• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较贝伐珠单抗(HD204)生物类似药与欧盟和美国来源的贝伐珠单抗药代动力学的随机 I 期研究。

A randomized phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a bevacizumab (HD204) biosimilar to European Union- and United States of America-sourced bevacizumab.

机构信息

Paul Strauss Center, Strasbourg, France.

Institut Cancérologie de Strasbourg (ICANS), Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0248222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248222. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248222
PMID:34555031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8460034/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between HD204 and the European Union (EU)-sourced bevacizumab, between HD204 and the United States of America (US)-sourced bevacizumab, and between EU-sourced and US-sourced bevacizumab (NCT03390673).

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, 3-way parallel group, single-dose comparative PK study, healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of HD204, EU-sourced bevacizumab or US-sourced bevacizumab. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. PK equivalence was determined using the pre-defined equivalence margin of 0.8-1.25 in terms of AUC(0-∞) for the pairwise comparisons.

FINDINGS

Baseline demographics for the 119 randomized subjects were similar across the three groups. The 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of HD204 to US-sourced bevacizumab, HD204 to EU-sourced bevacizumab, and EU-sourced to US-sourced bevacizumab were all within the interval of 80% to 125% for AUC0-inf, thus demonstrating equivalency in the PK properties for all three treatment groups. Similarly, the ratio of the geometric means for AUC0-last and Cmax were all within the 80% and 125% margins, supporting the robustness of the primary findings. All other PK parameters, including the half-life (t1⁄2) clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and time of maximum concentration (tmax), were comparable. There was no difference between the 3 treatment arms in terms of vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events. None of the subjects treated with HD204 had positive ADA results.

IMPLICATIONS

HD204 demonstrates equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those of both US-sourced and EU-sourced bevacizumab. (NCT03390673).

摘要

目的

这项首次人体研究旨在评估 HD204 与欧盟(EU)来源贝伐珠单抗、HD204 与美国(US)来源贝伐珠单抗以及 EU 来源与 US 来源贝伐珠单抗之间的药代动力学(PK)等效性(NCT03390673)。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、三向平行组、单次剂量比较 PK 研究中,健康男性受试者被随机分配接受单次 1 mg/kg 静脉注射 HD204、EU 来源贝伐珠单抗或 US 来源贝伐珠单抗。使用非房室方法计算 PK 参数。使用预先定义的等效边界 0.8-1.25 来确定 AUC(0-∞)的成对比较的 PK 等效性。

结果

三组中,119 名随机受试者的基线人口统计学特征相似。HD204 与 US 来源贝伐珠单抗、HD204 与 EU 来源贝伐珠单抗以及 EU 来源与 US 来源贝伐珠单抗的几何均数比值的 90%置信区间均在 80%至 125%范围内,表明所有三组治疗的 PK 特性均等效。同样,AUC0-last 和 Cmax 的几何均数比值均在 80%和 125%范围内,支持主要发现的稳健性。所有其他 PK 参数,包括半衰期(t1⁄2)清除率(CL)、分布容积(Vd)和最大浓度时间(tmax),均相似。在生命体征、实验室检查和不良事件方面,三组治疗之间没有差异。接受 HD204 治疗的受试者均无 ADA 阳性结果。

结论

与 US 来源和 EU 来源的贝伐珠单抗相比,HD204 表现出相当的 PK 特征。(NCT03390673)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/f5ad2db7a38e/pone.0248222.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/ac7f3d59b008/pone.0248222.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/4d1b934edbce/pone.0248222.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/f5ad2db7a38e/pone.0248222.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/ac7f3d59b008/pone.0248222.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/4d1b934edbce/pone.0248222.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695f/8460034/f5ad2db7a38e/pone.0248222.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a bevacizumab (HD204) biosimilar to European Union- and United States of America-sourced bevacizumab.一项比较贝伐珠单抗(HD204)生物类似药与欧盟和美国来源的贝伐珠单抗药代动力学的随机 I 期研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0248222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248222. eCollection 2021.
2
A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of CT-P16, a Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar, with its Reference Product in Healthy Adult Males.一项比较 CT-P16(贝伐珠单抗生物类似药候选药物)与其参比制剂在健康成年男性中的药代动力学的随机、双盲临床试验。
BioDrugs. 2019 Apr;33(2):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00340-x.
3
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single‑dose, pharmacokinetic bioequivalence study of INTP24 and bevacizumab in healthy adult men.一项在健康成年男性中进行的 INTP24 与贝伐珠单抗的随机、双盲、平行分组、单次给药、药代动力学生物等效性研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;86(2):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04111-2. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
4
A randomized, double blind, single dose, comparative study of the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of MB02 (bevacizumab biosimilar) and reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers.一项在健康男性志愿者中进行的随机、双盲、单次剂量、比较 MB02(贝伐珠单抗生物类似药)和参比贝伐珠单抗的药代动力学、安全性和免疫原性的研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;88(3):1063-1073. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15032. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
A phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX04 to reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States, the European Union, and China in healthy Chinese male volunteers.一项比较 HLX04 与源自美国、欧盟和中国的参照贝伐珠单抗的药代动力学、安全性和免疫原性的 1 期随机研究在健康中国男性志愿者中进行。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;88(3):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04297-z. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
A Global Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Proposed Biosimilar BAT1706 and Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Healthy Male Subjects.一项比较拟生物类似药 BAT1706 和贝伐珠单抗(安维汀)在健康男性受试者中的安全性和药代动力学的全球 I 期临床研究。
BioDrugs. 2019 Jun;33(3):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00352-7.
7
A phase I, randomized, single-dose pharmacokinetic study comparing sb8 (bevacizumab biosimilar) with reference bevacizumab in healthy volunteers.一项在健康志愿者中比较sb8(贝伐单抗生物类似药)与参比贝伐单抗的I期随机单剂量药代动力学研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):567-575. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04144-7. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
8
A phase I pharmacokinetics study comparing PF-06439535 (a potential biosimilar) with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers.一项在健康男性志愿者中比较PF-06439535(一种潜在生物类似药)与贝伐单抗的I期药代动力学研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;77(4):839-46. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3001-2. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
A comparative pharmacokinetic study of DRL_BZ, a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, with Avastin (EU and US) in healthy male subjects.DRL_BZ 与贝伐珠单抗(阿瓦斯汀)的比较药代动力学研究,在健康男性受试者中的生物类似药候选药物。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2352-2364. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13691. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
A Randomized Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing Biosimilar Candidate SB3 and Trastuzumab in Healthy Male Subjects.一项在健康男性受试者中比较生物类似药候选药物SB3和曲妥珠单抗的随机I期药代动力学研究。
Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1665-1673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Populations Using PBPK Modeling and Simulation.使用生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型和模拟预测儿科人群中单克隆抗体的药代动力学
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Jul 5;17(7):884. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17070884.
2
Translation of Monoclonal Antibodies Pharmacokinetics from Animal to Human Using Physiologically Based Modeling in Open Systems Pharmacology (OSP) Suite: A Retrospective Analysis of Bevacizumab.在开放系统药理学(OSP)套件中使用基于生理的模型将单克隆抗体药代动力学从动物外推至人体:贝伐单抗的回顾性分析
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):2129. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082129.

本文引用的文献

1
A Global Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Proposed Biosimilar BAT1706 and Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Healthy Male Subjects.一项比较拟生物类似药 BAT1706 和贝伐珠单抗(安维汀)在健康男性受试者中的安全性和药代动力学的全球 I 期临床研究。
BioDrugs. 2019 Jun;33(3):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00352-7.
2
A phase I, randomized, double-blinded, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the biosimilar IBI305 and bevacizumab in healthy male subjects
.一项在健康男性受试者中评估生物类似药IBI305与贝伐单抗药代动力学等效性的I期随机双盲单剂量研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;57(3):167-174. doi: 10.5414/CP203349.
3
A comparative pharmacokinetic study of DRL_BZ, a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, with Avastin (EU and US) in healthy male subjects.
DRL_BZ 与贝伐珠单抗(阿瓦斯汀)的比较药代动力学研究,在健康男性受试者中的生物类似药候选药物。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2352-2364. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13691. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
A Randomized Phase I Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of HD201, a Trastuzumab Biosimilar, With European Union-sourced Herceptin.一项比较 HD201(曲妥珠单抗生物类似药)与欧盟来源的赫赛汀药代动力学的随机 I 期研究。
Clin Ther. 2018 Mar;40(3):396-405.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
A randomised trial comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of the biosimilar CT-P6 with reference trastuzumab.一项比较生物类似药 CT-P6 与参照用曲妥珠单抗的药代动力学和安全性的随机试验。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;81(3):505-514. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3510-7. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
A phase I, randomized, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab in healthy adult men.一项评估生物类似药ABP 215与贝伐单抗在健康成年男性中药代动力学等效性的I期随机单剂量研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;80(4):755-763. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3416-4. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
A randomized, single-blind, Phase I trial (INVICTAN-1) assessing the bioequivalence and safety of BI 695502, a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate, in healthy subjects.一项评估贝伐单抗生物类似药候选药物BI 695502在健康受试者中的生物等效性和安全性的随机、单盲I期试验(INVICTAN-1)。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017 Aug;26(8):889-896. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1347635. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.类风湿关节炎患者中,利妥昔单抗生物类似药CT-P10与原研利妥昔单抗多达两个疗程的疗效、安全性及药代动力学:一项I期随机对照试验第72周的结果
BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7.
9
A phase 1 study comparing the proposed biosimilar BS-503a with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers.一项在健康男性志愿者中比较拟用生物类似药BS - 503a与贝伐单抗的1期研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2017 Feb 20;5(2):e00286. doi: 10.1002/prp2.286. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
A Randomized Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing Biosimilar Candidate SB3 and Trastuzumab in Healthy Male Subjects.一项在健康男性受试者中比较生物类似药候选药物SB3和曲妥珠单抗的随机I期药代动力学研究。
Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1665-1673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 29.