE:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所;OTA:骨科创伤协会;PA:前后位;PRISMA:系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目;RCT:随机对照试验;RR:相对风险;SNAC:舟骨不愈合晚期塌陷;UK:英国。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验