• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对正常儿童和临床儿童的卡罗听觉-视觉能力测试的析因研究。

A factorial study of the Carrow Auditory-Visual Abilities Test with normal and clinical children.

作者信息

Woodward P J, Svinicki J G, Carrow-Woolfolk E

机构信息

University of Texas, Austin.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1987 Aug;52(3):223-31. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5203.223.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.5203.223
PMID:3455445
Abstract

A factor analysis was conducted on the Carrow Auditory-Visual Abilities Test for the purpose of identifying common factors measured by the test. Two sets of scores were used, one from a normal population of 1,032 children and one from a clinical population of 141 children. Two basic factors accounted for a good portion of the total variance. The subtests that loaded on Factor 1 were Visual Discrimination Matching, Visual Discrimination Memory, Visual Motor Copying, Visual Motor Memory, Motor Speed Accuracy, Picture Memory, and Auditory Blending. The subtests that loaded on Factor 2 were Picture Sequence Selection; Digits Forward; Sentence Repetition; Word Repetition 1, 2, 3; and Total. Subtests that did not fall clearly into either factor were Digits Backward and the two Auditory Discrimination subtests. Except for the Auditory Discrimination subtests, there were no essential differences in the factor matrix between normal and clinical populations.

摘要

为了确定卡罗视听能力测试所测量的共同因素,进行了一项因素分析。使用了两组分数,一组来自1032名儿童的正常群体,另一组来自141名儿童的临床群体。两个基本因素占总方差的很大一部分。在因素1上有载荷的子测试包括视觉辨别匹配、视觉辨别记忆、视觉运动抄写、视觉运动记忆、运动速度准确性、图片记忆和听觉混合。在因素2上有载荷的子测试包括图片序列选择、顺背数字、句子复述、单词复述1、2、3以及总分。没有明显归入任一因素的子测试是倒背数字和两个听觉辨别子测试。除了听觉辨别子测试外,正常群体和临床群体之间的因素矩阵没有本质差异。

相似文献

1
A factorial study of the Carrow Auditory-Visual Abilities Test with normal and clinical children.一项针对正常儿童和临床儿童的卡罗听觉-视觉能力测试的析因研究。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1987 Aug;52(3):223-31. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5203.223.
2
A profile analysis approach to interpretation of the Carrow Auditory-Visual Abilities Test.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 May;54(2):214-25. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5402.214.
3
Sentence comprehension in adolescents with Down syndrome and typically developing children: role of sentence voice, visual context, and auditory-verbal short-term memory.唐氏综合征青少年与正常发育儿童的句子理解:句子语态、视觉语境及听觉-言语短期记忆的作用
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):172-88. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/013).
4
The relation of auditory, visual, and auditory-visual matching to reading performance of Israeli children.以色列儿童的听觉、视觉以及视听匹配与阅读能力的关系。
J Genet Psychol. 1977 Jun;130(2d Half):181-9. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1977.10533250.
5
The validity of the Constructional subtests of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests.感觉统合与实践测试中建构性子测试的效度。
Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Jun;45(6):539-43. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.6.539.
6
The Slingerland Screening Tests for identifying children with specific language disability: screening for learning disabilities in first grade.
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Dec;49(3):971-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.971.
7
The relationship between form and space perception, constructional abilities, and clumsiness in children.儿童的形态与空间感知、构建能力及笨拙之间的关系。
Am J Occup Ther. 1990 Jul;44(7):623-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.44.7.623.
8
Audiovisual sentence repetition as a clinical criterion for auditory development in Persian-language children with hearing loss.视听句子重复作为波斯语听力损失儿童听觉发育的临床标准。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;93:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
9
Cluster analyses of measures of sensory integration.
Am J Occup Ther. 1977 Jul;31(6):362-6.
10
Test-retest reliability of the test of visual perceptual skills with children with learning disabilities.
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Sep;47(9):819-24. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.9.819.

引用本文的文献

1
Separate digits tests: a brief history, a literature review, and a reexamination of the factor structure of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL).
Neuropsychol Rev. 1995 Sep;5(3):151-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02214760.