Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 1):150316. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150316. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
In the last decade, lignin has received much attention as a feedstock to produce bio-based products. This study investigates the potential benefits of using lignin to mitigate the environmental impact of the road construction sector. An environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of various top-layer bio-based asphalts using kraft lignin was conducted. From a cradle-to-grave perspective, lignin-based asphalts were compared with conventional asphalts. The results of the LCA revealed that the climate change impact of lignin-based asphalts could be 30-75% lower than conventional asphalts. For the other ten impact categories, trade-offs were observed. Overall, two key factors to make the environmental impact of lignin-based asphalts lower than conventional asphalts are 1) increasing the amount of bitumen-substituted and 2) using low-grade biomass fuels for process steam in the pulp mill. The substitution of weak filler with lignin was beneficial only for climate change and could lead to a worse overall environmental performance than conventional asphalts. Similarly, higher environmental impacts for lignin-based asphalts could be obtained if the pulp mill consumed natural gas to complete the energy balance to replace the part of the black liquor from which lignin is extracted. This study also includes an in-depth discussion on methodological choices such as the allocation methods for lignin, functional units, and asphalt layers considered. We believe that such a methodological discussion could be helpful to support future Product Category Rules for asphalt mixtures.
在过去的十年中,木质素作为生产生物基产品的原料受到了广泛关注。本研究探讨了利用木质素来减轻道路建设部门环境影响的潜在益处。本研究对使用木质素的各种顶层生物基沥青进行了环境生命周期评估(LCA)。从摇篮到坟墓的角度来看,木质素基沥青与传统沥青进行了比较。LCA 的结果表明,木质素基沥青的气候变化影响可能比传统沥青低 30-75%。对于其他十个影响类别,存在权衡。总体而言,使木质素基沥青的环境影响低于传统沥青的两个关键因素是 1)增加替代沥青的木质素量,以及 2)在纸浆厂中使用低级生物质燃料来产生工艺蒸汽。用木质素替代弱填料仅有利于气候变化,并且可能导致比传统沥青更差的整体环境性能。同样,如果纸浆厂消耗天然气来完成能源平衡以替代提取木质素的黑液的一部分,木质素基沥青的环境影响可能会更高。本研究还包括对木质素的分配方法、功能单位和考虑的沥青层等方法选择进行深入讨论。我们相信,这种方法讨论可能有助于支持未来的沥青混合料产品类别规则。