Suppr超能文献

基于 CT 血管造影评估 C3-C6 椎弓根螺钉置钉安全间隙的可用性。

Determination of Availability of Safety Margin for Placement of C3-C6 Pedicle Screw on CT Angiography.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e22-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.057. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) in the subaxial cervical spine (C3-C6) are faced with high incidence of perforating the lateral pedicular cortex endangering the vertebral artery (VA). The present study analyzes the pedicle width (PW) from C3 to C6 and defines the relation of VA with regard to pedicle and transverse foramen (TF) to determine the safety margin in cases of lateral pedicular breach.

METHODS

Computed tomography angiograms of 500 patients were retrospectively studied to identify the pedicle width (PW), VA area, TF area, and the lateral pedicle to vertebral artery distance (LPVA). Occupancy ratio (OR; the percentage area of transverse foramen occupied by VA) and safety margin (SM; permissible displacement of VA in TF), along with LPVA were considered to be protective parameters against VA injury if lateral pedicle breach happens.

RESULTS

PW was 4.7 mm at C3, 4.83 mm at C4, 5.26 mm at C5 and 5.41 mm at C6. Mean LPVA at different levels was between 0.97 mm and 1.15 mm, OR was around 20% at all levels, and mean SM was between 2.34 mm and 2.92 at various levels. Sex differences were statistically significant for PW but not for LPVA, SM, or OR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study gives us an idea about the various parameters in placement of cervical pedicle screw in subaxial cervical spine and the probable reasons there are few vertebral artery injuries despite high incidence of cervical pedicle breach. LPVA, safety margin, and OR may explain why even very significant CPS misplacement does not lead to vascular injury or neurologic deficit.

摘要

背景

在下颈椎(C3-C6)中使用颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)时,螺钉很容易穿透侧方椎弓根皮质而危及椎动脉(VA)。本研究分析了 C3-C6 的椎弓根宽度(PW),并确定了 VA 与椎弓根和横突孔(TF)之间的关系,以确定在发生侧方椎弓根穿透时的安全边界。

方法

回顾性研究了 500 例患者的 CT 血管造影,以确定椎弓根宽度(PW)、VA 面积、TF 面积和侧方椎弓根至椎动脉距离(LPVA)。占有率(OR;VA 占横突孔面积的百分比)和安全边界(SM;VA 在 TF 中可允许的移位)以及 LPVA 被认为是防止 VA 损伤的保护参数,如果发生侧方椎弓根穿透。

结果

C3 处的 PW 为 4.7mm,C4 处为 4.83mm,C5 处为 5.26mm,C6 处为 5.41mm。不同水平的平均 LPVA 在 0.97mm 至 1.15mm 之间,OR 在所有水平均约为 20%,平均 SM 在不同水平之间为 2.34mm 至 2.92mm。PW 在性别间有统计学差异,但 LPVA、SM 或 OR 无统计学差异。

结论

本研究为在下颈椎中放置颈椎椎弓根螺钉提供了一些参数,并解释了为什么尽管 CPS 错位发生率很高,但 VA 损伤却很少发生。LPVA、安全边界和 OR 可以解释为什么即使非常显著的 CPS 错位也不会导致血管损伤或神经功能缺损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验