Suppr超能文献

影响非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中预防选用非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的因素。

Factors Influencing the Selection of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, 34996Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;26(6):656-664. doi: 10.1177/10742484211049919. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available.

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs.

CONCLUSION

Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.

摘要

背景

主要的房颤(AF)指南推荐非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)优于华法林,除非在基于比较每种 NOAC 与华法林的 4 项随机对照试验的罕见临床情况下。我们旨在调查与现有最新临床证据一致的当前 NOAC 处方行为。

方法

我们根据全国范围内的索赔数据,对 2018 年 7 月 1 日索引日期(ID)时年龄≥65 岁的非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)NOAC 使用患者进行了一项横断面分析。使用卡方检验分析正在服用的 NOAC 类型,并使用多项逻辑回归分析确定影响 NOAC 选择的因素。

结果

共纳入 6061 例患者。在 4 种 NOAC 中,利伐沙班是使用最广泛的 NOAC。与利伐沙班相比,年龄≥75 岁(优势比[OR] = 1.270,置信区间[CI] = 1.089-1.450)和女性(OR = 1.148,CI = 1.011-1.284)的患者更有可能使用阿哌沙班。有既往卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作/血栓栓塞史的患者使用达比加群(OR = 1.508,CI = 1.312-1.704)和阿哌沙班(OR = 1.186,CI = 1.026-1.346)的可能性更高。有肾脏疾病的患者使用阿哌沙班(OR = 1.466,95%CI = 1.238-1.693)的可能性更高。这些发现与比较个体 NOAC 的关键性试验和观察性研究报告的疗效和安全性概况一致。

结论

在 4 种 NOAC 中,利伐沙班是最常用的 NOAC。阿哌沙班更适合年龄≥75 岁的患者、女性和有肾脏疾病的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验