Department of Nosocomial Infection Prevention and Control, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Dec;118:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Different catheter lock solutions (CLSs) are used to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) for paediatric patients with central venous catheters (CVCs), but the most effective CLS is unknown.
To compare the effectiveness of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI in paediatric patients.
Potential studies were searched and selected through the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to May 2021. Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of CLSs for preventing CRBSI in paediatric patients were included. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Thirteen studies comprising 1335 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Taurolidine + heparin was effective in the prevention of CRBSI compared with heparin in paediatric patients (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.51). No significant difference was found between the other CLSs (such as vancomycin, ethanol, fusidic acid, amikacin, and amikacin and vancomycin) and heparin or between different intervention lock solutions for CRBSI prevention. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, taurolidine + heparin (85.3%) appeared to be the most effective solution for effectiveness on CRBSI prevention, followed by fusidic acid + heparin (77.0%) and amikacin + heparin (65.7%). There was no statistical global inconsistency among the included studies after design by treatment test (χ = 2.22, P=0.137).
The study showed that taurolidine lock solution seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI in paediatric patients. Well-designed randomized trials in paediatric patients are needed to provide more reliable evidence in the effectiveness of different CLSs.
不同的导管锁定溶液(CLS)用于减少儿科患者中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血流感染(CRBSI),但最有效的 CLS 尚不清楚。
比较不同 CLS 预防儿科患者 CRBSI 的效果。
通过PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 搜索并选择了截至 2021 年 5 月的潜在研究。纳入了评估 CLS 预防儿科患者 CRBSI 效果的随机对照试验。我们进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析,以估计风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
网络荟萃分析纳入了 13 项研究,共 1335 名患者。与肝素相比,牛磺胆酸钠+肝素在预防儿科患者 CRBSI 方面有效(RR:0.21,95%CI:0.09-0.51)。其他 CLS(如万古霉素、乙醇、夫西地酸、阿米卡星和阿米卡星+万古霉素)与肝素或不同的干预性锁定溶液之间在预防 CRBSI 方面没有差异。根据累积排序曲线下面积,牛磺胆酸钠+肝素(85.3%)似乎是预防 CRBSI 最有效的溶液,其次是夫西地酸+肝素(77.0%)和阿米卡星+肝素(65.7%)。纳入研究在治疗检验设计后无统计学上的全局不一致性(χ²=2.22,P=0.137)。
该研究表明,牛磺胆酸钠锁定溶液似乎是预防儿科患者 CRBSI 最有效的方法。需要在儿科患者中进行设计良好的随机试验,以提供不同 CLS 有效性的更可靠证据。